mii-gamer said:
|
So it being free is why an 8th gen console cant maintain 60fps in a 5 year old 720p game, with no AA, DoF or texture filtering. Gotcha.
mii-gamer said:
|
So it being free is why an 8th gen console cant maintain 60fps in a 5 year old 720p game, with no AA, DoF or texture filtering. Gotcha.
SubiyaCryolite said:
So it being free is why an 8th gen console cant maintain 60fps in a 5 year old 720p game, with no AA, DoF or texture filtering. Gotcha. |
Because this isn't 2004 and generations are no longer defined by graphics benchmarks.
SubiyaCryolite said:
So it being free is why an 8th gen console cant maintain 60fps in a 5 year old 720p game, with no AA, DoF or texture filtering. Gotcha. |
Yeah, its called business and being smart with your money and expenditure. Again, logic and reasoning doesn't come into play when you downplay nintendo
Bayo = Best on Wii U
Bayo 2 = Exclusive to Wii U
Me = Mother F'n STOKED!!!
Thank you Platinum Games.
mii-gamer said:
Yeah, its called business and being smart with your money and expenditure. Again, logic and reasoning doesn't come into play when you downplay nintendo |
Yeah, its called weak hardware. It only took 4A 6 months (4 on the XBox One) to get get Metro 2033 AND Last Light Redux to be a solid 60fps at 1080p and 900p with significant graphical improvements. Platinum had one SKU, one 5 year old game and zero graphical imrovements. How much "effort" needs to be poured into the Wii U for it to get respectable results? Again, logic and reasoning doesn't come into play when you bury your head in the sand and defend nintendo.
Moderated,
-Mr Khan
This has turned into such a troll thread it's deliciously hilarious.
Nintendo Network ID: Cheebee 3DS Code: 2320 - 6113 - 9046
SubiyaCryolite said: Yeah, its called weak hardware. It only took 4A 6 months (4 on the XBox One) to get get Metro 2033 AND Last Light Redux to be a solid 60fps at 1080p and 900p with significant graphical improvements. Platinum had one SKU, one 5 year old game and zero graphical imrovements. How much "effort" needs to be poured into the Wii U for it to get respectable results? Again, logic and reasoning doesn't come into play when you bury your head in the sand and defend nintendo. |
My god, you just don't get it! Who the hell would spend additional money to improve the graphics of a game that is essentially being given out free? Given how better Bayonetta 2 looks over its original says that the Wii U can push a little harder. Therefore, it is logical to assume given more resources and more directed effort the original could be improved upon. However, it would make no business sense to direct that money into something that is essentially being distributed free. If you can't understand this, then you are clearly blinded by bias, which comes at no surprise judging from your posting history.
Cheebee said: This has turned into such a troll thread it's deliciously hilarious. |
Lol, gotta love Subiya.
Bayonetta is a straight port, included for free. Tomb Raider DE is a game being sold at full retail. I should hope more effort was put into "improving" TR.
mii-gamer said: My god, you just don't get it! Who the hell would spend additional money to improve the graphics of a game that is essentially being given out free? Given how better Bayonetta 2 looks over its original says that the Wii U can push a little harder. Therefore, it is logical to assume given more resources and more directed effort the original could be improved upon. However, it would make no business sense to direct that money into something that is essentially being distributed free. If you can't understand this, then you are clearly blinded by bias, which comes at no surprise judging from your posting history. |
"Despite Wii U version not having any noticaible graphical advancements (bar shadows) it still drops frames on a 5 year old game in 720p! Hence my original post "is this suppossed to be impressive?"."
My original point was dropping framerates DESPITE no enhancements is dissapointing. Is that wrong? Is that biased? Get over yourself.