By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Why Assassin’s Creed: Unity’s has no playable women?

To justify the existence of feminist organizations.



Around the Network
bananaking21 said:
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
Cause Ubisoft never gets laid due to their Delays


there name is ubisoft, not being able to get hard is a deal break with the ladies. 

Now, imagine poor Microsoft



"And I mean it's something the team really wanted, but we had to make a decision. It's unfortunate, but it's a reality of game development."


well, honestly that convinced me. they want to make a date, have to actually, they are bringing new things to the table and have priorities. would i prefer they have playable female characters? certainly, but at the end of the day it doesnt effect the gameplay and performance of the game, its actually just a cosmetic feature, which was axed so they can focus on more important stuff.



Burek said:
bananaking21 said:
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
Cause Ubisoft never gets laid due to their Delays


there name is ubisoft, not being able to get hard is a deal break with the ladies. 

Now, imagine poor Microsoft


well bill gates, steve ballmer and don matrick cetainly didnt look like playboys. 



bananaking21 said:
Burek said:
bananaking21 said:
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
Cause Ubisoft never gets laid due to their Delays


there name is ubisoft, not being able to get hard is a deal break with the ladies. 

Now, imagine poor Microsoft


well bill gates, steve ballmer and don matrick cetainly didnt look like playboys. 

Don Mattrick tried leaving the company, but his Zynga has shrunk quite a bit lately.



Around the Network

Not having a playable female in the game isn't wrong, but it's a bit unfortunate given how incredible Aveline was in AC Liberations.

What IS wrong is Ubisoft's ridiculous response. Putting ONE female characters out of four would DOUBLE the work on the entire game? Are they out of their minds? This remark is so off-putting it's ridiculous.



Desktop: AMD Phenom X4 955, ATI Radeon 7950 :: Laptop: Intel i7-3532QM, ATI Radeon 7670m

Consoles: 3DS XL, PS Vita, Zelda 3DS, PS3 Super Slim, DSi, PSP Go, PS3 Fat, Wii, GameCube, PS2

Now Playing: Metroid Prime 2, Dark Souls, Fallout: New Vegas, The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Ages, Persona 4: Golden

theshonen8899 said:
Not having a playable female in the game isn't wrong, but it's a bit unfortunate given how incredible Aveline was in AC Liberations.

What IS wrong is Ubisoft's ridiculous response. Putting ONE female characters out of four would DOUBLE the work on the entire game? Are they out of their minds? This remark is so off-putting it's ridiculous.


read the article, they didnt say double the work. they said double the work on character models, animations and such. which is true. 



Player2 said:
bananaking21 said:
Burek said:
bananaking21 said:
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
Cause Ubisoft never gets laid due to their Delays


there name is ubisoft, not being able to get hard is a deal break with the ladies. 

Now, imagine poor Microsoft


well bill gates, steve ballmer and don matrick cetainly didnt look like playboys. 

Don Mattrick tried leaving the company, but his Zynga has shrunk quite a bit lately.





next assassins creed we'll play a gay black woman in a wheelchair



must-have-list for platforms i don't own yet:

WiiU: Donkey Kong

XBone: Dead Rising 3, Ryse

Oh FFS, not every game needs to have a choice.

We demand to have an option to play as Lars Croft in next TR...