By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Pachter goes berserk. Insults questioner. "scumbag" "Idiot" "bastard"

The second question in the Pach-Attack video

Its hilarious!!!!!!!


Starts at 1:30!  (no youtube version yet thats why I posted the GT link)


http://www.gametrailers.com/videos/b2ag0z/pach-attack--unreal-4--is-the-price-right-


EDIT (stolen from my later post xD)
Also  somewhat brilliant that the guy thats a bastard scumbag and idiot asked a question which will make this episode probably generate more revenue than any prior Pach-Attack episode because its so controversial. Oh the irony



Around the Network

How far in?



1:30



Btw pachter is right.



I saw this yesterday. It's great haha.



Around the Network

"You don't even want to sit through ads because you're low, bottom-sucking scum"

Damn



                                                                                                               You're Gonna Carry That Weight.

Xbox One - PS4 - Wii U - PC

This is the best thing that has ever come out of his mouth. Hilarious.



Hard to say which of them is the bigger jerk. I don't think using Ad Block is morally akin to piracy, though, because no one ever entered into an agreement to view such ads just by accessing a website and site owners always have the option of blocking Ad Block users if it's that important to them.



think-man said:

Btw pachter is right.


How?  If they make ads that are in the background that are okay everyone would be fine with ads. But if you make ads that actually prevent one from doing what one wanted to do  then how are those ads good? They are an obstacle. And obstacles are what people DONT want thats why they invented cars because walking for hours was an obstacle of  some sorts. etc. Its normal for people to not like obstacles.


Also when its the 10th time that e.g a COD Video is preventing me from watching something Halo related  I will start to HATE COD for that stupid commercial.

If its a cool designed  static AD without sound and without flashing animation etc.  It would be completely cool.
  The web worked like that a long time ago  and one day people were like "hey site if you dont use our annoying ad we wont give you more money you will get the bare minimum" and some dumb sites said "okay lets do it" and it got worse and worse.

If everyone would have agreed to NOT have this shit then every site would get the same amount of money for static "cool" ads than they now get for annoying ones.


Also if ads would be "reasonable" then noone would need to block them and the ad-revenue would automatically increase.  Its the same as annoying shitty  anti-pirate measurements  that result in MORE pirates.



I disagree with him saying Ad-block will be circumvented. It's just an arms race that will never end.



"On my business card I am a corporate president. In my mind I am a game developer. But in my heart I am a gamer." - Satoru Iwata