By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Eurogamer confirms: Mario Kart 8 is 1080p/60FPS (even in 2-player)

This is very good if it's indeed true!



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

Around the Network
F0X said:
DerNebel said:
F0X said:


Where are the 1080p @ 60fps games?

It's more than likely that the 1080p are a mistake on Eurogamers side.


I would consider it possible, not likely.

I'd consider it pretty likely, cause as I've already posted there are 2 sites that said at the same day that the game is 720p. Also all screenshots for the game are 720p, don't you think that's a bit odd?



DerNebel said:
F0X said:
DerNebel said:
F0X said:


Where are the 1080p @ 60fps games?

It's more than likely that the 1080p are a mistake on Eurogamers side.


I would consider it possible, not likely.

I'd consider it pretty likely, cause as I've already posted there are 2 sites that said at the same day that the game is 720p. Also all screenshots for the game are 720p, don't you think that's a bit odd?


It is, but it also wouldn't be the first time I've seen a game get a resolution buff not long before its release.



3DS Friend Code: 0645 - 5827 - 5788
WayForward Kickstarter is best kickstarter: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1236620800/shantae-half-genie-hero

Zero999 said:
painmaster212 said:
Zero999 said:

Already did but why would I need to? the discussion is graphics, wich only have to be seen. MK8 is much more graphically impressive than any ps360 game and that's not a discussion.

As big as a Mario Kart fan i am, there's no way you have played the best offerings of the PS3 and 360 to make a statement like that.  So your saying that it looks better then games like 

 

The Last of Us

Uncharted 2 or 3

Tomb Raider

Gears of War 3

Alan Wake

Halo 4

Beyond Two Souls

If you think those games look better than MK8, you are forced to say they look better than ps4 titles too or else it's hypocrisy.

I don't own a PS4 or an Xbox One at this time so i couldn't make that statement (I'd probably say they do look better then any PS4 game at this time though even if i did) but this is about you saying Mario Kart 8 looked twice as good as any PS3/360 game and those are a few games i have played on both those consoles that i would consider to look as good or better then MK8. You can't compare games like these to a kart racer that is more meant for fun and gameplay then pretty realistic graphics.

 

Either way sir, you have your opinion and i don't want to take this thread away from the TC's original discussion so i'll end this little chat before it gets out of hand :D Have a good day!



painmaster212 said:

I don't own a PS4 or an Xbox One at this time so i couldn't make that statement (I'd probably say they do look better then any PS4 game at this time though even if i did) but this is about you saying Mario Kart 8 looked twice as good as any PS3/360 game and those are a few games i have played on both those consoles that i would consider to look as good or better then MK8. You can't compare games like these to a kart racer that is more meant for fun and gameplay then pretty realistic graphics.

 

Either way sir, you have your opinion and i don't want to take this thread away from the TC's original discussion so i'll end this little chat before it gets out of hand :D Have a good day!

realistic graphics? this is about GRAPHICS, and MK8 pushes it a lot more than ps360 ever could. if you want to talk about opinion, you can say you prefer those ps3 games but that's it.



Around the Network
painmaster212 said:
Zero999 said:
DerNebel said:
Zero999 said:

Nothing on ps360 is even half as impressive as mario kart 8.

Try playing a PS3/360 game before saying something like this.

Already did but why would I need to? the discussion is graphics, wich only have to be seen. MK8 is much more graphically impressive than any ps360 game and that's not a discussion.

As big as a Mario Kart fan i am, there's no way you have played the best offerings of the PS3 and 360 to make a statement like that.  So your saying that it looks better then games like 

 

The Last of Us

Uncharted 2 or 3

Tomb Raider

Gears of War 3

Alan Wake

Halo 4

Beyond Two Souls

To be fair, none of those are arcade racers and mostly are corridors a la RE4.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Who cares?

I really don't see why ya'll get so much out of 720p vs 1080p. I'd bet you wouldn't notice the difference on nearly all of your TVs.



Mr Khan said:
Kane1389 said:
Mr Khan said:
Kane1389 said:
Mr Khan said:
 

In terms of what, pray tell? Where is the proof that realism is technically more demanding than cartoon graphics, except that realism might demand more complex textures?

...

...

seriously now?

Cartoony games tend to have lower production values not because of their choice of art style, but because of a factor related to the dreaded "Animation Age Ghetto". There's nothing to suggest that such games are categorically inferior, just that they tend to be lower-budget on the balance.


To achive proper realism, you need better AA, more complex geometry and character models, superior lightning and physics, waay more detailed (and thus bigger) textures, more realistic (and thus more demanding) animations, motion capture and much more polygons. There is also stuff like particle effects and clothing animation. Did I really have to explain this?

Except for textures and a certain extent of character models, all of that could be done in a cartoony game. You're talking about effort put into the game period, which, as i said, is a factor that cartoony games tend to be lower-budget on the whole. They do not have to be.

Which was more impressive? Super Mario Galaxy 2 or No More Heroes 2?

Of course it can be done on a cartoony game, but all of them are waay more harder amd demanding on a realistic game than a cartoony game, which was the point of my post and what you asked.

Aso, I heard a statement from some tech industry big shot that somewhere around 5 TFlops are required for a photorealistc game, which again proves that better than realism = more demanding power



Kane1389 said:
walsufnir said:

They are not pushing graphics? First people laughed about WiiU even not capable to do PS360-graphics, now MK8 is shown which is in no way possible on PS360 and then people say they are not pushing graphics at all...

wat

There are 4-5 year old PS3 games that are more impressive than MK8. Realism will almost always beat cartoon


From the looks, not from the technical achievement. Older games looking better to you? Nice, thanks for your opinion. Technically? No.



Kane1389 said:
zero129 said:
Kane1389 said:

wat

There are 4-5 year old PS3 games that are more impressive than MK8. Realism will almost always beat cartoon

Are them games running in 1080P@60fps? hell the is nothing on 360 or ps3 that comes close to what MK8 is doing -_- .


Yes, because it takes a NASA supercomputer to run a graphical beast that is Mario Kart, with its cartooney textures, bad AA and incredibly simple geometry at 1080p/60fps.

GT5 and 6 are technically way more demaning games than Mario Kart (and yes they are both at 1080p/60fps while pushing realism), which is to be expected since one is a cartooney game and one is a racing sim, but there are actually people out there that think MK8 is technically more impressive...


There is a difference between 1280x1080 and 1920x1080 while both is 1080p... Not sure if MK8 is 1920x1080 but your points are off (cartoony textures is nothing bad or less technical demanding).