By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Xbox One vs. PS4: What Microsoft’s console does better than Sony’s

GribbleGrunger said:
DerNebel said:
GribbleGrunger said:
Frequent firmware updates are NOW a positive? What a change from last gen.

I was about to say this, last gen people were constantly bitching about the frequency of PS3 updates and now it's seen as something positive...

I actually highlights a trend that's running through the media (particularly American) at the moment. Everything that was a negative last gen has now become either irrelevent or a possitive for an American company.

100% right.  I remember people on here mocking that the PS3 got regular updates.  I'm pretty sure some sites bitched about it, too.  Just like how slight advantages in resolution, framerate, textures, and/or lighting was seen as a HUGE advantage for the 360.  Now, that the PS4 has those in spades, we get tons of articles/posts stating, "Nope, those aren't important and if you think they are, you are a fanboy, now."



Around the Network

Oh, and they forgot one. If you missed downloading GWG's Max: Curse of the Brotherhood in June, you can download it in July, too. Hey, they said two One games free a month, not that they would be different ones from the previous month.



JudasKiss said:
The Xbone has better games at the present too. It looks like it will be that way for at least another year.

Personal opinon there.  If we go by the numbers, ~3.5M more people believe PS4 has the better games.



Leadified said:
Isn't it slightly misleading to say that the XBO costs the same as the PS4 and then use Kinect as an example, especially since the Share button is "free"?

I think the updates on the XBO are great though, especially since MS wants the community to get involved.


Yes it is, but contradictory arguments are used in these articles all the time. Based on my experience, all of these are untrue or nonissues. Based on my time with my PS4, and my friend's xbox one. The ps4 does almost everything more reliably, except for the snap feature, which is useless if you have a smartphone, tablet, or PC. 



Television

PlayStation 4 just doesn’t even have this kind of stuff as an option because it doesn’t have an HDMI in. It does have some limited ability to control certain television through a special kind of HDMI connection, but that’s not even close to the same thing.

Except it sort of does, i can use device link over hdmi to have it shut down the tv/av when the console shuts down.

Kinect, voice commands, and app switching

Talking to the Xbox is also the fastest way to get from one app to another. “Xbox, go to Twitch” will immediately launch the video program no matter where I am in the system. Even better, “Xbox, start broadcasting” will engage my livestream.

PS4 has the Share button, which includes some of these features, and it doesn’t have a slow interface for switching between games and apps, but it feels a bit sluggish compared to the instant response of Xbox One’s Kinect.

Is that a testiment to the feature or a testiment to the poor UI design?

You can take screenshots and start/stop broadcasting/recording via voice commands on PS4 too.

Twitch integration

The PlayStation 4 gives players the option to livestream their gameplay action to Twitch or to Ustream. Xbox One gamers don’t have that choice, but they instead get a Twitch app with slightly better integration. The Xbox One can “snap” apps while you’re gaming. This means that players can snap the Twitch chat to the side of the screen while still playing on the other. Xbox One players can see the chat while still streaming in full screen.

The streaming update to the PS4 added the same features, just saying, also if you snap an appto the side of the screen then youre not really gaming in fullscreen, are you.

Controller battery life

Sony’s DualShock 4 is an excellent controller. It feels great, it has a touchpad, and it has a built-in audio jack — it also runs out of battery pretty quickly. The Xbox One doesn’t have some of those features, but it also has much better battery life. It also uses AA batteries again, which means you can just always have some rechargeable Duracells ready to go when you do run out of juice.

With the DS4, once it’s dead, you have to get out the long USB cord or just give up for the night and let it charge.

I prefer connecting a cord to the controller over pulling off a battery cover and searching for AA's, if you only have one set of rechargables then the whole points moot anyway, xbox one controller batteries do last longer of course, but really, how is connecting a cable to the controller any more or less of a pain than replacing AA's? it's as if these people werent born in the days of wired controllers.

Frequent updates

Finally, Microsoft’s Xbox One update schedule has seen the console get a number of major upgrades every month. The company even has a program where gamers can volunteer to test out monthly updates before they go out to everyone. Through this process, Microsoft added support for external storage, real names, and Twitch streaming.

Sony is updating the PS4 a ton as well, but it’s patches are less frequent. This makes it feel like if Xbox One is lacking anything — like preloading digital preorders — Microsoft will get to it sooner rather than later thanks to its update schedule.

Why is it some people argue that frequent updates are a bad thing while some argue its a good thing? seems like its good or bad depending on the argument, to me ive had to update both the xbox one and ps4 more or less the same amount of times.

 

Can someone write one of these that's actually unbiased and shows a in depth knowledge of both systems?



Around the Network
Imaginedvl said:
Chevinator123 said:
PS4 controller is superior because it has the earphone jack

Kind of simplistic way to see that. I can say the Xbox One controller is superior them because:

- It gives you the choise to use battery (which last way longer than the DS4 or rechargable kits).
- Ability to stream the whole game audio through your controller), this is a really good feature and a lot of people does not know about it.
- Ability to use USB cable and play as a fully wired controller (signal goes through the wire and no wireless), no lag input
- Rumble triggers

Then the DS4 got the touch panel.

I do not see the DS4 controller as superior in any ways :) (And we are not even talking about personnal preference regarding the controller shape and layout, this would be extremly subjective)

The ds4 gives you a build in battery so you dont have to buy a charge kit that costs extra money.

You can also stream the game audio through the controller (what are you on about)

You can also plug your USB cable in and play wired. 

The ds4 also has the touchpad and it has the lightbar you can use for near perfect z-axis tracking with a playstation camera.



What is good in the article about what PS4 still does better than X1 is that they put the reason of PS4 games having better graphics than X1 is the faster memory and less reserve of gpu power (and that was already taken care off...), but assume that because of a few games parity is being achieved already (and avoid to say PS4 GPU is 50% stronger and have more ROPs, etc).

So to people saying this piece wasn't the work of a fanboy because the site posted on for PS4 needs to see how they tried to make the PS4 advantages lesser and reached for X1 advantages.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

I'll tell you what, though--that Snap feature was a gift from above last night. Yeah, I have a smart phone but being able to watch WWE Money in the Bank on the WWE App and watching the BET Awards at the same time (I HAD to! Everyone on Twitter was talking about it!) was pretty sweet.



DonFerrari said:
What is good in the article about what PS4 still does better than X1 is that they put the reason of PS4 games having better graphics than X1 is the faster memory and less reserve of gpu power (and that was already taken care off...), but assume that because of a few games parity is being achieved already (and avoid to say PS4 GPU is 50% stronger and have more ROPs, etc).

So to people saying this piece wasn't the work of a fanboy because the site posted on for PS4 needs to see how they tried to make the PS4 advantages lesser and reached for X1 advantages.


Sorry, but the only way "parity" is being achieved on a console that is up to 50% less powerful is by gimping the game to the level of the weaker console.  I am not impressed with the "improvements" in the XB1...no amount of cloud BS, DX12, or other special sauce is going to compensate for the fact that it's up to 50% less powerful! 



jnemesh said:
DonFerrari said:
What is good in the article about what PS4 still does better than X1 is that they put the reason of PS4 games having better graphics than X1 is the faster memory and less reserve of gpu power (and that was already taken care off...), but assume that because of a few games parity is being achieved already (and avoid to say PS4 GPU is 50% stronger and have more ROPs, etc).

So to people saying this piece wasn't the work of a fanboy because the site posted on for PS4 needs to see how they tried to make the PS4 advantages lesser and reached for X1 advantages.


Sorry, but the only way "parity" is being achieved on a console that is up to 50% less powerful is by gimping the game to the level of the weaker console.  I am not impressed with the "improvements" in the XB1...no amount of cloud BS, DX12, or other special sauce is going to compensate for the fact that it's up to 50% less powerful! 

I agree with you, but some people think it is possible and that destiny and alike is proof. I just posted it to show that altough the author posted the article for both sides it was possible to see which he favoured and sugar coated.





duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."