Quantcast
Is Xenoblade X and Bayonetta 2 the best looking games to ever grace a Nintendo system?

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Is Xenoblade X and Bayonetta 2 the best looking games to ever grace a Nintendo system?

Even better than what Nintendo can and has done themselves?

yes 97 24.87%
 
no 200 51.28%
 
let me explain 36 9.23%
 
see results 56 14.36%
 
Total:389

Mario Kart 8 Looks better then both

X's graphics seem incosistent

Beyonetta doesn't have any wow factor. Its just a good looking game.



Around the Network
Samus Aran said:

Why do some Sony fans come to the Nintendo section just to claim a certain Wii U game looks like a PS2 game? Is it that boring over there in the Sony section?

I think the lack of AAA PS4 games is frustrating them.



Meh. Give me Disaster 2, Monolith Soft. The first one looked great and that was on the Wii. I dare to say Raymond's face was far more detailed than some X characters judging the Threehouse thing.



Wright said:

Meh. Give me Disaster 2, Monolith Soft. The first one looked great and that was on the Wii. I dare to say Raymond's face was far more detailed than some X characters judging the Threehouse thing.


It's not just the graphics. The overall character design looks uninspiring, even compared to the original Xenobalde.



curl-6 said:

Anyone who  thinks X looks like a PS2 game is either just trying to stir up trouble, or doesn't remember what PS2 games look like. 

 

Roma said:
it still amazes me that people still don't know that Xenoblade and X are not Nintendo first party game

Yes, they are. Nintendo owns Monolith Soft.

Wo0psi!! the "not" is not supposed to be there. I know very well that they are first party and that is what amazes me that people do not know until now

I mean check the second sentence which you left out of your quote



    R.I.P Mr Iwata :'(


Around the Network
teigaga said:
Mario Kart 8 Looks better then both

X's graphics seem incosistent

Beyonetta doesn't have any wow factor. Its just a good looking game.


Did you not see her Demon/Angel battle in the city? In the link!



    The NINTENDO PACT 2015[2016  Vgchartz Wii U Achievement League! - Sign up now!                      My T.E.C.H'aracter

Hard to tell, they have different styles and Nintendo seems more intent on their main franchises being more colorful, while games like Bayonetta and Xenoblade Chronicles go for a more realistic fantasy look.

All the games look great what is most important is how they play. 3D Mario World and MK8 seem to have proven that already, can't wait to see how Bayonetta 2 and XCX do.



I still say Pikmin 3 is the best looking game on the Wii U in my book



"I think it will be the HDS"-Me in regards to Nintendo's next handheld.

X maybe (though it's very inconsistent), but not B2. I really don't get the fuss around its visuals... It has a great sense of scale, and of course runs at 60fps, but outside of that i find it incredibly underwhelming :/ I thought the same thing when the original came out.

Overall i'd probably put Zelda U above both. Based on what we've seen it's easily the most technical impressive game on the WiiU (for what that's worth), and also has Nintendo's art direction behind it. Not much to complain about there.



If we're talking about "wow factor" here, then none of these games impress anyone who has gamed on PC/PS360 over the last generation.

The last games on a Nintendo console to truly blow gamers away visually were the likes of Rogue Squadron II, Melee, Metroid Prime, F-Zero GX and RE4, all on the GC. Mario Galaxy on the Wii was impressive, but did not have that initial wow factor. And nothing on the Wii U save for the Zelda E3 tech demo and initial unveil has come close to being impressive visually.



On 2/24/13, MB1025 said:
You know I was always wondering why no one ever used the dollar sign for $ony, but then I realized they have no money so it would be pointless.