By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Does MS really deserve praise for "listening" to consumers ??

Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
Puppyroach said:

How could they not know it wouldn't be a problem? They knew the cost of developing Bluray (which they are a cofounder of) so ofcourse they knew the system would be insanely expensive, they just hoped PS2 fans would swallow it anyway. Otherwise they would've gone a cheaper route if their focus was consumers.

So Apple knew that the first iphone would be a problem despite it costing more then normal cellphones at the time?

These companies take risks all the time, its impossible to know whether or not it would pay off. Furthemore, a lot of the reason PS2 sold well at all was because of its extra utlility as a DVD player. PS1 was an MP3 player. Why would PS3 not follow the trend because it was expensive. They didn't know price would be that much of an issue until after the PS3 launch. Its not like the PS2 was the cheapest console at the time, that was Gamecube. And just as easily as you try to peg an expensive blu-ray player as anticonsumer. I can easily mention how you forgot to include the 200$ loss they took on by giving the PS3 extra utility like its predecessors. Hell, MS was trying to push a format as well. Its not called format wars for nothing.

Ofcourse they knew that they were taking a risk, otherwise they would be completely incompetent. Just as MS knew they were taking a risk with bundling of the Kinect.

I remember how everyone bashed MS for the original Kinect, saying it would never be succesful. But their risk payed off in that case. These companies make calculated risks and hope that enough fans will jump onboard for the risk to pay off. In the case of both PS3 and X1, that risk didn´t pay off, so they reverse on their strategies to adapt.



Around the Network
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

Reading comprehension. Key word is first. And if you were paying attention, nobody was trying to spin that the PS3 was good. Puppy claimed that Sony could have known that blu-ray would cost the PS3 sales, before hand, I said that was impossible.

Its almost as if you didn't read my comment at all and are just flaming me because I was talking about the PS3.

Also, case in point.


You are right, companies don´t know beforehand if they will succed of fail with a new product.

However Microsoft changed the XOne before it was launch. For you logic one might assume that we don´t know if they would succed if they´ve hold to their guns.

I would have love to see them trying the original policies.

When thecnology is at hand, some time choice is not the best option.



Puppyroach said:

Ofcourse they knew that they were taking a risk, otherwise they would be completely incompetent. Just as MS knew they were taking a risk with bundling of the Kinect.

I remember how everyone bashed MS for the original Kinect, saying it would never be succesful. But their risk payed off in that case. These companies make calculated risks and hope that enough fans will jump onboard for the risk to pay off. In the case of both PS3 and X1, that risk didn´t pay off, so they reverse on their strategies to adapt.


Kinect had little to do with all the last year XOne hate.

The only complain was the price that Kinect add to the bundle, but everything else was the suposed TV,TV,TV and removing the "right" to resell, land and borrow fisical games without online checking.



Puppyroach said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
Puppyroach said:

How could they not know it wouldn't be a problem? They knew the cost of developing Bluray (which they are a cofounder of) so ofcourse they knew the system would be insanely expensive, they just hoped PS2 fans would swallow it anyway. Otherwise they would've gone a cheaper route if their focus was consumers.

So Apple knew that the first iphone would be a problem despite it costing more then normal cellphones at the time?

These companies take risks all the time, its impossible to know whether or not it would pay off. Furthemore, a lot of the reason PS2 sold well at all was because of its extra utlility as a DVD player. PS1 was an MP3 player. Why would PS3 not follow the trend because it was expensive. They didn't know price would be that much of an issue until after the PS3 launch. Its not like the PS2 was the cheapest console at the time, that was Gamecube. And just as easily as you try to peg an expensive blu-ray player as anticonsumer. I can easily mention how you forgot to include the 200$ loss they took on by giving the PS3 extra utility like its predecessors. Hell, MS was trying to push a format as well. Its not called format wars for nothing.

Ofcourse they knew that they were taking a risk, otherwise they would be completely incompetent. Just as MS knew they were taking a risk with bundling of the Kinect.

I remember how everyone bashed MS for the original Kinect, saying it would never be succesful. But their risk payed off in that case. These companies make calculated risks and hope that enough fans will jump onboard for the risk to pay off. In the case of both PS3 and X1, that risk didn´t pay off, so they reverse on their strategies to adapt.

Exactly.

I've never said, MS doesn't deserve praise because they never took a risk. I said praising them for listening to consumers is false because they didn't listen, if they did they would've at the very least acknowledge the public with a letter. If someone wants to praise them because of the changes they've made thats fine, but we can't pretend that they listened to consumers.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

Did MS really have any choice ?



Around the Network
Dark_Feanor said:
Puppyroach said:

Ofcourse they knew that they were taking a risk, otherwise they would be completely incompetent. Just as MS knew they were taking a risk with bundling of the Kinect.

I remember how everyone bashed MS for the original Kinect, saying it would never be succesful. But their risk payed off in that case. These companies make calculated risks and hope that enough fans will jump onboard for the risk to pay off. In the case of both PS3 and X1, that risk didn´t pay off, so they reverse on their strategies to adapt.


Kinect had little to do with all the last year XOne hate.

The only complain was the price that Kinect add to the bundle, but everything else was the suposed TV,TV,TV and removing the "right" to resell, land and borrow fisical games without online checking.

I know, but Kinect was a major factor in the pricing. I also remember when sony announced the PS3, they couldn´t stop talking about how it would become the mediacenter of our homes, very much like how MS was talking last year.



Dark_Feanor said:

IMHO the problem was that people complained and MS reversed that policy BEFORE the product was out.

It was pure and simple prejudice, and pointless comporation hate. But oh, they want things to be the some thing to be as it has been for 30 years, since with Atari 2600 and similars.

Of corse MS failed to put out the message and convince hardcore early adopters.

The fact, is that I look at my 4 and half years old iPod Touch and it looks and feel more "advanced" than the XOne looks today.

That last statement is stupid, you can't play CDs on your iPod Touch, you know people still buy CDs right? :P

People don't have a thing against digital downloads/games. Never have, if they did MS, Nintendo and Sony wouldn't have stores via their systems. If MS just pitched 2 consoles, 1 with a drive and one without that is download only just cheaper, people would have been on board. It was the forcing people to log on once a day to prove to them that you didn't steal the game.

Their pitch for the new gen was "Your are all thieves and we don't trust you so..."



Hmm, pie.

Dark_Feanor said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

Reading comprehension. Key word is first. And if you were paying attention, nobody was trying to spin that the PS3 was good. Puppy claimed that Sony could have known that blu-ray would cost the PS3 sales, before hand, I said that was impossible.

Its almost as if you didn't read my comment at all and are just flaming me because I was talking about the PS3.

Also, case in point.


You are right, companies don´t know beforehand if they will succed of fail with a new product.

However Microsoft changed the XOne before it was launch. For you logic one might assume that we don´t know if they would succed if they´ve hold to their guns.

I would have love to see them trying the original policies.

When thecnology is at hand, some time choice is not the best option.

This thread is not concerned with personal opinions about whether or not the XB1 would be good in its original state. Nor is it concerned with whether or not the XB1 would have payed even worse had it not changed faster.

This question of the OP is whether MS listened to consumers.

They did not.

So praise based off of that pretense is false.

MS changed to stay competitve and that could be seen as to benefit its customers and itself, which might be praiseworthy in some eyes, but not for the reason of "listening".



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

Customers speak with their wallets. Microsoft listened (actually before launch. They knew which way things were leaning and tried to fix it). But I haven't been on this site as much as I used to. I bought a PS4 and an Xbox One and both are pretty disappointing to me, thus far. I preferred the 360 to PS3 and preferred the PS2 to the original Xbox. I personally don't praise them (Nor do I praise my beloved Nintendo for doing what they should have been doing from the start). Since the OP is saying that EVERYBODY is jumping on the trend of praising M$, can somebody point out some examples of who these people are? I honestly don't see everybody praising them.



d21lewis said:
Customers speak with their wallets. Microsoft listened (actually before launch. They knew which way things were leaning and tried to fix it). But I haven't been on this site as much as I used to. I bought a PS4 and an Xbox One and both are pretty disappointing to me, thus far. I preferred the 360 to PS3 and preferred the PS2 to the original Xbox. I personally don't praise them (Nor do I praise my beloved Nintendo for doing what they should have been doing from the start). Since the OP is saying that EVERYBODY is jumping on the trend of praising M$, can somebody point out some examples of who these people are? I honestly don't see everybody praising them.

Its easy enough to say that, but where is the acknowledgement? They didn't have time to say we are working on it, or "Please Understand", but Don Mattrick had the time to say, if you don't have internet buy a 360?

Granted OP is at fault for making a sweeping generalization, but we can't equate Customers to wallets, not anymore, not in the generation of the Internet. There was a concern even before preorders, MS made no response, instead trying to clarify the policies, that people fundamentally disagreed with, when they saw the preorders after E3, Sony heard the complaints against Microsoft and listened, responding with a low budget youtube video that capitalized on the PR greatly, in some circles people even joke that Don Mattrick was the best advertiser for the PS4. They did this to themselves, and while it might be admirable that they've changed, there is no evidence to support the assertion that they listened.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank