By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - Blu Ray vs DVD Marketshare

 

What format to do you now use?

DVD 40 7.13%
 
Blu-Ray 171 30.48%
 
Digital 141 25.13%
 
Still love my HD-DVD :( 10 1.78%
 
Digital + Blu-Ray 70 12.48%
 
Digital + DVD 21 3.74%
 
Digital + Blu-Ray + DVD 58 10.34%
 
DVD + Blu-Ray 50 8.91%
 
Total:561

Great post Shadow. Might I also point out that the data shown coincided with the global recession. So what may be perceived as slow decline or minor gains should be taken into account with that fact in mind.



Around the Network

I either buy Blu-ray or pirate, depending on how much respect I have for the show/film.



Awww I miss Vetteman now.



Shadow1980 said:

Hope this helps:


 

Blu-ray is experiencing solid growth, but not as fast as that experienced by DVD. That can be blamed largely on HDTV not yet being universal. Only 77% of U.S. households have an HDTV. Meanwhile, color TVs were in over 95% of households by time DVD hit the market. In 1997, essentially every household in America that wanted a color TV had one, and once DVD players became affordable adoption rates exploded, going from about 10% in 2000 to around 70% by 2004. It was the most rapidly-adopted consumer tech to date.

Blu-ray has had to deal with having came out at a time when HDTVs were not in many homes. When Blu-ray was first made commercially available in 2006, less than 10% of U.S. homes had an HDTV. HDTV didn't reach 50% penetration until 2010, and at this rate it's still going to be at least a few more years before it reaches 90+%. It may take the remaining CRT TVs (which were discontinued by all major TV manufacturers some 7 years ago) to cease functioning to push the remaining holdouts into buying HDTVs. While total Blu-ray penetration is still at just under 60% overall, it is in 75% of HDTV-owning households (and climbing rapidly; in 2012 only 25% of homes and just over a third of HDTV homes had a Blu-ray player). Blu-ray penetration may grow even more rapidly thanks to the PS4 and XBO being on the market.

P.S.: I fell asleep last night before I clicked "Submit." I was sick and had a splitting headache to boot. Sorry if anything like the charts I posted earlier were already posted.


thank you so much for that post! Really was what I was looking for. I've updated the OP and put them in so thank you again. 

 

Really interesting as well to see that Blu ray is now the market leader and will only grow. Thank God sony killed off the HD-DVD early so that Blu Ray could reach it's full potential ASAP. And the PS3 having it in really moved it forward. Sony may be bad for shareholders but they're good for us lol. 

PS: Just as well there wasn't something else on your screen when you fell asleep! 



"Buy the Blu-ray + DVD combo pack"

I have a better idea. Why not let me buy the blu ray on its own and stop shoving DVDs down my throat. It's 2014.



Around the Network
BraLoD said:
Chris Hu said:
BraLoD said:
I don't know, but it's time to start trying new stuff!

When will you come HVD?

Still too expensive will probably show up eventually but it looks like the Holographic Versatile Card will never see the market. 


I really hope it does comes to us.

BD is already getting space problems to handle this gen games and I heard already that we are to see games coming in 2 or even 3 of them.

I know BD is still evolving and will handle this gen just ok, but we will need a new media in the next one probably, and I think the HVD may be the one.

It seems so cool and a really smart way to do the storage, and Blu-ray was also expensive years ago, maybe with some more good 5-6 years the HVD can be becoming a reality to us, I do really hope so.

I already read about the Archival Disk (I think it's named this way), that Sony and some other company were working at was already in use this year but I don't think I undertood it very well and I don't know if it's applicable to gaming, do you know about it?

Archival disks are really just that, for long term archiving stuff. It's not meant for consumers and probably comes with expensive readers.

HVD might be obsolete already when it comes out
http://www.extremetech.com/computing/159245-new-optical-laser-can-increase-dvd-storage-up-to-one-petabyte
1000 terra bytes on 1 dvd... Probably a theoretical limit, if only 1 to 10% of that can be realized it's still worth it.

NHK already has 8K 120fps image sensors and Japan is gearing up for 8K broadcasts, a new storage format will be needed some time.
12 bit 8K 120 fps video is 58.6 TB per hour uncompressed. There's also the challenge of reading and transmitting 133 Gbps of data.



SvennoJ said:

While true for 35mm movies and digital movies before 2013, 80mm movies and everything shot with Digital RED 5k cameras do have a significant benefit from 4K blu-ray. It's not only resolution though, 10 bit color and rec.2020 will finally replace the ageing 8 bit rec.709 limited color space, unchanged since DVD.  Plus support for higher frame rates. Ofcourse all that is lost on today's tvs, yet when 4K tvs start to become the norm in 5 years, rec.2020 gets implemented in tvs and Oled tvs become affordable you will see a big step up to 4k blu-ray.

Average tv size still keeps growing and a lot of movie fans will never stop until they get the full cinematic experience at home. 4K masters are quickly becoming the norm in Hollywood, so why settle for less at home :)

I love blu-ray but I see the limitations of the format, it's not all that sharp and compression artifact free on a projector. Plus 2.35:1 movies only have 1920x817 resolution on the disc. A well preserved anamorphically shot 35mm movie would still noticeably benefit from 4K.

Maybe a minority of buffs will buy into that.Like a small minority of audiophiles bought into SA-CD and DVD-A formats.Mass public will prefer the greater accessibility of smart tv available movies/streaming services.By the way the new disney star wars movies are all going back to being shot on film so it's not as black and white as you say.



Nettles said:
SvennoJ said:
 

While true for 35mm movies and digital movies before 2013, 80mm movies and everything shot with Digital RED 5k cameras do have a significant benefit from 4K blu-ray. It's not only resolution though, 10 bit color and rec.2020 will finally replace the ageing 8 bit rec.709 limited color space, unchanged since DVD.  Plus support for higher frame rates. Ofcourse all that is lost on today's tvs, yet when 4K tvs start to become the norm in 5 years, rec.2020 gets implemented in tvs and Oled tvs become affordable you will see a big step up to 4k blu-ray.

Average tv size still keeps growing and a lot of movie fans will never stop until they get the full cinematic experience at home. 4K masters are quickly becoming the norm in Hollywood, so why settle for less at home :)

I love blu-ray but I see the limitations of the format, it's not all that sharp and compression artifact free on a projector. Plus 2.35:1 movies only have 1920x817 resolution on the disc. A well preserved anamorphically shot 35mm movie would still noticeably benefit from 4K.

Maybe a minority of buffs will buy into that.Like a small minority of audiophiles bought into SA-CD and DVD-A formats.Mass public will prefer the greater accessibility of smart tv available movies/streaming services.By the way the new disney star wars movies are all going back to being shot on film so it's not as black and white as you say.

Sure, they will be shot on film since film still has advantages in picture quality over digital for shooting. They will be mastered in 4K however, 35mm film distribution prints have been discontinued. Especially for Imax sequences 80mm film is still vastly superior over a 5K digital camera. Those shots will be future proof for an 8K master down the road. (Eg Baraka and Samsara already have been scanned in 8K from their 80mm negatives)

I don't mind if Blu-ray 4K becomes the next Laserdisc. I was happy with LD, served me well for a long time. Blu-ray 4K has a lot more convenience than the huge LD discs though with max 50 minutes per side, many movies came on multiple discs. That kept the price high too. Blu-ray 4K should do better than LD. Unless the price is sky high due to blu-ray 4K, 3D 4K, blu-ray, 3D, DVD, digital copy combo packs :/



SvennoJ said:

Sure, they will be shot on film since film still has advantages in picture quality over digital for shooting. They will be mastered in 4K however, 35mm film distribution prints have been discontinued. Especially for Imax sequences 80mm film is still vastly superior over a 5K digital camera. Those shots will be future proof for an 8K master down the road. (Eg Baraka and Samsara already have been scanned in 8K from their 80mm negatives)


I don't mind if Blu-ray 4K becomes the next Laserdisc. I was happy with LD, served me well for a long time. Blu-ray 4K has a lot more convenience than the huge LD discs though with max 50 minutes per side, many movies came on multiple discs. That kept the price high too. Blu-ray 4K should do better than LD. Unless the price is sky high due to blu-ray 4K, 3D 4K, blu-ray, 3D, DVD, digital copy combo packs :/


the problem is the price will be sky high. I don't think the world will have the appetite for that for a long long time.