Quantcast
Fire Emblem Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Fire Emblem Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

Cont. - the other day.



"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"

Around the Network
noname2200 said:
theprof00 said:

Shall I spare you and repeat myself then?

You asked why I thought negatively about outlaw. I answered by asking outlaw if he's gotten around to looking into sparks. I thought poorly of him because he said he would do something and didn't follow through. I was suspicious of fake-activity. He comes back to say he knows sparks previous alt. That's confirmation of fake-activity. Instead of simply telling you, I gave you the opporunity to look at what I was looking at. I'm guessing you didn't bother...just like you didn't bother to read my posts that also explained this already.

Second question was about confirmation but non-confirmation of day talk.

I'm assuming this was in reference to Ike. I'm not sure what was so hard to figure out. A person who claimed to be following along doesn't correct me on known information....twice even.

So regarding outlaw it's egocentrism and impatience, and regarding day talk it may be because you're unable to keep track of who said what when, or because I missed the part when the mafia's ability or inability to talk during the day became "known information." Either way, got it, glad we're on the same page now. Albeit probably just for now. Please, carry on.

What do you want from me? You want me to carry on, or shut up, because you're clearly not interested in anything I, or others, have to say.



padib said:

@2. That's exactly what I'm trying to do with noname.

@bold. That might make the game more fun and you'll be able to notice more things without making users get scared about it, then bring it up when it matters most. Like bam! You have a complete case with a list of OBJECTIONS! :P

Ok sure but for the sake of my own neck, let's try talking to the suspicious lurkers about something other than how I'm harmful to town.

For the record, I have no problem sitting back while other people talk and I listen. The only problem is that nobody ever seems dedicated enough to actually get people talking. Although sparks and spurge seem interested in creating discussion.



theprof00 said:

What do you want from me? You want me to carry on, or shut up, because you're clearly not interested in anything I, or others, have to say.


I expressly stated what I want from you, albeit to padib instead of you to: keep going. It's been helpful. I like the results you've achieved so far. None of the above is sarcasm. But understand that your tactics will lose people very often, that your style of play sometimes revolves around paying more attention to small details than other players do, and that what you see as significant or noteworthy will not always be so universally regarded, so occasionally you may have to stop and explain your reasoning to others. Or at least accept that not everyone is going to follow you.

That's all.



noname2200 said:
theprof00 said:

What do you want from me? You want me to carry on, or shut up, because you're clearly not interested in anything I, or others, have to say.


I expressly stated what I want from you, albeit to padib instead of you to: keep going. It's been helpful. I like the results you've achieved so far. None of the above is sarcasm. But understand that your tactics will lose people very often, that your style of play sometimes revolves around paying more attention to small details than other players do, and that what you see as significant or noteworthy will not always be so universally regarded, so occasionally you may have to stop and explain your reasoning to others. Or at least accept that not everyone is going to follow you.

That's all.

Ok well thank you. I totally understand that my evidence is not always so important to others, and I don't fault anyone for that but myself.

As such, I'm taking padib's advice and sitting back for a bit while my destruction to town heals and mafia get comfortable to talk about nonsense again and slip.

If there's any info town wants to look for, I've written plenty of posts. My post about Hylian might be one to bookmark.



Around the Network

Tagging.




Nintendo still doomed?
Feel free to add me on 3DS or Switch! (PM me if you do ^-^)
Nintendo ID: Mako91                  3DS code: 4167-4543-6089

supermario128 said:
Tagging.

Do you have permission from WoW?



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

spurgeonryan said:
@Padib

I think Sparks play is just like how a veteran mafia player would play. He brings up links, posts, etc. Does that mean he is town? Does that mean theprof is town just because he is posting a lot and debating wonderfully? It means nothing. Just like it means nothing for people to keep bringing up roles and the actual real game. WoW said it has nothing to do with it. Yet, even after I mentioned this again, some keep doing it. Like it is part of their role to keep mentioning the game.


Smeags has been active. Very nice....has he really said anything other than having fun? But then again, it seems he does that in all his games. Act all jovial and make cute posts. Seems to be his defense mechanism to not let people on to what he is all about. So is his not really making any meaningful posts him trying to just be "active" or him just being him and being mysterious?

Or how about myself? Am I not posting because I have nothing to say? Or that I am trying to stay invisible? Or do I just not know what I am doing like ConeyG said, yet that is all about all he has said since we have started other than talking about game characters. It does not matter, since I have never known what I was doing in the past and that certainly did not stop me from doing and saying whatever.

Or what about Padib. The man who once post 2,000 posts in one day in mafia, yet turned out to be town and destroying the game when he forced Hatmoza to act crazy and destroy it even more. So now that you are not posting 2,000 times does that mean you are scum?

What do you think?

Now for the obvious incoming questions.......

@bold. Do you think that because Cone is doing that, he's posting but not actually contributing? I feel like that's what you meant by the 3rd paragraph.

About Smeags, what do you think that it is? In mafia, I found smeags to get into his characters in all his games, those where he was mafia and those where he was town. Do you think it is WIFOM? In other words, do you think that it can really be true either way? Ergo that he can embody his role whether he is mafia or not, and so we can't deduce from it?

About yourself, I think you're not posting because you're not sure what to say. I think you realize that on day 1, as town, there isn't much you can do to prevent a mislynch and there is not much you can do to investigate without getting lost in rabbit trails. I think that's why you're playing it more cool this game, I think since the long mafia break you've kind of gotten over trying too hard. Am I on the right trail?

About padib, do you think my playing differently hints at me being scum in this game, whereas when I was town I played more like a frantic paranoid? Do you think frantic paranoid happyD is town and not frantic paranoid happyD is scum? What about my other games? Do you remember the one in which I played with Linkz and barely posted and people were saying it was scummy (though I was again town)? Or what about that game where you and I both played scum and I played innocent townie and we both lost tragically?

But most importantly, what do you think about the more active users that were under scrutiny (Nicklesbe, Sparks). I realize you feel that sparks is posting links, but how do you feel about his case on inactive players, do you think that it's an easy case for him to make, especially on day 1? How do you feel about Wright bringing in some baiting techniques to see how Coney will react? Did you think that was slick or did you think it was fishy?

What do you feel about noname allowing prof to do the work? Do you think he should do some investigating himself?



Smeags, I have to admit I feel a bit uneasy with your contributions day 1. I feel like you're tiptoeing this game.

Posts on flavor, statistical posts, answering questions about past games. But something is irking me the wrong way about your play this game, I get a scum vibe from you.



padib said:
Smeags, I have to admit I feel a bit uneasy with your contributions day 1. I feel like you're tiptoeing this game.

Posts on flavor, statistical posts, answering questions about past games. But something is irking me the wrong way about your play this game, I get a scum vibe from you.

How so? Evidence, hunches, feelings?

You've posted what I've contributed so far, but what about it feels like scum to you?