I feel the same.

Assuming everything we've heard is true then yeah, it's without a doubt the most graphically impressive console game we've ever seen. The fact many thought it was CGI just goes to prove that.

I'm exited to see some gameplay that's for sure

It looks totally insane. Hopefully no downgrades.

Agree with Carl, if the Witcher 3 wouldn't launch in February it probably would.

Still, it would be, and even with Witcher around, will be all arguable.

I have doubted ND before this reveal, PS3 engine and all. I'm sorry, never again, they proved right to my eyes, what are they capable off.

when you think PC do you think this ?

Agreed. In terms of direct surroundings UC4 will likely be the better looking (tis' the advantage of linear design), but as an overall package The Witcher 3 has the odds pretty heavily in its favor. Also comes with the standard PC advantage of a much higher possible frame rate and res.

Still, what's most impressive about UC4 is the hardware it's running on. Near CGI like footage running in-engine (and supposedly in real-time) on what is essentially a customized $400 PC? Damn.

It's not an asnwer to his question though.

because he needs me to demonstrate that any PC/PS4 multiplat game can run at 4K+ with 60 fps on PC...

I have been lurking the site lately, but man after reading this I had to answer.   The witcher 3 doesnt hold a candle graphics-wise to how Uncharted 4 will look (based on the in-engine teaser).

and PC too.   PC games graphics are based on raw power; and so, because of that they have ultra high textures, res and AA, but lack that something UC4 has on the trailer.  I dont know what it is, but it just looks better than everything shown on PC.  Better than crysis with 3000 mods, and better than skyrim with the 50000 mods it has.   They offer nice textures and res, but dont offer that CG feel.

PC games dont look like CG