By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - A New Content Model for Nintendo

While thinking about Nintendo's new approach that they've said they will be taking, i.e. the unified OS and architecture, I've been thinking of a new way in which Nintendo could approach their games each generation. The next Nintendo consoles should be the place to get Nintendo content.That seems obvious, but what I mean is that it could be more of a service in a sense. Take Mario kart as an example. You get one of those per nintendo console. What if they supported that title troughout the generation? What I'm proposing is that Nintendo would look at each of their major console titles like zelda, 3d mario, metroid, pikmin (I know it's not really major, but they could do a lot woth the franchise) as a service of sorts. That is, you buy zelda and throughout a course of 4 or 5 years you get major updates and expansions to that zelda game. Or Mario kart, instead of Nintendo releasing it and then having to wait another 5 years, you could rely on Nintendo to bring new content to it every few months with new tracks, characters, and modes. This is kind of like the mmo model in a sense. With mmos you pay for an expansion and throughout that expansion's lifetime you get major content updates as well. 

As far as how development might work, here's what I think. Nintendo would have their larger teams work on the main games and then once the main game is completed a smaller team would work on providing updates and new content for it. This would leave the rest of the teams available to work on something else. 

The pricing on this could be based around a service based model or pay individually for the things you want.



Around the Network

I would not like that. I hate episodic games.



That isn't what I'm saying at all.



I rather have the full game first with optional and fair DLC than wait years for more stuff added.....

I would hate Nintendo if that happened. :(



phaedruss said:
That isn't what I'm saying at all.


So you want Nintendo to make smaller games and then have a subscription to get more content? Sounds like a bad deal for gamers...



Around the Network
KLXVER said:
phaedruss said:
That isn't what I'm saying at all.


So you want Nintendo to make smaller games and then have a subscription to get more content? Sounds like a bad deal for gamers...


Where did I say anything about smaller games?



WhiteEaglePL said:
I rather have the full game first with optional and fair DLC than wait years for more stuff added.....

I would hate Nintendo if that happened. :(


Huh? You misunderstood completely what I said. Right now you wait years for new games in some series, what I'm saying would  mean a steady flow of new content for each game.



phaedruss said:
WhiteEaglePL said:
I rather have the full game first with optional and fair DLC than wait years for more stuff added.....

I would hate Nintendo if that happened. :(


Huh? You misunderstood completely what I said. Right now you wait years for new games in some series, what I'm saying would  mean a steady flow of new content for each game.

Oh thats even worse!!! It would take me years to finish one game........ :(

 

The waiting, the suspence, the........I cant take it anymore and its not even  happenomng!!! D:



phaedruss said:

Where did I say anything about smaller games?


Then whats your point? If they make games as big as they do now, then we dont need more content. And how would it free up any time for the developers if the games are just as big as they are now?



KLXVER said:
phaedruss said:

Where did I say anything about smaller games?


Then whats your point? If they make games as big as they do now, then we dont need more content. And how would it free up any time for the developers if the games are just as big as they are now?

You wouldn't like to have new tracks and features added to Mario kart? The games would be as big as they are now, but instead of worrying about making a new game in that franchise, they could dedicate a smaller team to making updates and dlc and the rest of the team would move on. This would also ease up development in some ways since the handheld and console will have the same games.