Maybe that's why they subtracted 13 points off the game.

Its funny you mention that, cuz i agree in a sense. Seems biased, but its better taking the entire meta and comparing it. Lets say its a 70 meta, then lord have mercy. This clearly shows biased. Polygon is a good example of bias.

Also ironically, Nintendo Report gave one of the lowest scores to Mario Kart 8 (75) which is from an 88 meta. Maybe its not all true.

The world will burn if a musou game has a higher meta score than Destiny.

And I want to see it happen.

At least it's not Destiny bad.

Only 87? The sheer amount of boobage found in this game should grant it a 96! What a terrible review! /s

ONM is actually a rather respected magazine. They gave pretty accurate scores in the past.

We deserve a true, next-gen canonical Zelda game.

But Hyrule Warriors remains a pretty fun game all the same.

If you look on Meta there already is a review for HW on there, it's from some publication from Finland and it's a 87 as well. I'm not saying this game can't have an 87 average score or something in that region (I doubt it though), but I'm personally never gonna regard these sites that have platform names in their titles, just like I'm never gonna regard something like Quarter to Three.

I respect your opinion. I even kno there is truth to your words. Me, i dont like certain reviewers on IGN as they are bias for some titles. Different opinions, all we can do is respect each others. 

Polygon might not have microsoft in the name but i think they are amoung the worse. Even articles like Mario Kart 8 selling 1mil (forgot exact number) then when proven wrong they spin there words. TLoU is another example of biased. I think a 7.0 or a 7.5. Why? Sony biggest game.

Oh shit... Hyrule Warriors is sooooo doooooomed!