I think it applies to pretty much everyone. Wasn't really aimed at you, though.

I am talking about guns. We need significantly more gun control. Detailed background checks that include family members and friends, more restrictions, a gun registry, etc. etc.

He lived in the peoples republic of Kalifornia.  They have these things you clamor for.  He passed a background check. His guns were registered. He was restricted on the types a guns he could get "no assault weapons" only 10 round mags.

We'll the article seems to imply that there are no true facts when it comes to shootings. And people only use it for political purposes. 

When in reality there are in fact people on the right side of this issue supported by facts. And there are indeed people on the wrong side that only intent is to spread lies and misinformation

He also killed half of his victims with a knife. Who's up for some knife control?

Then why did you not just come right out and say that rather than being vague.

There are many in the media who when saying "How many more must die before we've had enough?" mean more video game restrictions.

I would also disagree with the need for more gun control.

There is a very good chance he never read the article to begin with in the first place.

Why appeal to reason when you can appeal to people's emotion's.

I think the point is that people in today's hyper politicized world have an shitty but all too common tendency to make every awful event fit into their preconceived notion of things, to the point that almost within the hour after the Boston Marathon bombing Michael Moore felt comfortable going on Twitter to imply that the Tea Party had to be behind it while many others were openly hoping that it had been perpetrated by white non-Muslims.

Or, in other words, to hell with facts.

Well did this guy use hunting guns or non hunting guns?

Was the knife a hunting knife? How about his car? 

True, when the cops went to his house after his parents showed him is insane videos, a gun registry wouldn't have helped at all. 

I mean knowing if an angry psycho has guns is completely irrelevant, right? Not to mention he passed the background check. As I said, we need better background checks.

And the fact that I said I was near the shootings, saw people get shot, registered on a video game forum, obviously I was referring to guns and not video games lmao. Come on guys!