By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Putin starts sanctions against EU/USA

 

Russia starts sanctions against the West. Is it

Dumb 87 30.42%
 
Funny 61 21.33%
 
Crazy 19 6.64%
 
Mirror move 114 39.86%
 
Total:281
fighter said:

Even the very serious Der Spiegel doesn't dismiss the rumors :

Best joke I've read in a long while. SPIEGEL was once germany's most important and serious new magazine. But that was decades ago, it has become such an uncritical yellow press magazine nowadays that there's the saying that SPIEGEL has become "BILD für Abiturienten"("BILD for high-schoolers"). (BILD is germany's most despised yellow press newspaper).

And that saying already existed before the editor-in-chief of BILD actually really became editor-in-chief of SPIEGEL...

Apart from a few articles now and then from Jakob Augstein, a member of the Augstein family who once founded SPIEGEL, SPIEGEL has become complete rubbish. He openly criticizes the way the magazine has become something like the front line of national anti-russia propaganda.



Around the Network
Nicklesbe said:
fighter said:

what is actually fascinating is that the PR image of putin seems to be built to counter the rumors, even his recent re-wedding has a very suspiscious timing when he has actually always seemed a-sexual to his entourage.

Even the very serious Der Spiegel doesn't dismiss the rumors :

 

"In a new book, a political scientist describes Vladimir Putin as a traumatized orphan with alleged homosexual tendencies and enormous wealth. The Kremlin has dismissed the claims as baseless insinuations."

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/new-book-on-vladimir-putin-claims-russian-president-flees-from-people-a-936801.html


WoW that's not suprising. Hitler was a closest case too. Does he have one nut as well? 

haha

i don't know about that but his jewish and african ancestry has been confirmed by Jean-Paul Mulders, which is even more ironic



ArnoldRimmer said:
fighter said:

Even the very serious Der Spiegel doesn't dismiss the rumors :

Best joke I've read in a long while. SPIEGEL was once germany's most important and serious new magazine. But that was decades ago, it has become such an uncritical yellow press magazine nowadays that there's the saying that SPIEGEL has become "BILD für Abiturienten"("BILD for high-schoolers"). (BILD is germany's most despised yellow press newspaper).

And that saying already existed before the editor-in-chief of BILD actually really became editor-in-chief of SPIEGEL...

Apart from a few articles now and then from Jakob Augstein, a member of the Augstein family who once founded SPIEGEL, SPIEGEL has become complete rubbish. He openly criticizes the way the magazine has become something like the front line of national anti-russia propaganda.

i studied journalism not so long ago and Der Spiegel is still the german reference





fighter said:

i studied journalism not so long ago and Der Spiegel is still the german reference

Then quickly request your money back, you've been fooled.

But seriously: being the "german reference" (I assume that's what called "Leitmedium" in german) might actually still be correct - but that just demonstrates just how irrelevant and bad german journalism has become nowadays.

There's no longer even a single relevant news medium in germany that stands out in any way - Der SPIEGEL definitely once was such a medium for decades, but ever since the Augstein family who founded SPIEGEL got pretty much kicked out and the high profile positions were being assigned to the usual "transatlantics" with strong US/NATO-ties, the magazine has become hardly more than a copy of the other big names in german news media, like ZEIT, FAZ, Süddeutsche and BILD. As I've already pointed out, there's an interesting development in germany during the last months that surprisingly many people have started openly uttering discomfort with or criticizing the press, and one of the most-heard criticisms is that the german press has become extremely "synchronized", one-sided and propaganda-filled. The word "Systemmedien" ("system media") is often used in this context, and Der SPIEGEL might be the most-criticized medium in this development.

But anyway, what exactly are you even trying to suggest by claiming that SPIEGEL is "still the german reference"? I find that argument as meaningless as the WW2 death numbers you posted. Just because an article was published under the label of a once well-respected news medium does not prove it's trustworthy.



Around the Network
ArnoldRimmer said:
fighter said:

i studied journalism not so long ago and Der Spiegel is still the german reference

Then quickly request your money back, you've been fooled.

But seriously: being the "german reference" (I assume that's what called "Leitmedium" in german) might actually still be correct - but that just demonstrates just how irrelevant and bad german journalism has become nowadays.

There's no longer even a single relevant news medium in germany that stands out in any way - Der SPIEGEL definitely once was such a medium for decades, but ever since the Augstein family who founded SPIEGEL got pretty much kicked out and the high profile positions were being assigned to the usual "transatlantics" with strong US/NATO-ties, the magazine has become hardly more than a copy of the other big names in german news media, like ZEIT, FAZ, Süddeutsche and BILD. As I've already pointed out, there's an interesting development in germany during the last months that surprisingly many people have started openly uttering discomfort with or criticizing the press, and one of the most-heard criticisms is that the german press has become extremely "synchronized", one-sided and propaganda-filled. The word "Systemmedien" ("system media") is often used in this context, and Der SPIEGEL might be the most-criticized medium in this development.

But anyway, what exactly are you even trying to suggest by claiming that SPIEGEL is "still the german reference"? I find that argument as meaningless as the WW2 death numbers you posted. Just because an article was published under the label of a once well-respected news medium does not prove it's trustworthy.

being a reference in journalism means that you actually investigate, it's all the difference between "journalists" that relay information by copy/pasting and journalists that verify their sources

in this case it means that Der Spiegel considered the book, read it, analyzed the methodology and flaws, and didn't dismiss its core thesis

my university was among the top 50 worldwide at the time according to the infamous Shangai's standards, so it was money well spent

i prefer not to enter the rest of your argument until you elaborate it some more, i find quite sad when people say "that is not true, the source is crap, the point is moot" and yet fail to provide anything else than superficial opinions

 



I don't get this by Putin won't this actually make things worse for Russia?



Wyrdness said:
I don't get this by Putin won't this actually make things worse for Russia?

No. It will hit EU mostly, USA/Australia/Canada a bit. Won't make big problems for Russia.



fighter said:
ArnoldRimmer said:
fighter said:

i studied journalism not so long ago and Der Spiegel is still the german reference

Then quickly request your money back, you've been fooled.

But seriously: being the "german reference" (I assume that's what called "Leitmedium" in german) might actually still be correct - but that just demonstrates just how irrelevant and bad german journalism has become nowadays.

There's no longer even a single relevant news medium in germany that stands out in any way - Der SPIEGEL definitely once was such a medium for decades, but ever since the Augstein family who founded SPIEGEL got pretty much kicked out and the high profile positions were being assigned to the usual "transatlantics" with strong US/NATO-ties, the magazine has become hardly more than a copy of the other big names in german news media, like ZEIT, FAZ, Süddeutsche and BILD. As I've already pointed out, there's an interesting development in germany during the last months that surprisingly many people have started openly uttering discomfort with or criticizing the press, and one of the most-heard criticisms is that the german press has become extremely "synchronized", one-sided and propaganda-filled. The word "Systemmedien" ("system media") is often used in this context, and Der SPIEGEL might be the most-criticized medium in this development.

But anyway, what exactly are you even trying to suggest by claiming that SPIEGEL is "still the german reference"? I find that argument as meaningless as the WW2 death numbers you posted. Just because an article was published under the label of a once well-respected news medium does not prove it's trustworthy.

being a reference in journalism means that you actually investigate, it's all the difference between "journalists" that relay information by copy/pasting and journalists that verify their sources

in this case it means that Der Spiegel considered the book, read it, analyzed the methodology and flaws, and didn't dismiss its core thesis

my university was among the top 50 worldwide at the time according to the infamous Shangai's standards, so it was money well spent

i prefer not to enter the rest of your argument until you elaborate it some more, i find quite sad when people say "that is not true, the source is crap, the point is moot" and yet fail to provide anything else than superficial opinions

 

Not to mention obvious propaganda ontop of superficial opinions.



http://www.youtube.com/v/AoOOpLpcF28 http://www.youtube.com/v/CphFZGH5030

All Hail the Jester King. The King is back, and I am still a dirty girl prof ;)

Nicklesbe said:
fighter said:
ArnoldRimmer said:

Then quickly request your money back, you've been fooled.

But seriously: being the "german reference" (I assume that's what called "Leitmedium" in german) might actually still be correct - but that just demonstrates just how irrelevant and bad german journalism has become nowadays.

There's no longer even a single relevant news medium in germany that stands out in any way - Der SPIEGEL definitely once was such a medium for decades, but ever since the Augstein family who founded SPIEGEL got pretty much kicked out and the high profile positions were being assigned to the usual "transatlantics" with strong US/NATO-ties, the magazine has become hardly more than a copy of the other big names in german news media, like ZEIT, FAZ, Süddeutsche and BILD. As I've already pointed out, there's an interesting development in germany during the last months that surprisingly many people have started openly uttering discomfort with or criticizing the press, and one of the most-heard criticisms is that the german press has become extremely "synchronized", one-sided and propaganda-filled. The word "Systemmedien" ("system media") is often used in this context, and Der SPIEGEL might be the most-criticized medium in this development.

But anyway, what exactly are you even trying to suggest by claiming that SPIEGEL is "still the german reference"? I find that argument as meaningless as the WW2 death numbers you posted. Just because an article was published under the label of a once well-respected news medium does not prove it's trustworthy.

being a reference in journalism means that you actually investigate, it's all the difference between "journalists" that relay information by copy/pasting and journalists that verify their sources

in this case it means that Der Spiegel considered the book, read it, analyzed the methodology and flaws, and didn't dismiss its core thesis

my university was among the top 50 worldwide at the time according to the infamous Shangai's standards, so it was money well spent

i prefer not to enter the rest of your argument until you elaborate it some more, i find quite sad when people say "that is not true, the source is crap, the point is moot" and yet fail to provide anything else than superficial opinions

 

Not to mention obvious propaganda ontop of superficial opinions.

I know... Very typical of people who "think" in emotional terms.