By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - gcube2000 rant: Wii U version of Minecraft "looking doubtful" I call BS

 

Do you want Minecraft on Wii U?

Yes 115 68.45%
 
No 51 30.36%
 
Total:166
ExplodingBlock said:
I agree with everything you said but this has nothing to do with Notch he is not the head of minecraft anymore
But ya if Minecraft came to Wii U I would buy day 1


Notch doesn't work on Minecraft, but he still runs Mojang.



"On my business card I am a corporate president. In my mind I am a game developer. But in my heart I am a gamer." - Satoru Iwata

Around the Network
mii-gamer said:
Who says that they are not working on it now? Maybe they don't want to spill the beans?

Nintendo did hint that they are looking into, or did some of you peeps forget that?

I'll leave the link below

http://kotaku.com/what-nintendos-top-game-creators-think-of-minecraft-1593839008


Nice post man. I think everyone should read what he linked us to.



I bet the Wii U would sell more than 15M LTD by the end of 2015. He bet it would sell less. I lost.

Yeah, Notch has handled the situation very poorly :/



                                                                                                               You're Gonna Carry That Weight.

Xbox One - PS4 - Wii U - PC

Cant really blame them for not wanting to make Minecraft for the Wii U. For whatever reason 3RD Party games don't translate well on it, mainly because IMO ppl that buy it just have it for Nintendo exclusives.

I mean just take a look at the COD: Ghosts Sales...

http://www.vgchartz.com/gamedb/?name=call+of+duty%3A+ghosts

While it sold almost 9 million on the 360 and a little over 8 million on the PS3, with 2.5 million and almost 2 million on the PS4 and XB1 respectively, on the Wii U it didn't even reach a meager 200k copies sold... I was one of the few that bought it for Wii U. Was hard to get a game with a full party besides for Team Deathmatch.

Even though it understandable Minecraft wont be made for it, I sure hope it will and I will buy it.



Dunban67 said:
MDMAlliance said:

Except you're wrong.  Your link is irrelevant because we have information that contradicts what you stated.  No one even needs to read the link to know that.  All they have to know is that Nintendo has been paying to publish not only 3rd party games in the west, but also reached out and completely revived and funded Bayonetta 2, a 3rd party game that was previously only available on PS3 and 360.  It's not even JUST Bayonetta 2, but Devil's Third as well.  No doubt they're doing more than just this, and they have lightened up a LOT in terms of how they handle indie devs and the sort.  All of this information 100% contradicts the statement that Nintendo doesn't chase down 3rd parties to get games, and that Nintendo hasn't "learnt anything."  You need to actually research before you go talking about something you essentially know very little about.

Except those are exclusive deals they made and paid for- which are great but that is hardly indicative of how well they work with 3rd party devs-  it is very obvious to anyone who is willing and able to take an objective look at the issue-  the proof that Nintendo IS the primary if not only issue re lack of 3rs party support -  when business after business either cuts support or. Never bothers in the 1st place-  that is a Nintendo issue and Nintendo problem -   FYI the article In the link by Emily Rogers is an excellent article and very much gives I site into Nintendo s culture and philosophy-  I m sure some things have changed since then but the basic premise seems to still be in place today 

 

The point is not whether or not the games are exclusive (as any console manufacturing company that pays in full for the development of a game would make it exclusive to their console), but the fact that Nintendo is showing an active interest in 3rd party games.  To what extent is another question, but there's no doubt that they have been more active than before.  Not only that, but Nintendo, for the 3rd parties they DO reach out to, do work well with them.  The evidence is there, you just have to look at what some of them say about working with Nintendo.  Admittedly, most of the ones you will find are indie developers but it definitely is a start.  Given Nintendo doesn't have an all-too-bright past with 3rd party developers, it's only natural that a transitioning period will happen (and is what we're seeing right now).  It wont come all at once, and willingness has to come from both sides, not just Nintendo.

And I'm not arguing against the articles insight of Nintendo.  I'm arguing against it as a basis of what Nintendo is TODAY.  It is dated and proof is already there that Nintendo has been taking steps to changing.  Again, I wasn't trying to refute everything said or even make a comment about what is actually inside the article. I'm just pointing out that Nintendo has, indeed, been taking an active part in 3rd party relations (albeit limited).



Around the Network
Euphoria14 said:
I love how many keep thinking that tons of 3rd party devs all decided together as a group to shun Nintendo.

Why can't it be that Nintendo is quite possibly really shitty to work with? At some point you need to stop with the unrelenting defense of everything Nintendo and understand that it is a good possibility that the lack of 3rd party support is their own fault.


I agree Nintendo it is their fault, but disagree as to how it's their fault. Most third party games simply can't compete with Nintendo's games (generally speaking). Some have even admitted this. Nintendo's natural ability to make quality games is a double edged sword..

I fail to see how Nintendo is difficult to work with.. This isn't the NES days.. Nintendo (As far as I know) has no restrictions on the amount of games a dev can release, has really loosened up on censorship lately, and have made every console since the N64 extremely easy to develop for. They have also become a big platform and supporter for indie devs. 



 

"We hold these truths to be self-evident - all men and women created by the, go-you know.. you know the thing!" - Joe Biden

SaberSaurus said:

Don't Wii U owners always say they don't want multiplatform games and only need exclusives?


As a Wii-U owner I will say this. I don't NEED third party games, but I want them. 



Maybe its because Microsoft and Sony are publishing the game for their systems? Nintendo isn't willing to. Don't blame the devs. Blame Nintendo.



Lazy!!!!!!!!!!!
And if nintendo starts doing multiple gamepads....
Then this is HEAVEN!!!!



Pocky Lover Boy! 

Minecraft would probably sell a lot on the Wii U seeing as how it's mainly aimed at kids and kids LOVE Minecraft.

However it is guaranteed to do well on the XBO and sell millions so that's why they are developing for it.