The article and the gaf thread put it as..

"Why this game isn't on PS4 as well" -> "Because MS is terrific partners".

Not saying they can't or shoudln't acknowledge MS, but they certainly could have done the message in a better way.

Have you see me on the Minecraft saying anything agaisn't MS?

Have you saw me here complaining about MS support for this game?

I think your agenda doesn't fit the OP. Now if you want to address the only person who called them traitors go straight to him.

Have you saw the contract??? GoW was owned by Epic but even so they had in contract that it could only be released on MS platform.

Even if you did not mention anything like that; the point of the OP is talk about the kind of behavior from developers/publishers and it is EXACTLY what I was talking about.

But anyway, I'm sorry, did not realize this thread was here to talk/respond to you and only you :) My understanding of a forums was wrong... So we should use PMs now to have a "public" discussion? 

OP talks only about the way Insominiac answered the question sounding like their old partner (for the last 10 years) is bad, not about they releasing content in a different platform.

It is a open discussion. But if you answer without quoting no one it is easier to think you are answering the OP or a collectivity, and for both cases your point weren't valid. Now if you wanted to address just the 2 people (saw another one after answering you) who called them traitors you could have quoted them. And you tried to attack a specific fanbase, a thing that wasn't even topic here, so I don't see why the passive agressiveness on your answer is needed.

The way they phrased not the fact that they are releasing.

On the article linked they answered to fans of PS platforms that the reason they aren't releasing there and just on X1 is because MS is terrific partners (not saying they aren't).

Bussiness are bussiness, and there are no feeling, but public image still exists and when you can be interpreted as tarnishing it you have a problem.

Sony have kept them fed during their 10 years of exclusives, MS will probably feed tem some in the gen (maybe for the whole of it depending on the sucess of their new games)... EA got the flop. Well someone have the shortend of the stick.

In what way could they have explained the situation without making it seem as if Sony didn't step up to the plate? By not giving Microsoft the credit and recognition they deserve, THAT would be biting the hand that feeds, since Microsoft is actually the hand feeding them right now. What you're proposing is they kind of downplay the role MS had in order to appease a company they used to make exclusive games for.

We don't really know what happened behind the scenes, but from all accounts it seems MS was willing to step up with more money and not take control of the IP. Doesn't Sony know this also? It's not like they'd read these comments and be shocked. They know Insomniac came to them with the idea for the game and that they (Sony) did not give Insomniac a good enough offer.

Seriously people need to stop this shit whenever we post in a sarcastic way and stop being so defensive... There is no attack, just stated facts. Fan bases in general (MS or Sony or even Nintendo) tend to see things with their own light when it is fiting their agenda and in a totaly diffferent way when it is not... There is no attack here and you are just making a huge deal out of nothing instead of understanding the point. Sorry if the way I posted it hurted you in any way but it was not my goal (it was more sarcastic than anything close to aggressive).

My point stays the same. Both companies ARE businesses. Gamers are just customers for them... Developpers/publishers are others businesses and everybody in this little world are trying to make money and survive. Your OP is talking about two businesses like they were almost good friends or family members... And it does not apply (in my oppinion) at all when we are talking about business opportunities...

Also, regarding the public image, nobody will care in 2 years when Insomniac will come out with another exclusive for the PS4... Again, gamers are customers and even if they can be very vocal at a time, they are switching side in a second when something good is coming on the other side...

The way of truth would help a little, as you said MS footed the bill and asked for exclusivity (the terms we don't know), wasn't just because MS is terrific partner... As I said the problem is more on the phrasing than on what happened. And as someone mentioned if we consider they could be butthurt on Sony for not freeing their IPs or against EA for lefting them on the ground because of Fuse flop then it makes sense. But the way they answered the direct question puts the conotation I said in the OP.