By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Destiny Dev: It Was "Liberating" to Move on From Halo

walsufnir said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
FiliusDei said:
Destiny does not come close to halo. I feel sorry for bungie but they deserve the low scores.


Perhaps they deserve the score they have currently, but it has been said many times before that Destiny has been concepted to be a ten year game.


And this might change if it isn't successful. By now it looks like a “several weeks“-game.


I haven't played it yet, but the devs said the game changes after you hit level twenty so I am guessing there will be more including DLC.



Around the Network
Aerys said:
Feeling a bit sad for 343i, forced to make Halo ans only halo like bungie was

Lol they were never forced, the studio was created with the purpose of taking over Halo from Bungie just look at the name of the devs.



I liked it better when they focused on games that could "stand on their own".
I'm not too keen on buying a 60$ only for me to get a mediocre experience unless I pay a lot more for expansions and DLC -__-



walsufnir said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Of course its liberating. MS would've made them make nothing but Halo for their rest of their natural lives. MS doesn't believe in creativity if there arent dollar signs attached to it.


What would you expect? It's the most successful horse in the stable. It's as if Sony would tell Polyphony to not let them make another Gran Turismo.


yeah because sony totally stood in the face of their best studio's making New IP's



walsufnir said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
FiliusDei said:
Destiny does not come close to halo. I feel sorry for bungie but they deserve the low scores.


Perhaps they deserve the score they have currently, but it has been said many times before that Destiny has been concepted to be a ten year game.


And this might change if it isn't successful. By now it looks like a “several weeks“-game.

and by this logic halo is a several days game. so its a step up from their previous franchise. 



Around the Network
S.T.A.G.E. said:


I haven't played it yet, but the devs said the game changes after you hit level twenty so I am guessing there will be more including DLC.


Just think about that statement though.

It takes a good number of hours of tedious gameplay to even achieve level 20. I haven't kept track, but surely I've played over 10 hours and I'm level 18.

That's a lot of hours of playing and waiting for it to become genuinely good.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

bananaking21 said:
walsufnir said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
FiliusDei said:
Destiny does not come close to halo. I feel sorry for bungie but they deserve the low scores.


Perhaps they deserve the score they have currently, but it has been said many times before that Destiny has been concepted to be a ten year game.


And this might change if it isn't successful. By now it looks like a “several weeks“-game.

and by this logic halo is a several days game. so its a step up from their previous franchise. 


Destiny has to prove that it is more worth it. Even nowadays Halo is played in multiplayer while given that 4 was way inferior than previous installments.

I don't know why you are eagerly trying to prove me wrong or to put Destiny in a better light. Don't you like Halo?



bananaking21 said:
walsufnir said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Of course its liberating. MS would've made them make nothing but Halo for their rest of their natural lives. MS doesn't believe in creativity if there arent dollar signs attached to it.


What would you expect? It's the most successful horse in the stable. It's as if Sony would tell Polyphony to not let them make another Gran Turismo.


yeah because sony totally stood in the face of their best studio's making New IP's

What? Where did I say so? This post is way off any logic. I didn't say anything to Sony's first studio development besides PD.



Mr Puggsly said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:


I haven't played it yet, but the devs said the game changes after you hit level twenty so I am guessing there will be more including DLC.


Just think about that statement though.

It takes a good number of hours of tedious gameplay to even achieve level 20. I haven't kept track, but surely I've played over 10 hours and I'm level 18.

That's a lot of hours of playing and waiting for it to become genuinely good.

Well...the game is partially an RPG that is breaking new ground for FPS on consoles. I would expect some grinding going on. Its something console gamers will have to get used to that PC gamers have invested in for years. The lines between are dwindling and this game will be growing over the course of ten years. Expect nothing but expansions for this game. Much like WOW it will see an ebb and flow in value. Lets see if they can hold onto the hype unlike Titanfall which started off strong with hype and dropped the ball past the first two months. 



Puppyroach said:

Once again, what does it have to do with anything if a studio is created for a purpose or bought because of a product they created? The way you look at it is that if they are employed directly, like 343i or Polyphony, they don´t have a will of their own, yet if they are in a former third party studio, free will is all they have. I get the feeling you only put this argument out because it fits the nerrative that Sony can do no wrong. I may be wrong.

You do believe Sony have not put any preassure on ND to produce Uncharted games at a high rate? Or that Polyphone have no choice but to put out new GT games? Compare the variety of ND games from the 90´s to the 00´s and now, fewer and fewer new IP´s. They both do this, MS and Sony are afraid to create new IP´s, that is why they push their strongest developers to keep putting out sequels to their strongest franchises.

How do you feel after saying such blatant lies? Are you hoping that in the flow of the post it would strengthen your argument and nobody would be careful enough to notice that it is simply not true? If anything the opposite is true.

Also there are plenty of new IPs coming, DriveClub, Bloodborne and The Order are both new IPs. Then there is the Guerilla new IP, rumored Santa Monica new IP etc etc. There are also many projects that may or may not be new IPs, such as the game the Bend is working on.