I agree w you- although I really wish they had done the 1st 4 items on the list from the start-  particularly longer batt life and a greater range-  what is the point in a "tablet like" device that has no more range than a Wii mote and batt life that is truly constricting 

Fuck no.
They'd be flushing their home console business down the toilet if they did that.

That's never going to happen and and they'd be pissing on their fans if they did that.

So either everyone who suggest this are morons or no one remembers the Sega CD and Sega Saturn and the extremely early release of the Dreamcast that pretty much killed third party for Sega....

This is a sure fire way to lose all the third party they have left and the support base.

I can stand outside in my backyard and still play games. My Wii U shoots that video signal through cement and ground of my basement, no lag. I really have no idea why people complain about range. Dont be stupid with it. It's the same requirements as other things. Don't stick it in the middle of metal shelves make sure  there is no interferance (like similar wireless ranges) in the area. Hell the PS3 wifi is greatly effected by cedar wood 

No, screw fragmentation. The best part of buying consoles is knowing that you will be able to play games on it even five or six years later. The New 3DS was bad enough, but please leave fragmentation the hell away from the Wii U.

I could imagine one with a restyled gamepad with better battery and screen one day. Maybe with a harddrive.

If they want to shoot themselves in the foot, sure, why not? Otherwise, no.

No, but maybe a new revision with ethernet port, SATA3 slot and longer battery life.

better battery life
more storage

Yes



everything else


NO