Well it just means they didn't bother optimizing PC version. Which will still look good enough and will lessen tensions of PC gamers towards console gamers. Everyone should make their games like this.
Well it just means they didn't bother optimizing PC version. Which will still look good enough and will lessen tensions of PC gamers towards console gamers. Everyone should make their games like this.
bananaking21 said:
|
Yea but it's a Ubisoft game so it will probably look and run worse by then.
@TheVoxelman on twitter
Looks like people are mad for some reason. It's probably going to be lower framerate or something. If the PC version HAS to be better looking than on consoles, just play it on a 4K monitor. Better than consoles confirmed.
If it looks the same as the E3 trailer it already looks great. I don't know if I'll get it, I don't have those powerful consoles or a decent PC.
Yep.
zarx said:
|
so you admit your entire point was based on assumptions an no factual data?
S.T.A.G.E. said:
|
The bulk of their sales yes but they still do very well on PC considering how shitty most of their PC ports and UPlay is on PC. However Assaassin's Creed IV and Watch Dogs (despite not enabling all the effects that were in the E3 2012 build and some pretty shoddy optimisation that caused stuttering that moders could kinda be fixed by modders, they still added TXAA support, better volumetric lighting, slightly better textures, HBAO+, better warter simulation, and offered higher quality shadows and reflections) both still had PC specific enhancements, despite that. Seems odd that one of their franchises that does piticularly well on PC and will likely do better on PC than the others is the one they are aparently going for parity with.
@TheVoxelman on twitter
bananaking21 said:
|
well factual data that the current build isn't smooth. And the last game in the franchise being extramly shitty on consoles (spent most of it's time at 22-26fps) so clearly the Far Cry team (or teams I guess there are probably at least 4) don't really care about the game being smooth on consoles lol. And of course Ubisoft are the kings of unrepresentetive E3 builds. All evidence points to the console versions of FC4 not being super smooth, but hey maybe they will surprise us. And it's always fun to go for a little dig at Ubisoft anyway.
@TheVoxelman on twitter
No surprise, their PC ports have been crappy for years. I'm not willing to spend more than 5 Euros for their efforts.
episteme said: No surprise, their PC ports have been crappy for years. I'm not willing to spend more than 5 Euros for their efforts. |
Far Cry 3 was a crappy port?
Funny, when dev chose to gimp ps4 version for x1 version, peuple are like " the gap si closing !"
But i dont think Pc gamers can blame consoles, because without consoles to support thèse games, They wouldnt exist
Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:
PS4: 17m XB1: 10m WiiU: 10m Vita: 10m
AAA development costs are crippling on ps4 and xbox already. anyone who thinks any developer is going to give PC even more time and effort than the console version is kidding themselves. developers can't afford it and too many PC gamers don't pay for their games anyways.