DonFerrari said:
|
Yes it brings up lots of dicussion. And usually the threads with flamebait articles posted get locked.
Should we get rid of N4G articles in the bottom of Homepage? | |||
Yes | 18 | 72.00% | |
No | 4 | 16.00% | |
What would we have instead? | 2 | 8.00% | |
Total: | 24 |
DonFerrari said:
|
Yes it brings up lots of dicussion. And usually the threads with flamebait articles posted get locked.
MoHasanie said:
Yes it brings up lots of dicussion. And usually the threads with flamebait articles posted get locked. |
Well it always depends on if the flamebait is in the article, the OP or the people discussing... if a flamebait article is posted but everyone discuss it in civil manner them they keep the thread going.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Yeah we should, after all that's why people like me exist. Posting articles from N4G is my life.
"I've Underestimated the Horse Power from Mario Kart 8, I'll Never Doubt the WiiU's Engine Again"
When I was a writer, I hated posting the content from my network to N4G. It just felt wrong. I love the concept, hate the execution. As it currently stands, it just feeds fanboyism and denigrates whatever consoles or group of fans is least vocal or has the weakest presence.
The content is usually vapid and the headlines are geared toward sensationalism. This mentality unfortunately follows wherever the content is replicated.
I'd prefer we link back to something more reputable like Gamesindustry.biz.
The rEVOLution is not being televised
There would still be countless threads linking to the articles whether they are posted on the main page or not. There are a couple of users here that seem to really enjoy reading those n4g articles...
Viper1 said: When I was a writer, I hated posting the content from my network to N4G. It just felt wrong. I love the concept, hate the execution. As it currently stands, it just feeds fanboyism and denigrates whatever consoles or group of fans is least vocal or has the weakest presence. The content is usually vapid and the headlines are geared toward sensationalism. This mentality unfortunately follows wherever the content is replicated. I'd prefer we link back to something more reputable like Gamesindustry.biz. |
I feel your pain... the concept of a gaming news portal is great, the way they handle their comments, and the type of article that get destack is bad tough.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Anfebious said: Yeah we should, after all that's why people like me exist. Posting articles from N4G is my life. |
And we all know VGC exists to please your needs. Please lock the thread as I don't want Anfebious to die.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Anfebious said: Yeah we should, after all that's why people like me exist. Posting articles from N4G is my life. |
Your life doesn't seem to be all that great..
---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---