When it comes to medicine that saves a life then insurance should cover but this issues has to do with having to pay with other peoples choice that you don't agree. Some of you people are taking this in the wrong direction which is part of the problem

Not if someone else is paying for them no they don't. An employer not paying for something doesn't prevent an employee from accessing that thing. ANd you are right it doesn't cover just Christians. And as crazy as you think it sounds I do believe that a Jewish organization (which they no longer reject insulin as a religion and neither do Muslims due to it being a medical necessity, also there are now alternatives to porcine insulin so it should be a non issue anyways.) should be able to choose what the insurance that they provide to their employees covers.

I am also consistent with allowing non religious employers to not supply certain medical practices based on their own objections as long as they are paying for it. And BTW its not just Christian employers who object to providing abortifacient drugs. And even if i was so what? Why should they be forced to supply it? Are they not covered under the First Amendment? An employer can't force you to not take plan B, they just can't be forced to pay for it.

This is why people need to stop asking other people to provide for them. Health care should be between a person and their medical provider. Medical insurance is anything but these days. There are ways of getting these health coverage plans through like minded individuals who share the same values as you or I do besides relying on the government or an employer. The answer is to open up the coverage markets by dropping the ban on getting insurance from out of state, allow for more options by not dictating what each plan must cover, allow for people to get just catastrophic insurance (which would be very cheap) and encourage health savings plans that aren't use or lose.  Then you could get a plan that covered all the abortion pills you like. Whoch you would pay for with thearnings you made by working for one of these evil, greedy corporations.

Again, the ruling does no such thing. It reaffirms, narrowly I might add, that people have a right to practice their religion freely and that government cannot force them to provide drugs that cause abortions (seriously look at the case, Hobby Lobby was challenging abortifacient drugs) with the medical insurance plans they offer to their employees. Just because you become a business owner or a corporate executive doesn't mean you lose your religious freedom.

You are confusing corporations with people. A corporation is an entity made of hundreds, if not thousands of people, all with different beliefs. One man's belief chould not be able to affect the private lives of everyone elses' beliefs, no matter how high up they are. 

And your idea of "choice" in employment is laughable. Skilled workers needs skilled jobs. If there is only one major chemical plant in a town, can the chemists that live there choose to work somewhere else? 

I could be wrong but i believe the supreme court ruled a few years back, that a corporation essentially is a person (since its made up of you know people) so they have all the same rights that a person should have. Why would a corporation, composed of people, suddenly not have the same rights as all those people with in the corporation?