By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Do you have interest in/like ANY nintendo game?

binary solo said:
ninjaman003 said:
binary solo said:
I thought I would like LoZ, I wanted to like LoZ, then I played OoT 3DS and thought wtf!?! Why do people think this very ordinary game is the best game evah? Perhaps something was lost in translation and I would have actually liked it if I'd played it on GC.

LoZ was the only Nintendo franchise that really interested me and now not even that interests me.

It was on the N64, not Gamecube. I'm not exactly sure how you find it more ordinary than other games. I played on 3ds. It's not my favorite game ever, but it's definitely up there. 

OK, point is it was originally on a console I never owned.

Perhaps it was because all the major hype around it being the best game of all time and topping many "100 best games of all time" lists. So when my son got 3DS I was really really excited to finally play this greatest ever game to grace any video game platform ever.

I gave the game a decent enough number of hours to impress me but there was nothing, nothing at all about it that I found engaging or entertaining. It wasn't bad, it was simply ordinary. My son loved it, so it was a worthwhile purchase, just no for me.

Pokemon is the only Nintendo game that actually drew me in, odd because I can't for the life of me figure out why kept wanting to play it. Unfortunately for Nintendo they made the game (Diamond I think) impossible to have 2 game saves on one cartridge. So basically because my son had his own game going, all I could do is basically play the game for a short time but not actually have a game save of my own. Which means once I put it down I had no desire to pick it up again. Nintendo's own form of DRM, but this time it's GRM within the family, as opposed to preventing used game sales, weird. I've had my Pokemon experience, became weirdly addicted for a brief period, and now I'm over it.

?... interesting story I guess. I agree that oot is overrated, but I don't see how you found it incredibly ordinary. I though it was a great game, just not number 1 of all time. Probably not even my top 10.



Around the Network
Brotherstotheend said:
my ds light and dolphin is enough to get my nitendofix, especially since they are not releasing that many "new" titles


what nintendo do is use old ip's such as mario and add new gameplay mechanics to that franchise, take mario galaxy for example, its no where near the mario sunshine in gameplay terms, i am really suprised that splatoon does not have any major nintendo characters in it, and im really suprised its not called mario paintballing



old skool

mZuzek said:
binary solo said:

Pokemon is the only Nintendo game that actually drew me in, odd because I can't for the life of me figure out why kept wanting to play it. Unfortunately for Nintendo they made the game (Diamond I think) impossible to have 2 game saves on one cartridge. So basically because my son had his own game going, all I could do is basically play the game for a short time but not actually have a game save of my own. Which means once I put it down I had no desire to pick it up again. Nintendo's own form of DRM, but this time it's GRM within the family, as opposed to preventing used game sales, weird. I've had my Pokemon experience, became weirdly addicted for a brief period, and now I'm over it.

Every Pokémon game works like this, actually. And don't blame Nintendo for it - they're not the ones who make the games.

Doesn't make it right or reasonable.

Nintendo's the publisher, and if they don't own the IP directly they own all the rights to all intents and purposes. Which means DRM is ultimately the decision of Nintendo not the game maker. If Nintendo said, "make multiple game saves happen" it would happen. If they simply don't give any direction on this it means they tacitly support this form of DRM, which is as worthy of criticism as any pther form of DRM. But it's Nintendo so they get a free pass on it.

It really is one of the reasons I said "fug dis game". If I'd actually been able to play through the whole of Diamond without having to buy my own game, when my son already has it, I may have been very encouraging of (and maybe even contributed to) buying the next game, and the next and the next. As the financial powerhouse of my home I was put off and so I became negatively disposed towards future Pokemon purchases, which means no further Pokemon games have been purchased.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

binary solo said:
mZuzek said:
binary solo said:

Pokemon is the only Nintendo game that actually drew me in, odd because I can't for the life of me figure out why kept wanting to play it. Unfortunately for Nintendo they made the game (Diamond I think) impossible to have 2 game saves on one cartridge. So basically because my son had his own game going, all I could do is basically play the game for a short time but not actually have a game save of my own. Which means once I put it down I had no desire to pick it up again. Nintendo's own form of DRM, but this time it's GRM within the family, as opposed to preventing used game sales, weird. I've had my Pokemon experience, became weirdly addicted for a brief period, and now I'm over it.

Every Pokémon game works like this, actually. And don't blame Nintendo for it - they're not the ones who make the games.

Doesn't make it right or reasonable.

Nintendo's the publisher, and if they don't own the IP directly they own all the rights to all intents and purposes. Which means DRM is ultimately the decision of Nintendo not the game maker. If Nintendo said, "make multiple game saves happen" it would happen. If they simply don't give any direction on this it means they tacitly support this form of DRM, which is as worthy of criticism as any pther form of DRM. But it's Nintendo so they get a free pass on it.

It really is one of the reasons I said "fug dis game". If I'd actually been able to play through the whole of Diamond without having to buy my own game, when my son already has it, I may have been very encouraging of (and maybe even contributed to) buying the next game, and the next and the next. As the financial powerhouse of my home I was put off and so I became negatively disposed towards future Pokemon purchases, which means no further Pokemon games have been purchased.

That's a really bad reason to not buy any more Pokemon games. The reason they didn't start out with more than one file was because of limitations on the GameBoy. That's no excuse now, but if you both wanted to play it all the time, would you really want to share it. Again it's not an amazing reason, but there is some.



Its basically their style!
Not everyone will love those bloody, violence, amazing voice acting, cgi scenes, good story.
If i wanna watch stuff that has them, i would watch a movie, tv show or an anime.

Nintendo does stuff which other companies dont.



Pocky Lover Boy! 

Around the Network
ninjaman003 said:
binary solo said:
ninjaman003 said:
binary solo said:
I thought I would like LoZ, I wanted to like LoZ, then I played OoT 3DS and thought wtf!?! Why do people think this very ordinary game is the best game evah? Perhaps something was lost in translation and I would have actually liked it if I'd played it on GC.

LoZ was the only Nintendo franchise that really interested me and now not even that interests me.

It was on the N64, not Gamecube. I'm not exactly sure how you find it more ordinary than other games. I played on 3ds. It's not my favorite game ever, but it's definitely up there. 

OK, point is it was originally on a console I never owned.

Perhaps it was because all the major hype around it being the best game of all time and topping many "100 best games of all time" lists. So when my son got 3DS I was really really excited to finally play this greatest ever game to grace any video game platform ever.

I gave the game a decent enough number of hours to impress me but there was nothing, nothing at all about it that I found engaging or entertaining. It wasn't bad, it was simply ordinary. My son loved it, so it was a worthwhile purchase, just no for me.

Pokemon is the only Nintendo game that actually drew me in, odd because I can't for the life of me figure out why kept wanting to play it. Unfortunately for Nintendo they made the game (Diamond I think) impossible to have 2 game saves on one cartridge. So basically because my son had his own game going, all I could do is basically play the game for a short time but not actually have a game save of my own. Which means once I put it down I had no desire to pick it up again. Nintendo's own form of DRM, but this time it's GRM within the family, as opposed to preventing used game sales, weird. I've had my Pokemon experience, became weirdly addicted for a brief period, and now I'm over it.

?... interesting story I guess. I agree that oot is overrated, but I don't see how you found it incredibly ordinary. I though it was a great game, just not number 1 of all time. Probably not even my top 10.

There were a couple of little moments that I found to be completely ridiculous, contrived and turned to game into a bit of a joke for me. Like that dude sleeping by the castle moat(?) that you had to try to wake up, by running off and ... do something... you couldn't just kick him in the arse and tell him to move is lazy butt?

The game did absolutely nothing for me, it was like eating a bland meal. Nothing truly awful about it, but nothing good either.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

raidinglarastomb said:
Brotherstotheend said:
my ds light and dolphin is enough to get my nitendofix, especially since they are not releasing that many "new" titles


what nintendo do is use old ip's such as mario and add new gameplay mechanics to that franchise, take mario galaxy for example, its no where near the mario sunshine in gameplay terms, i am really suprised that splatoon does not have any major nintendo characters in it, and im really suprised its not called mario paintballing

You came over to this thread too? suspicious.



binary solo said:

 OK, point is it was originally on a console I never owned.

Perhaps it was because all the major hype around it being the best game of all time and topping many "100 best games of all time" lists. So when my son got 3DS I was really really excited to finally play this greatest ever game to grace any video game platform ever.

I gave the game a decent enough number of hours to impress me but there was nothing, nothing at all about it that I found engaging or entertaining. It wasn't bad, it was simply ordinary. My son loved it, so it was a worthwhile purchase, just no for me.

Pokemon is the only Nintendo game that actually drew me in, odd because I can't for the life of me figure out why kept wanting to play it. Unfortunately for Nintendo they made the game (Diamond I think) impossible to have 2 game saves on one cartridge. So basically because my son had his own game going, all I could do is basically play the game for a short time but not actually have a game save of my own. Which means once I put it down I had no desire to pick it up again. Nintendo's own form of DRM, but this time it's GRM within the family, as opposed to preventing used game sales, weird. I've had my Pokemon experience, became weirdly addicted for a brief period, and now I'm over it.

This is interesting. I remember when i bought it on release day back in 1998. The hype was unbelievable and there was something that just blew my mind about it back then. It was like nothing anyone had seen before. It would seem almost every third person action game/adventure game have borrowed something from it since, and going back to it recently with the 3DS version,  i naturally got the same feeling you did. 

Strangely enough, i still feel A Link to the Past still holds up amazingly well, and it still blows me away even to this day.

But OOT isn't alone in giving me this feeling when revisited. The same holds true for Final Fantasy 7. This vid perfectly illustrate my point:

I guess you just had to be there at the time.



binary solo said:
ninjaman003 said:
binary solo said:
ninjaman003 said:
binary solo said:
I thought I would like LoZ, I wanted to like LoZ, then I played OoT 3DS and thought wtf!?! Why do people think this very ordinary game is the best game evah? Perhaps something was lost in translation and I would have actually liked it if I'd played it on GC.

LoZ was the only Nintendo franchise that really interested me and now not even that interests me.

It was on the N64, not Gamecube. I'm not exactly sure how you find it more ordinary than other games. I played on 3ds. It's not my favorite game ever, but it's definitely up there. 

OK, point is it was originally on a console I never owned.

Perhaps it was because all the major hype around it being the best game of all time and topping many "100 best games of all time" lists. So when my son got 3DS I was really really excited to finally play this greatest ever game to grace any video game platform ever.

I gave the game a decent enough number of hours to impress me but there was nothing, nothing at all about it that I found engaging or entertaining. It wasn't bad, it was simply ordinary. My son loved it, so it was a worthwhile purchase, just no for me.

Pokemon is the only Nintendo game that actually drew me in, odd because I can't for the life of me figure out why kept wanting to play it. Unfortunately for Nintendo they made the game (Diamond I think) impossible to have 2 game saves on one cartridge. So basically because my son had his own game going, all I could do is basically play the game for a short time but not actually have a game save of my own. Which means once I put it down I had no desire to pick it up again. Nintendo's own form of DRM, but this time it's GRM within the family, as opposed to preventing used game sales, weird. I've had my Pokemon experience, became weirdly addicted for a brief period, and now I'm over it.

?... interesting story I guess. I agree that oot is overrated, but I don't see how you found it incredibly ordinary. I though it was a great game, just not number 1 of all time. Probably not even my top 10.

There were a couple of little moments that I found to be completely ridiculous, contrived and turned to game into a bit of a joke for me. Like that dude sleeping by the castle moat(?) that you had to try to wake up, by running off and ... do something... you couldn't just kick him in the arse and tell him to move is lazy butt?

The game did absolutely nothing for me, it was like eating a bland meal. Nothing truly awful about it, but nothing good either.

Just out of curiousity, what do you look for in a game?



paper mario and super smash bros.