By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - After the Wii U disaster, will you buy Nintendo's next console?

I have thoroughly enjoyed the Wii U, so I have no concern as to whether or not I will like future Nintendo consoles. The only really major disaster I think Nintendo ever had was cartridges on the N64, because that is precisely what caused them all their major third party support.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Around the Network

not at launch, i will wait till its about half the launch price like i did with wiiu.

which when i look back $200 was a bit much. but i have enjoyed the few games i have.



 

Yup, I will still buy it, barring something totally unexpected or crazy happening. I didn't buy at a Wii U launch (or any home console, really...) but like, you throw some solid Nintendo games on a system, and it's hard for me to not get it eventually. Also, with unified Wii U/3DS development which should make it easier for both 1st-party and 3rd-party devs, and presumably even more improvements on previous systems and such (and hopefully a better name, come on Nintendo) I'd like to think that Nintendo will have caught up to other systems even more.

I don't expect a blu-ray player/all-in-1 entertainment system or anything, I just want to get as enjoyable an experience out of my console as possible. Something simple but effective. I want to have lots of options available, but not be annoyed by them. Stuff like that~!

EDIT: "(Next Handheld only with better screen-resolution. Does not need high-polygon-counts, but even cheap phones now have HD-Displays.)"

 

oh yeah, and a 16:9 aspect ratio would be nice too^. Doesn't have to be HD for me (the bigger the screen, the harder it is to dev etc. for it) but that would be great. I don't really mind the 3DS as it is, but it's sort of non-standard and odd, so it only makes sense to do what everyone else is doing... and I imagine if they intend to unify development, they won't have any choice but to go with a... normal aspect ratio. ._.



spurgeonryan said:
ZyroXZ2 said:
I'm going to go ahead and title-comment on this one:

The Wii U is not a "disaster".

And yes, I will buy every console Nintendo makes until the day I die because I grew up with their games as a kid, and it's only fitting I pass away with their games as an old man.


Then what do you consider a disaster? Does a disaster have to equal virtual boy? You can come back from a eisaster, that was an extinction level event. 

 

Yes?

Considering I actually played with someone elses's Virtual Boy (omg, that sounds so wrong now that I'm typing it!), that was by far one of the more "experimental" things Nintendo has ever done (and we're talking Power Glove stuff here, lol).

A disaster is the nail in the coffin.  The Wii U, in no way, spells the end of Nintendo.  The Dreamcast is closer to a "disaster" than the Wii U, because it was Sega's last chance, and since it put their hardware division and almost the entire company out of business, THAT is a nail in the coffin.

The Wii U isn't even outpacing the Dreamcast, but it's far from tanking Nintendo... VERY far from it.



Check out my entertainment gaming channel!
^^/

The Wii U is turning out to be my favorite console from Nintendo. I love Mario Kart 8 and love the games in HD. I still own a PS3 but mostly use that for watching blu-rays nowadays. I would love to own either a PS4 or Xbox One, especially for Halo MCC and 5. However, I doubt it will replace the Wii U as my number 1 console. When I do have the money to purchase either one I'll make a final decision. So, to answer the question, it's a definite YES, I will buy Nintendo's next home console!!



Around the Network
ZyroXZ2 said:
spurgeonryan said:
ZyroXZ2 said:
I'm going to go ahead and title-comment on this one:

The Wii U is not a "disaster".

And yes, I will buy every console Nintendo makes until the day I die because I grew up with their games as a kid, and it's only fitting I pass away with their games as an old man.


Then what do you consider a disaster? Does a disaster have to equal virtual boy? You can come back from a eisaster, that was an extinction level event. 

 

Yes?

Considering I actually played with someone elses's Virtual Boy (omg, that sounds so wrong now that I'm typing it!), that was by far one of the more "experimental" things Nintendo has ever done (and we're talking Power Glove stuff here, lol).

A disaster is the nail in the coffin.  The Wii U, in no way, spells the end of Nintendo.  The Dreamcast is closer to a "disaster" than the Wii U, because it was Sega's last chance, and since it put their hardware division and almost the entire company out of business, THAT is a nail in the coffin.

The Wii U isn't even outpacing the Dreamcast, but it's far from tanking Nintendo... VERY far from it.


I don't think the Dreamcast was a disaster. As I said in other posts, Sega Saturn killed Sega's hardware business, not Dreamcast. It was too late for Dreamcast to do anything about. In fact, Sega had actually planned to leave the hardware business after the Dreamcast. The only reason Dreamcast saw the light of day at all was so Sega could restore it's reputation amongst consumers, which given that they were such a brand-driven company back then, it was actually a smart move.

 

Also, I wouldn't necessarily call Wii U a disaster. Unless it starts doing as badly as the Sega Saturn (with both sales and finances), then it's more like an underperforming console. It's true that Virtual Boy was a disaster, but that was a disaster that wasn't too much of a financial burden and since it was seen as being less important than the Game Boy or N64, it could be killed of and buried rather quickly. 

That being said, hell yeah I would buy the next Nintendo console. Wii U without a doubt has the single best software lineup of any 8th gen consoles far and given what's coming out next year, it looks like it'll be that way for some time. If this is what an underperforming Nintendo console will give us, then I would rather them not have the #1 console anymore.



Check out my art blog: http://jon-erich-art.blogspot.com

Jon-Erich said:


I don't think the Dreamcast was a disaster. As I said in other posts, Sega Saturn killed Sega's hardware business, not Dreamcast. It was too late for Dreamcast to do anything about. In fact, Sega had actually planned to leave the hardware business after the Dreamcast. The only reason Dreamcast saw the light of day at all was so Sega could restore it's reputation amongst consumers, which given that they were such a brand-driven company back then, it was actually a smart move.

 

Also, I wouldn't necessarily call Wii U a disaster. Unless it starts doing as badly as the Sega Saturn (with both sales and finances), then it's more like an underperforming console. It's true that Virtual Boy was a disaster, but that was a disaster that wasn't too much of a financial burden and since it was seen as being less important than the Game Boy or N64, it could be killed of and buried rather quickly. 

That being said, hell yeah I would buy the next Nintendo console. Wii U without a doubt has the single best software lineup of any 8th gen consoles far and given what's coming out next year, it looks like it'll be that way for some time. If this is what an underperforming Nintendo console will give us, then I would rather them not have the #1 console anymore.

I can agree that the Sega Saturn was the first nail in the coffin, but the Dreamcast shouldn't have seen the light of day, not in that situation.  It was too big of a risk to try and bank on that last system being any sort of savior (which I think is what they were hoping; no company releases a system for the sake of "consumers" knowing it will put them nearly out of business).



Check out my entertainment gaming channel!
^^/

The 32X + Saturn killed Sega, Dreamcast was a decent attempt to right the ship but it was too fargone by that point.

I still enjoyed the Dreamcast quite a bit.



Shadow1980 said:
The Saturn was definitely the iceberg to Sega's Titanic. It was an utter failure in the West thanks to a bungled launch, high price, and lackluster library, and though it was Sega's best-selling console in Japan, it was still niche, selling only 6 million units. In the U.S. it sold only 1.36 million lifetime, and in Europe it was less than that. Globally it didn't even hit 10 million units. With practically nonexistent handheld division (the Game Gear was essentially dead sales-wise and the Nomad was basically a handheld Genesis, and it sold terribly as well) Sega didn't have anything to fall back on, either. The Dreamcast was doomed from the beginning. At that point Sega had no choice but to cut their losses and withdraw from making hardware. The Saturn was just a big expensive disaster.

For all of its struggles, the Wii U is no Saturn. It's sold far more rapidly than the Saturn, having already far exceeded the Saturn's lifetime sales in the U.S. and Europe. The hardware was not a significant loss leader, and apparently it's overall profitable now. Sales have been improving somewhat as well, though they're still low. Nintendo also has a successful handheld division to bolster the company's hardware sales. Finally, Nintendo is a very solvent company capable of weathering losses like those incurred by the Wii U for probably two more decades before they went bankrupt. While the Wii U isn't a success by any stretch, it's far from a Saturn-level disaster and will likely sell about double what the Saturn did and will likely net Nintendo a modest profit in the long run. Nintendo is in no danger of being forced to exit the hardware business like Sega was.


all good, but what about the HOME console buisness? serious question.



Nyeguy81 said:
After this thread disaster, will you write another one?


Hopefully, the thread will be endless.