Smear-Gel said:
Zod95 said:
If they see something wrong and put it right they are not ignoring it, are they? I just think it's much better to be constructive and improve what is faulty but has potential than to waste it and be stuck on a negative and destructive position.
To me, people that criticize the details of a good message is most probably because they are not comfortable with that message and want to destroy it (or at least cloud it).
Regarding the importance of the details, that's just my opinion (see the underlined).
|
When a "good" message takes it's foundation in details that are literally completely wrong, then most of the time it's silly to ignore the details.
If I said the PS4 is selling well, then said it was because of hype and sony fanboys only, my main point is true, right? So no-one can have issue with my details and say so?
But that's fact. The PS4 is selling well.
This is a thread that states an opinion, and sets out to prove it with examples. That arent right. How can having issue with the very things used to PROVE the basis be "silly nitpicking" at all?
Zod95 said:
To me, people that criticize the details of a good message is most probably because they are not comfortable with that message and want to destroy it (or at least cloud it).
|
To return the favour, I'd say dismissing issues with an argument as "nitpicking" happens with people who dont want to come to terms with thier view just not actually being right. I'm not saying that's the case here, just responding specifically to that.
|
PS4 selling well is not a good message once everybody knows that. But if you'd tell me half of its sales were from female gamers that buy the console on Monday mornings, that would be very interesting on itself regardless of why or how or any other details you would add. I couldn't care less if they bought it because of Killzone or Watch Dogs. And, if I saw people focusing on that too much, I would think it was because they didn't want for us to realize that PS4 was a console for girls and what is happening on Monday mornings.
People can raise issues with whatever they want. But sometimes they are rather pulling the wool over our eyes than anything else.
I got that you find the details to be more important than the message (so you came up with an example where it was the case). But I find it the other way around (hence in my example the message is far more important) and, believe me, I really don't care about those details of who is responsible for the situation (Iwata, Miyamoto or any other guy I've never met and can't even pronounce the name). I only care about the situation itself: Nintendo is closing up on itself and its native market and both are declining. That is relevant for me as a gamer, not what is happening with the human resources of a company I neither own nor work at.
Prediction made in 14/01/2014 for 31/12/2020: PS4: 100M XOne: 70M WiiU: 25M
Prediction made in 01/04/2016 for 31/12/2020: PS4: 100M XOne: 50M WiiU: 18M
Prediction made in 15/04/2017 for 31/12/2020: PS4: 90M XOne: 40M WiiU: 15M Switch: 20M
Prediction made in 24/03/2018 for 31/12/2020: PS4: 110M XOne: 50M WiiU: 14M Switch: 65M