By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Famitsu Review Scores (9/2/14) Xbox One Launch Week

This week’s Famitsu review scores are as follows:

Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 3 (PS3/360) – 8/9/9/9
Chain Chronicle V (PS Vita) – 7/7/7/7
Dead Rising 3 (Xbox One) – 8/9/7/9
Forza Motorsport 5 (Xbox One) – 7/9/8/9
Ryse: Son of Rome (Xbox One) – 8/7/7/7
Crimson Dragon (Xbox One) – 7/7/6/7
Max The Curse of Brotherhood (Xbox One) – 7/8/8/7
Kinect Sports Rivals (Xbox One) – 6/7/7/8
Zumba Fitness World Party (Xbox One) – 7/7/7/6

http://gamingeverything.com/famitsu-review-scores-9214/



Around the Network

I couldn't find an Xbox One Famitsu issue/cover on Google, but this one comes close



Those are some really poor scores, considering Famitsu's track record.



Burek said:
Those are some really poor scores, considering Famitsu's track record.

I don't know why those would be poor scores, but maybe that's because i don't belive in the notion that Famitsu scores are paid like some think! Not everthing needs to be a 10 out of 10 or 40 out of 40 in this case

Also Dead Rising 3 and Forza have good scores.



Seems about what I had expected, DR3 and F5 both doing alright.



Around the Network

what does gears of war have to do with the xbox one?



bananaking21 said:
what does gears of war have to do with the xbox one?

Well it has more to do with it than Mario or some Anime character lol.

Serach for Xbox One and Famitsu on Google and see how you get nothing good for yourself.



They liked Crimson Dragon more than Western reviewers.



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!

KylieDog said:
bubblegamer said:
Burek said:
Those are some really poor scores, considering Famitsu's track record.

I don't know why those would be poor scores, but maybe that's because i don't belive in the notion that Famitsu scores are paid like some think! Not everthing needs to be a 10 out of 10 or 40 out of 40 in this case

Also Dead Rising 3 and Forza have good scores.


Famitsu is a pay to display mag.  Meaning that anything that gets any worthwhile (multiple pages) coverage is because the publisher is paying for it, not that famitsu is just reporting information sent and choosing itself how many pages to devote.

Historically anything that gets major coverage also gets very high scores.  So while scores are not directly paid for, things are clearly not unbiased.

You're right, but isn't that the same as any big gaming website in the west. IGN, Gamespot, Gametrailers, Eurogamer and many others!



Not bad scores but kind of average-ish for Famitsu :P