By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Real reason big budget 3rd party games are not on Nintendo systems

Sorry doing this from my phone. 

Last year Iwata flat out states why the Nintendo does not have the same support as Sony and MS. They do not want to pay for them.

 

In light of Ubisofts recent popularity in the media, I thought this would be interesting. With the parity issues and so called subpar versions being pushed left and right, i understand Iwata' s thinking. I do think they could do more with some mid tier western devs tho.

 

The interview is below. I have also included the link.

http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/en/library/events/131031qa/02.html

 

Iwata:

First of all, I used the word “commitment” to show our firm determination to do our best to reach our target. However, it was perhaps not an appropriate term to use as it has, as a result, led to some reports that speculated about my resignation.

I believe that my ultimate responsibility is to maximize the long-term corporate value of Nintendo. That is how I view my role, but on the other hand, I am not saying that the current financial forecast has become unattainable. As I remarked just a while ago, the annual financial performance of a video game company rests heavily upon its success in the year-end sales season. There would of course be a significant difference between the most optimistic and the most pessimistic scenarios. This is the inevitable fate of any video game company, and even if one may hope it to be more foreseeable, we operate in an environment where it is impossible to know the outcome of a product we have produced until consumers have tried it for themselves. What is more, how players influence the value of our products and turn them into hit titles through interacting with each other, and thereby creating buzz in society, is simply beyond our reach. All we can do is offer the best entertainment that we can and do our best to motivate our consumers to talk about our products, but there is inevitably a fair degree of uncertainty in our performance. Therefore, I do not think that it is the right time to change our financial forecast.

In terms of how we view our relationship with third-party publishers, I think it is natural that there is a difference between publishers who have the software development resources like Nintendo’s to build a software lineup of their own and publishers who do not. Since former President Yamauchi passed away, I have been considering what he taught us in the end, and his words that the worst thing we can do in entertainment is to follow what others are doing spoke directly to my heart. Following and imitating others is the kind of reasoning that Nintendo tries to avoid the most, and while we certainly do not have a negative attitude toward strengthening our ties with third-party publishers, employing the same methodology as the other manufacturers would only lead to the most simplistic competitive approaches, such as price wars or money-giving that would never end. We would like to take a unique approach of our own and build sustainable relationships with our third-party publishers.



Around the Network

If only Yamauchi was still alive and in control, he'd tell those welfare cheats to fuck off.

(then we'd probably have exactly the same situation, but omg how cool)



WHERE IS MY KORORINPA 3

Because it's a better deal to get them on 360 or PS3.

In fact, there was never a good reason to get Black Flag on Wii U over the last gen ones, it was even a worse idea, for example. This can be applied to many, many other multiplats.



My bet with The_Liquid_Laser: I think the Switch won't surpass the PS2 as the best selling system of all time. If it does, I'll play a game of a list that The_Liquid_Laser will provide, I will have to play it for 50 hours or complete it, whatever comes first. 

Because they dont sell



They should use their money to create new western studios now. If they can get games from those studios to sell, it may encourage more western third party support. Hopefully that's their next priority after they finished that new building.



Around the Network
bananaking21 said:
Because they dont sell

/thread



https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png%5B/IMG%5D">https://www.trueachievements.com/gamer/SliferCynDelta"><img src="https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png

bananaking21 said:
Because they dont sell

"tl;dr" would have got your point across, but would probably also get you banned.



WHERE IS MY KORORINPA 3

That entire last paragraph reads as nothing more than excuses and justifications.

If having third-party games on your system means that you aren't "following and imitating" then bravo, Iwata, you're doing wonderfully.



Sony and Microsoft don't have to pay a dime for the vast majority of 3rd party games either, save for the exclusive or timed-exclusive content.



st0pnsw0p said:
Sony and Microsoft don't have to pay a dime for the vast majority of 3rd party games either, save for the exclusive or timed-exclusive content.


That's every single big release so far in one way or another. Destiny? Advertising parternship (Sony pays $$$), W_D? Same thing. CoD? Advertising partnership (this time M$ pays the $$$). AssCreed? Same thing. The only games exempt from this are small budget release (which are next to nonexistant), Shadows of Mordor, and 1st party exclusives.

M$ and Sony are in a pissing contest over 3rd party titles, where the piss is streams of millions of dollars in advertising rights.