By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Diff between PS4/XB1 > PS3/360

Shinobi-san on 08 August 2014

So much misinformation getting spread in this thread..its not even funny. To anyone who thinks that last gen's gap was bigger than this gen, you are completely clueless about tech.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

Around the Network
2008ProchargedGT on 08 August 2014
Mr.Playstation said:
No, the difference in visuals and framerate was much larger in the seventh generation then it is now.

I mena this can even be seen in games releasing later in the Gen such as Dark souls 2 which ran at around 40 fps on the 360 and under 30fps under the ps3. Another example includes most cod games which looked much better on the 360 and ran at mostly a higher framerate. When looking at most ps3 and xbox 360 games you can see that most ps3 games were only upscaled up to 720p meanwhile all 360 games were upscaled up too 1080p which made them look much better.

So you think a ~10 FPS diff last gen is larger than the diff this gen? Did tomb raider avg about 20 fps more on the PS4 and ran at a higher resolution? I would say thats a bigger diff



MoHasanie on 08 August 2014

Yeah I've seen many people do that and its annoying cause its not true.



    

NNID: FrequentFlyer54

2008ProchargedGT on 08 August 2014
Shinobi-san said:
So much misinformation getting spread in this thread..its not even funny. To anyone who thinks that last gen's gap was bigger than this gen, you are completely clueless about tech.


This is what im saying. Why do people refuse to beleive tthis when the numbers are smacking you right in the face?



Mr.Playstation on 08 August 2014
2008ProchargedGT said:
Mr.Playstation said:
No, the difference in visuals and framerate was much larger in the seventh generation then it is now.

I mena this can even be seen in games releasing later in the Gen such as Dark souls 2 which ran at around 40 fps on the 360 and under 30fps under the ps3. Another example includes most cod games which looked much better on the 360 and ran at mostly a higher framerate. When looking at most ps3 and xbox 360 games you can see that most ps3 games were only upscaled up to 720p meanwhile all 360 games were upscaled up too 1080p which made them look much better.

So you think a ~10 FPS diff last gen is larger than the diff this gen? Did tomb raider avg about 20 fps more on the PS4 and ran at a higher resolution? I would say thats a bigger diff

No, I am just saying that the difference contiued up to the end of last gen with games looking better and playing better on the xbox 360. This was far more noticible earlier in the same gen. I mean did you see Bayonetta (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZg8ebaARmY) .



Send a Friend Request On PSN :P

Around the Network
2008ProchargedGT on 08 August 2014
Mr.Playstation said:
2008ProchargedGT said:
Mr.Playstation said:
No, the difference in visuals and framerate was much larger in the seventh generation then it is now.

I mena this can even be seen in games releasing later in the Gen such as Dark souls 2 which ran at around 40 fps on the 360 and under 30fps under the ps3. Another example includes most cod games which looked much better on the 360 and ran at mostly a higher framerate. When looking at most ps3 and xbox 360 games you can see that most ps3 games were only upscaled up to 720p meanwhile all 360 games were upscaled up too 1080p which made them look much better.

So you think a ~10 FPS diff last gen is larger than the diff this gen? Did tomb raider avg about 20 fps more on the PS4 and ran at a higher resolution? I would say thats a bigger diff

 

No, I am just saying that the difference contiued up to the end of last gen with games looking better and playing better on the xbox 360. This was far more noticible earlier in the same gen. I mean did you see Bayonetta (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZg8ebaARmY) .

 


Ive seen you use this game in defense before and as I said in the OP exlcude the exceptions be cause they are not the norm. To counter have you seen FF13 o.O



Mr.Playstation on 08 August 2014
2008ProchargedGT said:
Mr.Playstation said:
2008ProchargedGT said:
Mr.Playstation said:
No, the difference in visuals and framerate was much larger in the seventh generation then it is now.

I mena this can even be seen in games releasing later in the Gen such as Dark souls 2 which ran at around 40 fps on the 360 and under 30fps under the ps3. Another example includes most cod games which looked much better on the 360 and ran at mostly a higher framerate. When looking at most ps3 and xbox 360 games you can see that most ps3 games were only upscaled up to 720p meanwhile all 360 games were upscaled up too 1080p which made them look much better.

So you think a ~10 FPS diff last gen is larger than the diff this gen? Did tomb raider avg about 20 fps more on the PS4 and ran at a higher resolution? I would say thats a bigger diff

 

No, I am just saying that the difference contiued up to the end of last gen with games looking better and playing better on the xbox 360. This was far more noticible earlier in the same gen. I mean did you see Bayonetta (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZg8ebaARmY) .

 


Ive seen you use this game in defense before and as I said in the OP exlcude the exceptions be cause they are not the norm. To counter have you seen FF13 o.O


I'm sorry about using this defense twice it's just that bayonetta is a game which without further inquiry I could easily point out the difference between multiplatform last gen games. But if I exclude the norm then you can't use Tomb raider as it's the only game with a lower resolution and framerate on the xbox one. Honestly we can practically say that the amount of difference is the same on both generations.

Last gen saw the ps3 getting lower resolution games with worse framerates meanwhile the tables have turned this generation and games run at a lower resolution and run with worse framerates on the xbox one. 

P.S: I'm a Sony fan so I am by far not trying to protect the xbox one, I think that the console is a third wheel this Gen since now it is the same as the ps4 though it is receiving too much hate, since it runs multiplatform games by far much better than how the ps3 ran multiplatform games when compared to the Xbox 360.



Send a Friend Request On PSN :P

CDiablo on 08 August 2014

Most games look the same and most games look slightly better than last gen. PS4 may be a bunch more powerful but it doesnt show. The gap was pretty big(maybe bigger) in the PS2/GC/XBOX era, and games didnt look much better on XBOX(God Of War was one of the best looking games that gen). Devs hiding behind CGI/rendered/BS cutscene trailers doesnt help either.



Getting an XBOX One for me is like being in a bad relationship but staying together because we have kids. XBone we have 20000+ achievement points, 2+ years of XBL Gold and 20000+ MS points. I think its best we stay together if only for the MS points.

Nintendo Treehouse is what happens when a publisher is confident and proud of its games and doesn't need to show CGI lies for five minutes.

-Jim Sterling

BHR-3 on 08 August 2014

i was an exclusives ps3 gamer when it came to multis last gen and i would always read the face off articles and still do as i find the comparisons interesting

while the raw numbers this gen show that the gap is wider than last gen the games really dont you have to remember that last gen we got very few if any good face off articles for games that came out pre 08. these titles that were comparing now for ps4 and xb1 are the 1st gen of multis if you go back and compare the first gen of multis on PS3 vs 360 you will see PS3 had much inferior multis compared to the later released games

also from what weve seen this gen it only appears that Xb1 is lacking in the resolution and fps areas while last gen ps3 suffered in both those areas aswell as AA, anisotropic filtering(something PS4 is still struggling with), and missing effects assets meaning last gen having the game side by side it was much easier to tell which version was inferior



                                                             

                                                                      Play Me

2008ProchargedGT on 08 August 2014
BHR-3 said:
i was an exclusives ps3 gamer when it came to multis last gen and i would always read the face off articles and still do as i find the comparisons interesting

while the raw numbers this gen show that the gap is wider than last gen the games really dont you have to remember that last gen we got very few if any good face off articles for games that came out pre 08. these titles that were comparing now for ps4 and xb1 are the 1st gen of multis if you go back and compare the first gen of multis on PS3 vs 360 you will see PS3 had much inferior multis compared to the later released games

also from what weve seen this gen it only appears that Xb1 is lacking in the resolution and fps areas while last gen ps3 suffered in both those areas aswell as AA, anisotropic filtering(something PS4 is still struggling with), and missing effects assets meaning last gen having the game side by side it was much easier to tell which version was inferior

Watch Dogs?