Really? i mean really? Seriously Battlefield 4 does not look anything close to the order 1886. One of the pictures you chose was an artist rendering not in-game it was just a guy who drew it on his computer from the studio. The other one was a picture that just didnt show any of the details off other than the lighting that is so much better than anything in battlefield already.

already 150 bucks more than 400

Not even half as good as the ps4.

Significantly less ram and ram speed

The gpu you would need for a pc to match the ps4 would need to be twice as good. 

@Deepo Consoles run 2x or so better than equal PC hardware, but it isn’t just API in the way, focus a single spec also matters.

— John Carmack (@ID_AA_Carmack) March 22, 2011

And those keyboard and mouse dont come with any motion controls touchpad and or a lightbar for z axis measurement.

Thats a negatory.

But can't go wrong with Battlefield 4 on Ultra with AA, and free internet ;)

EDIT: did you just post a twitter of John Carmack as if it was solid proof?

@Bolded Really? That makes it even worse then. Because I tried to pick one of the more impressive of the "screenshots" released. 

Anyway, why don't your provide some screenshots and a comparison  to substantiate the following claim, "Battlefield 4 does not look anything close to the order 1886." And I am talking about the whole package btw, not just the characters in some cinematic scene. 

Honestly, I think both Witcher 3 and Bloodborne look much better than Order 1886, and Battlefield 4 does come pretty close. 

good graphics if you still live with your parents, sure

You don't need PS Plus on PC, and Steam often gets you the cheapest version of multiplatform games available; so on the long run, paying 50 dollars more than the original price of an Xbox One is enough to achieve graphical parity, and a long lasting system too.

I'm not disminishing PS4 value. All I'm saying is that those arguments of "you gotta pay $1000!" are not really true. On the long run, you'll save more money playing on PC than on PS4, as well. But that also depends on the gamer and his preferences.

Why don't we add the cost of PS network, and an average of $20/game to the budget of the PS gamer vs. a PC gamer. Add another $200 to your PS4 estimate for  four four years of internet alone. Anyway, by the time Order 1886 or Uncharted 4 release, PC gaming will have gone through likely two more graphics card generations and ram would be vastly cheaper. So while you're playing those games that are suppose to push the PS4's hardware, a person can buy a PC for the same price that exceeds the PS4 in ability, and enjoy multiplatform games with a graphical quality, image quality, and framerates matching or exceeding that of the PS4. 

This thread is ours now :D

Corrected

Quotee Tree Shortened and User Moderated - Conegamer

There is a difference between a PC Elitist, PC Enthusiast, and PC Gamer.