By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Santa Barbara Massacre: To Hell With Facts

Mericas gun laws need to change.



Nobody's perfect. I aint nobody!!!

Killzone 2. its not a fps. it a FIRST PERSON WAR SIMULATOR!!!! ..The true PLAYSTATION 3 launch date and market dominations is SEP 1st

Around the Network

stlwtng4Dmdrxip said:
Facts? LOL, how about if the killer didn't had guns there woudn't be a massacre.
so the other 4 people he didnt kill with a gun dont count?

 And before you say it, guns manufactures make the guns that criminals carry, they don't appear by magic.
And finally it's the gun manufactures that profit from shootings like this.
how do gun manufacturers make money from this?
But of course i already know you will ignore this, because you're all about the "facts"...








 

SocialistSlayer said:

stlwtng4Dmdrxip said:
Facts? LOL, how about if the killer didn't had guns there woudn't be a massacre.
so the other 4 people he didnt kill with a gun dont count?

 And before you say it, guns manufactures make the guns that criminals carry, they don't appear by magic.
And finally it's the gun manufactures that profit from shootings like this.
how do gun manufacturers make money from this?
But of course i already know you will ignore this, because you're all about the "facts"...






Well, there was that period after Sandy Hook when AR-15's were purchased in record numbers. I realize that was a response to the call for an assault rifle ban not the actual shooting. It is creepy however that a gun most recently know for shooting a bunch of school kids immediately became the hot, must have item for gun enthusiasts.



JPL78 said:
SocialistSlayer said:

stlwtng4Dmdrxip said:
Facts? LOL, how about if the killer didn't had guns there woudn't be a massacre.
so the other 4 people he didnt kill with a gun dont count?

 And before you say it, guns manufactures make the guns that criminals carry, they don't appear by magic.
And finally it's the gun manufactures that profit from shootings like this.
how do gun manufacturers make money from this?
But of course i already know you will ignore this, because you're all about the "facts"...






Well, there was that period after Sandy Hook when AR-15's were purchased in record numbers. I realize that was a response to the call for an assault rifle ban not the actual shooting. It is creepy however that a gun most recently know for shooting a bunch of school kids immediately became the hot, must have item for gun enthusiasts.

it didnt suddenly become so popular,  its always been the most popular rifle in the US.   so its natural that if something is the most popular you will see a huge sales spike on talk that it could be banned.



I am Torgo, I take care of the place while the master is away.

"Hes the clown that makes the dark side fun.. Torgo!"

Ha.. i won my bet, but i wasnt around to gloat because im on a better forum!  See ya guys on Viz

JPL78 said:
SocialistSlayer said:

stlwtng4Dmdrxip said:
Facts? LOL, how about if the killer didn't had guns there woudn't be a massacre.
so the other 4 people he didnt kill with a gun dont count?

 And before you say it, guns manufactures make the guns that criminals carry, they don't appear by magic.
And finally it's the gun manufactures that profit from shootings like this.
how do gun manufacturers make money from this?
But of course i already know you will ignore this, because you're all about the "facts"...






Well, there was that period after Sandy Hook when AR-15's were purchased in record numbers. I realize that was a response to the call for an assault rifle ban not the actual shooting. It is creepy however that a gun most recently know for shooting a bunch of school kids immediately became the hot, must have item for gun enthusiasts.

you mean to tell me the most popular gun in america, that liberal statists have such an irrational fear of that they pee themselves by the mere utterance of its name, had a sales spike after said liberals wanted it banned because... um reasons... its evil.

And this is somehow gun manufacturers faults. It sounds like its the statists in the gun control loby and their acolytes in congress fault.



 

Around the Network

Hypothesis-
Case 1 - Give a psychopath a knife/sharp object and see how many people he could kill before being apprehended.
Case 2 - Now give him a gun (any lethal gun would do) and see how many people he could kill.

Most of the world except USofA are fine without "right to killing with guns". And dear US still cannot afford to change a centuries old law that is probably one of the most obsolete laws in any big democratic constitution.



Dragon246 said:
Hypothesis-
Case 1 - Give a psychopath a knife/sharp object and see how many people he could kill before being apprehended.
Case 2 - Now give him a gun (any lethal gun would do) and see how many people he could kill.

Most of the world except USofA are fine without "right to killing with guns". And dear US still cannot afford to change a centuries old law that is probably one of the most obsolete laws in any big democratic constitution.

wait, are you telling me the rest of the world has a right to kill each other with means other than a gun?



 

SocialistSlayer said:
JPL78 said:

Well, there was that period after Sandy Hook when AR-15's were purchased in record numbers. I realize that was a response to the call for an assault rifle ban not the actual shooting. It is creepy however that a gun most recently know for shooting a bunch of school kids immediately became the hot, must have item for gun enthusiasts.

you mean to tell me the most popular gun in america, that liberal statists have such an irrational fear of that they pee themselves by the mere utterance of its name, had a sales spike after said liberals wanted it banned because... um reasons... its evil.

And this is somehow gun manufacturers faults. It sounds like its the statists in the gun control loby and their acolytes in congress fault.


No, I meant to tell you what I told you. Learn to read. The AR-15 sold more after Sandy Hook. I didn't say it was the manufacturers fault, don't put words into my mouth. You are a rube if you think Bushmaster didn't profit from the whole senario though.



JPL78 said:
SocialistSlayer said:
JPL78 said:

Well, there was that period after Sandy Hook when AR-15's were purchased in record numbers. I realize that was a response to the call for an assault rifle ban not the actual shooting. It is creepy however that a gun most recently know for shooting a bunch of school kids immediately became the hot, must have item for gun enthusiasts.

you mean to tell me the most popular gun in america, that liberal statists have such an irrational fear of that they pee themselves by the mere utterance of its name, had a sales spike after said liberals wanted it banned because... um reasons... its evil.

And this is somehow gun manufacturers faults. It sounds like its the statists in the gun control loby and their acolytes in congress fault.


No, I meant to tell you what I told you. Learn to read. The AR-15 sold more after Sandy Hook. I didn't say it was the manufacturers fault, don't put words into my mouth. You are a rube if you think they Bushmaster didn't profit from the whole senario though.

its a shame too, because bushmaster makes very poor to average ARs.

if only  the media, politicians and the anti-self protection lobby werent so ignorant of firearms, and actually knew "what a" bushmaster actually was. there just were told that term and really didnt know what it meant



 

DD_Bwest said:
JPL78 said:

Well, there was that period after Sandy Hook when AR-15's were purchased in record numbers. I realize that was a response to the call for an assault rifle ban not the actual shooting. It is creepy however that a gun most recently know for shooting a bunch of school kids immediately became the hot, must have item for gun enthusiasts.

it didnt suddenly become so popular,  its always been the most popular rifle in the US.   so its natural that if something is the most popular you will see a huge sales spike on talk that it could be banned.

Sales rose. I went out and bought Too Human when they announced a court order to take it off the shelves. I understand. In case of the AR-15, I still think it is creepy because of the obvious mass shootings associations. I wouldn't personally want to own one. My point was only that Bushmaster did indeed profit from the shooting.

in the aftermath of the purposed ban, which failed, there have been dozens of PRO-GUN laws passed. Gun ownership is actually more of a guarantee than ever before. I really don't see why people like "Rambo" SocialSlayer seem to think his beloved hobby is under attack. It's not based in reality. If liberals want to call for action against guns they have that right. They aren't achieving anything and that upsets some people. I'm glad it does. If no one cared I would be really worried about the state of things.