By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Sony: EA Access Doesn't "Represent Good Value To The PlayStation Gamer"

TheBlackNaruto said:
Goatseye said:
TheBlackNaruto said:
 

Well if they are giving EVERY game they release every year to the subscription the following year then wouldn't that hurt EA money wise? For instance why buy the next Fifa, the next BF or Madden when they come out if all I have to do is wait til the following year and get all of them for $30? So EA would essentially be getting $30 as opposed to say $180(not including taxes of course). And of course this will hurt used game sells there is no denying that. 

From the games currently available they are not "old" games they are games that are only about a year old. Fifa 14, Madden 25, BF4 heck those are the latest games in their respective series. Heck some of them are not even a year old yet Madden 25 and Fifa 14 for example. So yeah I can see them losing more money than they would gain. Great value for consumers without a doubt though. Because I can save over $150 a year to play these games now. 

Sports games devalue super fast and after a year barely anybody buys them. I'm pretty sure EA will introduce them in the program 4-5, 5-6 months after release as they sell a lot.

That makes sense but still wouldn't that be shooting themselves in the foot kind of? I mean again why buy the game if I only have to wait 6 months or so to almost get it for free(even though $30 a year is not "free" but a STEAL would be an understatement). Again GREAT value for consumers and it will save us tons of money!  

But they'd be dealing with lower distribution costs right? No retailer, no physical discs, no unsold stock therefore no returns.

Pretty sure they're making their margins there. Especially when they can afford to give you 10% discount on the new digital releases on top of everything else.



Around the Network
Fifaguy360 said:
TheBlackNaruto said:

That makes sense but still wouldn't that be shooting themselves in the foot kind of? I mean again why buy the game if I only have to wait 6 months or so to almost get it for free(even though $30 a year is not "free" but a STEAL would be an understatement). Again GREAT value for consumers and it will save us tons of money!  

But they'd be dealing with lower distribution costs right? No retailer, no physical discs, no unsold stock therefore no returns.

Pretty sure they're making their margins there. Especially when they can afford to give you 10% discount on the new digital releases on top of everything else.

You are right I didn't think about that. Well in the end I hope everything balances out. 



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23

There's not enough EA games that I care about for me to make EA Access worth it to me



Xbox One, PS4 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)

'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin

Prediction: Switch will sell better than Wii U Lifetime Sales by Jan 1st 2018

I like how sony tried to spin it like they were doing this for the sake of the customers and not because it conflicts with their own subscription service. Sony has some really great PR people.



wilco said:

I like how sony tried to spin it like they were doing this for the sake of the customers and not because it conflicts with their own subscription service. Sony has some really great PR people.

And unfortunately some people beleive and defend them. They have great PR people but they have even better fans who believe everything Sony tells them...



    

NNID: FrequentFlyer54

Around the Network
MoHasanie said:

And unfortunately some people beleive and defend them. They have great PR people but they have even better fans who believe everything Sony tells them...

no different from MS and their fans or Nintendo and their fans..



Man.. I hate it when your girl has to leave my place to come back to you..

BillyBong said:
MoHasanie said:

And unfortunately some people beleive and defend them. They have great PR people but they have even better fans who believe everything Sony tells them...

no different from MS and their fans or Nintendo and their fans..

True. But I feel like I see more Sony fans do it. Its probably cause there are so many of them on internet gaming forums and sites or at least that's what I've observed. 



    

NNID: FrequentFlyer54

Why is everyone avoiding the obvious important question?
Why no Origin or 360? Either EA didn't offer it to Sony or Sony didn't pay for it.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

ClassicGamingWizzz said:
walsufnir said:
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
walsufnir said:

No you're just late. Yesterday it was good news, even Sony fans said it was good and wanted that offering, too.

But then Sony told the community it wasn't a good deal and thus the followers took this opinion and now it's bad.

Welcome to the internet in 2014.

can you give examples, i would love to know who said it was good yesterday aand are saying its garbage now, show us please those comments.

 I didn't say it was the same people.

then why the hell are you complaining about sony fans, did you expect ALL sony fans to think this was a good deal ?


I didn't complain about Sony fans, I complained about followers.



Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
Why is everyone avoiding the obvious important question?
Why no Origin or 360? Either EA didn't offer it to Sony or Sony didn't pay for it.

 

You seem to be suggesting that Microsoft paid EA but if they did pay EA then why would they not put it on 360? MS has also never had much of a problem with allowing supposedly exclusive content to go to PC as well. Your examples prove nothing. Xbox One is probably just the beta platform. This service will likely go to as many platforms as possible.