By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - PlayStation created the Industry, Xbox changed the playing field

OmegaRed421 said:
jlmurph2 said:

Bad thing about Sega's though was that it was future flawed. It was a dial-up service I believe that lasted less than a year.


That was the Dreamcast. However with the Sega Genesis they had a Cable service for games that not many people could actually gain acess to...but was more or less a very early online service.

Don't forget the Saturn, it also has a browser and online play. Sega was extremely ahead of their time. I only harped on the DC online endeavor because SegaNet most closely resembles XBL (pay to play, one unique profile ID, player ratings, central community hub).



Around the Network
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

. Nintendo can't compete directly against Sony and Microsoft any longer because its PS's Market (The homeconsole market anyway).

And all 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th gen back me up.


7th gen Nintendo more than competed they dominated by tapping into the casual market which made M$ and Sony create their own motion peripherials and 8th gen just started so no one knows yet...but I do doubt Nintendo will dominate.



Make it So.

LudicrousSpeed said:

Don't forget the Saturn, it also has a browser and online play. Sega was extremely ahead of their time. I only harped on the DC online endeavor because SegaNet most closely resembles XBL (pay to play, one unique profile ID, player ratings, central community hub).

I didn't realy get to know the Saturn since it was so short lived



Make it So.

OmegaRed421 said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
Nintendo revived the industry
Sega provided competition and stabilized it
Sony broadened it
Microsoft fills Segas role now, down to the online play you give MS credit for. Sega actually had their own pay to play online network long before XBL

^This...ecsept I would say Nintendo broadened the market quite a bit more than Sony with the Wii, the casual market was almost completely untapped until the Wii. They more than revived, they saved the industry and set standard practises that are still followed todaythe help keep it alive even in this saturated gaming world.

 Gaming was growing up with or without Sony...N64 had mature games as well as Sega systems.

My two cents...though don't know if it is worth that (But I did grow up during all of it sept for the time of the Atari, I evn remember playing the 3DO which was really kewl for the time)

 

Yeah I guess I would agree with that considering the 360/PS3 are going to eventually sell close to 100 million each. Just a dramatic increase in the amount of gamers thanks to the Wii. Of course they don't seem to be coming back yet to the WiiU. I agree that Sony doesn't deserve any credit for growing games up either, it had been that way on PC's and of course it was going to come to consoles, all those gamers who grew up on Nintendo and Sega were bound to become adults.

Nintendo has a bizarre 3rd party relationship that prevents them from really competing with MicroSony now. Its like their platforms are a place to just play Nintendo games with a small sprinkle of 3rd party thrown in. Where as strong 3rd party is vital. I don't think this is an element Sony created, it existed before Nintnedo started fucking up.

3DO was awesome. Owned one and loved it.



OmegaRed421 said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

. Nintendo can't compete directly against Sony and Microsoft any longer because its PS's Market (The homeconsole market anyway).

And all 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th gen back me up.


7th gen Nintendo more than competed they dominated by tapping into the casual market which made M$ and Sony create their own motion peripherials and 8th gen just started so no one knows yet...but I do doubt Nintendo will dominate.

7th gen is the crux of my argument. Stacking up against the PS360, it should have been a flop, I mean it was very low risk compared to its competitors and released last. But when Nintendo realized that new people started picking it up, they jumped on it. The GC was market toward children while the Wii was marketed towards the entire family. And that paid off, big time.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

Around the Network
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
JWeinCom said:
 



Then create your own thread.


Or... maybe if you make an argument title it and develop it properly, and don't discount any criticism by saying "then create your own thread"?  I mean, I'm sorry, I thought you put out thoughts that you were ready and able to defend.  If that wasn't the case I apologize for challenging half baked ideas.



"Playstation created the industry"

False, clickbait title worthy of N4G.



Actually, Playstation exists thanks to Nintendo's cockyness but then again Nintendo always rocked this industry because Atari created E.T.



LudicrousSpeed said:

Nintendo has a bizarre 3rd party relationship that prevents them from really competing with MicroSony now. Its like their platforms are a place to just play Nintendo games with a small sprinkle of 3rd party thrown in. Where as strong 3rd party is vital. I don't think this is an element Sony created, it existed before Nintnedo started fucking up.

Its because Nintendo is a Game Developer as well. 3rd party existed before Sony, but since Nintendo dominate the market, it controlled the 3rd parties, and it would organize them in away to benefit it. When Sony came in, it provided an alternative that Sega didn't have since unlike Nintendo or Sega it wasn't a game developer.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

So the truth of the matter is...Atari created the market for the masses...Nintendo had to save it....Sega was too ahead of their time...Sony was bitter and gave 3rd parties a way from under Nintendo's thumb....M$ threw money at it and online for all systems was determined by their practices.



Make it So.