Do big gaming sites just wait for the average score that is out and throw it out cause thats what it looks like, they use three points presentation 7 gameplay 8 balue 7 now the average would be 7.3 or 7.4 if you round up anyway, But still do they just wait for the average on meacritic and go we dont want to annoy anybody, i have lost all faith in game reviewers again especially you nick,

Gamrreview final scores have never been made up of an average of the major criteria though

Didn't know anyone actually looked at those reviews on gamrreviews, no offense to the guy that wrote this one in case he sees this.

Do you have any problems with the actual review or are you just complaining about the score?

i know that, he just annoyed me cause he mentions hype and how he sees the potential, he is not supposed to do that, he is supposed to do his job that he gets paid for and that is review the game not the hype,

yup hecame down on it very harsh although he did say it may seem like im coming down harsh on the game, but he also mentioned potential and hype, he is supposed to be unbiased

Thats not much of an issue...heres an old Jimquisition for your viewing pleasure (its coming from a slightly different perspective, but there is some good stuff in there): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-oeOqgRi7E

And here is what an "unbias" review would look like: http://www.destructoid.com/100-objective-review-final-fantasy-xiii-179178.phtml

awful lot of effot but ill check it out

I can't understand the bashing Destiny gets for its "value". Seems to me that there's plenty to do, much more than in your average game. I think reviewers might've been expecting an endless game?

lol watched the video, he basically made the point i was making at the start