By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Why would Nintendo make another Console after so many failed attempts?

Fail topic



Around the Network
Slarvax said:

Because if they make this Handheld-Console hybrid, why should I choose the handheld? They're both getting the same games, and the console is just more fitting to me. So the handheld will just die. Or the opposite could happen (but that's less likely). Look at Vita-PS3/4.


The theoretical "Fusion" is not what you think it is. It is both a handheld and a console, not a console and a handheld that work together. Its like if Nintendo was able to build the entire Wii U into the gamepad, which would allow it to send signals to a tv or play games without a tv and away from an external power source. I don't really believe that it is technically possible right now (or at least for a decent price) but it is an interesting idea that I think Nintendo should look very closely into.

EDIT: Or maybe that is just my interpretation, because this is all just "Nintendo should do..."



The rumored "fusion" concept is two systems; a hand held, and a console.



Cause gaming is their main/only business?

And heck, no company is perfect... Every company has something that failed but you dont see them quit just cause of that... Valve has Steambox/Steam OS, Sony has the Vita/PCs/etc, MS has Windows Vista/ME, etc



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

They only had one failed console and thats the virtual boy, wii u is now making a profit!



Around the Network

Some of you people are hilarious.

N64 made them money. Gamecube made them money. Wii made them a SHIT-ton of money. Wii U, after a rocky start, is now finally making them money. And that is to speak nothing of the non-stop stellar sales of the Game Boy and DS portable lines.

The better question is, why WOULDN'T Nintendo make another console eventually?



So many failed attempts. This makes me laugh. The N64 is categorized as a failed console by so many people even though it was WAY ahead of it's time (with Analog Sticks, Rumble Packs, 4 Player modes and co-ops, and the birth of the Console FPS craze), but it didn't do as well as the PSX so they "Failed".

Truth be told, if it wasn't for Nintendo trying to be different from everyone else and gambled on different things, we'd be still playing with 2 player modes to this day.



RavenXtra said:
Just because you're not "winning" doesn't mean you failed. All home consoles prior to the Wii U (and possibly the Wii U in the future) have made them a profit as far as I know. No reason in getting rid of something that makes money.


Gamecube as well?



sundin13 said:
Slarvax said:

Because if they make this Handheld-Console hybrid, why should I choose the handheld? They're both getting the same games, and the console is just more fitting to me. So the handheld will just die. Or the opposite could happen (but that's less likely). Look at Vita-PS3/4.


The theoretical "Fusion" is not what you think it is. It is both a handheld and a console, not a console and a handheld that work together. Its like if Nintendo was able to build the entire Wii U into the gamepad, which would allow it to send signals to a tv or play games without a tv and away from an external power source. I don't really believe that it is technically possible right now (or at least for a decent price) but it is an interesting idea that I think Nintendo should look very closely into.

EDIT: Or maybe that is just my interpretation, because this is all just "Nintendo should do..."

that goes against many of the things Nintendo has said at recent investor meetings. they said that next-gen their devices will be more unified like "brothers" and that they will "absorb" the Wii U architecture and have different "form factors".

to me that doesnt imply a handheld that streams to televisions but rather seperate devices with the same architecture & operating system, similar specs and the ability to play all the same software.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

zero129 said:

So why do you think Nintendo would make another console? (If you do think they will, if you think they shouldnt you can also post why).

Wouldnt it be much better for them to make the rumored "Fusion" Handheld Console hybrid? would Nintendo not be more successful and make more money by doing this? also wouldnt it be better for Nintendo devs to focus all their dev time on one platform getting what they can out of it?.

also (Judging by other Nintendo handheld sales) if it sells well enough and outsells the other consoles Nintendo can still say they are winning since it will be a console also in a way..


The definition of a "console" changes every generation. Look back at all the innovations, new features, and portability introduced with each new generation. The "Fusion" concept is still a console (if it happens), it is just the next step.