By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales Discussion - When will PS4 reach 10 million sold? - ioi comments on undertracking

Phronesis said:
People wanted explanations. ioi gave us, now they complain.
Fuck logic.

Really, people? How hard is to understand that just adding numbers is not the solution, Sony won't give a report specifying their sales, so it's not simple. This site is not 100% accurate because they use their sources to ESTIMATE the sales. And for a free service, I think they do a good job.

Logic? You say, well ioi, just stated in front of everyone in this thread, that he does not accept  data from the companies themselves unless an indipendant 3rd party can confirm the data, well as I just pointed out before Sony went on stage insider derp already listed the sales of the PS4 over 10 million sold through, does that count or only certain 3rd party tracking services only?

 

What if the people here demand ioi data to be confirmed by another source outside VGchartz, you know to make it fair and above board. You see how funny that Sounds, on one of the freaking largest game conventions infront of freaking millions, an there was a press release to boot, but yet ..what do we hear, we need another source to confirm this..

http://www.sys-con.com/node/3145647



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.

Around the Network

http://blog.us.playstation.com/2014/08/12/ps4-10-million-and-going-strong/

Playstation Blog posted by SHAWN LAYDEN

We just announced that the PlayStation 4 has sold through more than 10 million units worldwide –- and more than 30 million PS4 games have been sold –- since its launch less than nine months ago. It’s a remarkable milestone that reinforces PS4’s record-breaking pace and the movement it has created among players globally in defining next generation gaming.

On behalf of our entire team, I want to thank you for your support and passion. You’re the reason that PS4 is the #1 next generation console in the world and we’re grateful for your continued enthusiasm and for always pushing us to new heights.

Rest assured that the PS4 journey has just begun, and we’ll continue the momentum this holiday season with blockbuster titles, including Destiny, DRIVECLUB, Grand Theft Auto V, inFAMOUS First Light, Little Big Planet 3, and NBA 2K15, and innovative titles including Grim Fandango, Hotline Miami 2: Wrong Number and Minecraft.

In addition to our expanding gaming library, we’ll also continue to enhance the PS4 system’s network features to offer more breakthrough gaming experiences. Upcoming features include the ability to upload game footage directly to YouTube, and also “Share Play,” a new feature that allows players to invite a friend to a game—even when they don’t own a copy of it.

I look forward to sharing more details about new games and features coming to PS4 that clearly demonstrate why PlayStation is the best place to play.

Shawn



Do they need to hand-deliver? I don't understand.



overman1 said:
Phronesis said:
People wanted explanations. ioi gave us, now they complain.
Fuck logic.

Really, people? How hard is to understand that just adding numbers is not the solution, Sony won't give a report specifying their sales, so it's not simple. This site is not 100% accurate because they use their sources to ESTIMATE the sales. And for a free service, I think they do a good job.


I really dont think people expect VGChartz to the 100% accurate. If you read back to ioi's originial post. it seemed He was isinuating that most likely Sony was "lying" about their numbers than his own accuracy about the sales figures. I really think that is what got people riled up. Everyone knows this site isnt perfect but I guess he worded his sentence wrong. 

He didn't say Sony was lying, he says they can't follow the statement blindly because the numbers must match with other sources.

The same rules apply to any company. Imagine the following scenario: the amount of sales creates perception about the product. People believe that the bestseller is obviously the better product. So Sony or Microsoft could easily say that they sold 30 million. It's a very positive number.

They don't need to specify their reports since they are secret.

They don't need to explain anything.

But this site does.

Don't worry, Sony is not lying, but so long VGChartz need multiple sources to specify which regions are buying and other details, they can't take Sony as the only source. Where is the system selling? Japan? Nobody knows. So they add sales to that graphic and what happens to the others sales projection? They break.

It's a matter of security and trustworthy as much as a college works can't use a single specialist as source, it would be considered a biased work and your teachers won't give an A+ for it.



3DS, Wii, PSP, Vita, PS2, PS3, PS4 & Steam.

Add an extra column "Magic Console Dust", 600,000 units.



Around the Network
ioi said:
joeorc said:

Congrats, you been doing this for 10 years, but do you think its Quite a bit of Arrogance on your part to claim, that unless you can get data backed up by another party for that data, what about your Data? You can choose to run that way, if you want but if no other 3rd party can confirm this Data as you said, than does that than point to claiming you do not trust the companies data that they have? So if sony asked to see your data, would you show them your break down method?

I'm struggling to make much sense of this paragraph.

We actually provide data to Sony - they are a VGChartz Pro client - so yes we would give them a full breakdown of our methodology if requested. I'm not sure how that is relevant to this conversation though? I wouldn't expect any client to use our data and assume it is 100% accurate and would welcome them comparing it with other sources - I don't really understand where the arrogance is in this.


Since they are a pro client will they eventually tell you where that 600k came from? I assume you've already asked them.



http://www.youtube.com/v/AoOOpLpcF28 http://www.youtube.com/v/CphFZGH5030

All Hail the Jester King. The King is back, and I am still a dirty girl prof ;)

ioi said:
joeorc said:

Congrats, you been doing this for 10 years, but do you think its Quite a bit of Arrogance on your part to claim, that unless you can get data backed up by another party for that data, what about your Data? You can choose to run that way, if you want but if no other 3rd party can confirm this Data as you said, than does that than point to claiming you do not trust the companies data that they have? So if sony asked to see your data, would you show them your break down method?

I'm struggling to make much sense of this paragraph.

We actually provide data to Sony - they are a VGChartz Pro client - so yes we would give them a full breakdown of our methodology if requested. I'm not sure how that is relevant to this conversation though? I wouldn't expect any client to use our data and assume it is 100% accurate and would welcome them comparing it with other sources - I don't really understand where the arrogance is in this.

Well and being Sony a customer of Pro (they probably subscribe to all trackers with decent enough methodology and credentials) they are probably quite aware of the inaccuracies on their numbers and accept that as what the site promises trends and ballpark, and mainly a good idea of competitors.

Anyway I think you already saw that at least in this thread most are being polite and accept that there are a margin of error in the estimative and their problem is either on how you worded the "if sony is to be trusted" not that matter, you have the right to be confident in your numbers... and the sensible users accept that first you need to find were the deviations are to correct them.

But Sony claim of over 10M sold through in 10th of August aligned with 10M+- shipped on June 30th is pretty solid for me.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Phronesis said:
overman1 said:
Phronesis said:
People wanted explanations. ioi gave us, now they complain.
Fuck logic.

Really, people? How hard is to understand that just adding numbers is not the solution, Sony won't give a report specifying their sales, so it's not simple. This site is not 100% accurate because they use their sources to ESTIMATE the sales. And for a free service, I think they do a good job.


I really dont think people expect VGChartz to the 100% accurate. If you read back to ioi's originial post. it seemed He was isinuating that most likely Sony was "lying" about their numbers than his own accuracy about the sales figures. I really think that is what got people riled up. Everyone knows this site isnt perfect but I guess he worded his sentence wrong. 

He didn't say Sony was lying, he says they can't follow the statement blindly because the numbers must match with other sources.

The same rules apply to any company. Imagine the following scenario: the amount of sales creates perception about the product. People believe that the bestseller is obviously the better product. So Sony or Microsoft could easily say that they sold 30 million. It's a very positive number.

They don't need to specify their reports since they are secret.

They don't need to explain anything.

But this site does.

Don't worry, Sony is not lying, but so long VGChartz need multiple sources to specify which regions are buying and other details, they can't take Sony as the only source. Where is the system selling? Japan? Nobody knows. So they add sales to that graphic and what happens to the others sales projection? They break.

It's a matter of security and trustworthy as much as a college works can't use a single specialist as source, it would be considered a biased work and your teachers won't give an A+ for it.

"if Sony's number are to be trusted"

sounds more to me like he insinuating that Sony may be untrue in their sales projections (may not be so though). The problem is that VGChartz is almost never right about their own trackings. ioi himself told me he uses the number of new XBL and PSN accounts to estimate his trackings. 

with this method, what about countries in Tier 2 areas like eastern europe or South Africa or India where the internet might be terrible or non-existent but the PS4 is still selling quite well? The problem is that it really seems like the tracking system on this site is lacking severely.  However, It gives out estimates and most certainly the leading console on VGChartz is always the leading console (even when the gaps arent always correct) when the official data is released so people still stick to this site

Also the community isnt too shabby either. 



ioi said:
overman1 said:

He was isinuating that most likely Sony was "lying" about their numbers. 

I never insinuated that they were lying, merely that it was an estimate and will carry a margin of error and uncertainty.

Which is a standpoint that I don't believe anybody has (or can) refute.

Sure sony estimate have errors, but since they didn't gave a exact number like 10.2M... just a over 10M i'm pretty sure their margin of error is small enough for us to accept 10M as good enough, or would you say your 600k under is closer to the "exact number" than Sony because of the sum of the 3rd parties tracker with your estimative of RofTW?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

ioi said:
overman1 said:

He was isinuating that most likely Sony was "lying" about their numbers. 

I never insinuated that they were lying, merely that it was an estimate and will carry a margin of error and uncertainty.

Which is a standpoint that I don't believe anybody has (or can) refute.

well, I apologize for that. might have unduly accused you of something you didnt intend but I need to ask a question.

How do you track the other 60+ regions not listed on the homepage of this site where the PS4 is currently selling?