Also, if they did release ONLY Halo 4 just with 1080p 60fps at $50 on Xbox One, yes I would be against it. But Halo 4 is not the focus of MCC.
Also, if they did release ONLY Halo 4 just with 1080p 60fps at $50 on Xbox One, yes I would be against it. But Halo 4 is not the focus of MCC.
Vena said:
Its not "everybody". |
Are you REALLY going to pick on words ? Anyways, the vast majority of publishers do this in the industry. There, better ?
Sony is a company, and a company is supposed to make profit. You got a successful product ? Make as much money as you can off of it.
Is TLOU GOTY on PS3 forced on us ? Nope.
Who is it targeted to ? People who didn't play the game on PS3, and people who are going to buy a PS3 this Holiday season.
But what about the ones who already bought a version of the game ? Well, they already played it, so why would they buy it again ?
What's the problem, then ? Well, you tell me.
Just because you have an opinion doesn't mean you are necessarily right.
jlmurph2 said:
|
Your original comment don't have a single reference to the launch timeframes. You were talking about something different. When you understood that your original argument didn't have any merit, you started talking about them.
Dadrik said: Are you REALLY going to pick on words ? Anyways, the vast majority of publishers do this in the industry. There, better ? Sony is a company, and a company is supposed to make profit. You got a successful product ? Make as much money as you can. |
Corporate cheerleading.
Doesn't matter what the vast majority do... especially in this day and age when the vast majority treat consumers like magpies and throw shinnies at them designed to drain every last penny. See: EA, Ubisoft, Acti, etc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nv84a-dJG3M
Vena said:
Corporate cheerleading. Doesn't matter what the vast majority do... especially in this day and age when the vast majority treat consumers like magpies and throw shinnies at them designed to drain every last penny. See: EA, Ubisoft, Acti, etc. |
Oh, come on... Of couuuurse...
Seriously, they are only going to put a less expensive version of the game with more content on the shelves. What's the matter ?
Are you complaining when a 1-2 years old game is still on sale in stores ? No.
Well, why complain when a better value version of the same game is made available ?
I really don't understand it.
Also, I absolutely LOVE how you purposefully omitted the last half of my post.
Just because you have an opinion doesn't mean you are necessarily right.
Dadrik said:
|
Sony should just port it to the 360 and One and be done with it.
michael_stutzer said:
Sony should just port it to the 360 and One and be done with it. |
I'm not sure that would be a good idea.
"I won't give them my money, they won't milk me blahblahblah principles blahblahblah fanboys blahblahblah :("
Just because you have an opinion doesn't mean you are necessarily right.
Dadrik said:
Also, I absolutely LOVE how you purposefully omitted the last half of my post. |
I didn't, the youtube vid is the reply to it. Go watch it.
michael_stutzer said:
Your original comment don't have a single reference to the launch timeframes. You were talking about something different. When you understood that your original argument didn't have any merit, you started talking about them. |
Vena said:
|
So, then again, why complaining about this when nobody batted an eye for AC 4 Jackdaw Edition ? Why complain about this when nobody said anything about Halo 4 GOTY, Dishonored GOTY, Borderlands 1/2 GOTY, Batman Arkham Asylum/City, Civilization V, Forza 5 GOTY, Fallout 3 GOTY, Red Dead Redemption GOTY, etc... ?
I'm not exactly saying you're wrong, but a lot of people here seem to know when to protest.
Just because you have an opinion doesn't mean you are necessarily right.