By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Santa Barbara Massacre: To Hell With Facts

Guns guns guns. Bazooka... Mah right to protect mah propertarh. If you dont like it. You hate america you commie bastard. People kill people. Guns cant kill a person you freedom hater. People should just have more guns to protect themselves from people with guns who wants to take mah liberty, and rights. Give teachers guns too. Also how are you gonna defend yourselves when the alien invades to probe you and take ur jobs like those damn godless mexican.



Around the Network

The guy appears to have been a complete psychopath, what's there to misunderstand?. I never knew blue balls could be so deadly.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

Luck said:

Im just happy to be part of a community that doesn't value non-hunting guns as an essential household commodity.


What is a "hunting gun" as apposed to a "non hunting" gun.? What's the difference? 



 

Kane1389 said:
If this article was posted on gaf, you'd be ban-hammered to oblivion, I guarantee you.


I agree with it fully, of course


What do you mean I'd be banned. Why?



 

SocialistSlayer said:

What do you mean I'd be banned. Why?

GAF mods tend to swing the ban hammer pretty quickly at anyone who dares express an opinion that's to the right of Che Guevara while everyone else is free to call you every name in the book for having such heretical thoughts.



Around the Network

Dont you just hate it when logic and facts get in the way of your OPINION -_-. *sign* good read op, long but very interesting.




'Video games are bad for you? That's what they said about rock-n-roll.'
-Shigeru Miyamoto

McDonaldsGuy said:
I was there at the massacre and saw someone get shot and (probably) die. I am a UCSB student who just wanted to go on a bike ride, not get shot at. One of my friends was just confirmed dead.

How many more must die before we've had enough?


No one has at any time said that intermitant massacre's are acceptable in any quantity.

Are you implying that people have not had enough massacre?



This is the Game of Thrones

Where you either win

or you DIE

badgenome said:

This complex and tragic event supports my own view.


That's a rather insulting article.  Are you insinuating that I don't know the facts.  Or only choose convenient facts that fit my arguments. 



 

dyremose said:
Guns guns guns. Bazooka... Mah right to protect mah propertarh. If you dont like it. You hate america you commie bastard. People kill people. Guns cant kill a person you freedom hater. People should just have more guns to protect themselves from people with guns who wants to take mah liberty, and rights. Give teachers guns too. Also how are you gonna defend yourselves when the alien invades to probe you and take ur jobs like those damn godless mexican.

Why use arguments when you can use stereotypes.



This is the Game of Thrones

Where you either win

or you DIE

SocialistSlayer said:
Luck said:

Im just happy to be part of a community that doesn't value non-hunting guns as an essential household commodity.


What is a "hunting gun" as apposed to a "non hunting" gun.? What's the difference? 

Im sure they are technical differences, but I won't even go there. It's simply that some guns are owned because they can shoot at animals and other are owned because they can shoot at humans. It could be the same gun in both cases, it's not the point, it's about the intent of the individual.