By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Is cloud the new blast processing of this generation?

 

Is cloud pretty much a marketing term?

Yes...and I ain't falling for it. 83 76.85%
 
No...Cloud POWAH FTW!!! 13 12.04%
 
Yo Mama 12 11.11%
 
Total:108
vivster said:
youarebadatgames said:

Why wouldn't this be possible on a X1? It wouldn't be unique to it, but it it's running on an X86 PC it'll run on an X1.

They did not specify how this particular demo works with the cloud. I highly doubt that they used cloud servers on the internet and rather had them on site. Since they said nothing about how it worked it might as well just been an interactive video stream that was completely running on cloud servers.

We will know when we see actual results on the X1(which we won't).

Another fun thing would be to know how they would accomodate people without or shoddy internet connection. Will the games suddenly become unplayable when there is a little lag? Will the game just crash or will it offload all the work back to the local CPU?


So you're saying they faked the whole thing?  You're free to believe whatever you want, but the demo was realtime, how do you fake that using an interactive video stream?  That kind of world simulation would take any gaming PC to its knees, and I doubt this simulation was done by hooking up a bunch of PCs together and running it locally.

As to gamers with shoddy internet connection, I don't really give a shit about them, they shouldn't play online anyways cause they fucking ruin my game. That's the price of entry if you want to play MMOs, LoL, SC2, CS, or anything else. Besides, world simulation data like that doesn't look as bandwidth intensive as a full video stream, as your GPU is still rendering the objects, just the physics is offloaded to the cloud.



Around the Network
youarebadatgames said:
vivster said:
youarebadatgames said:

Why wouldn't this be possible on a X1? It wouldn't be unique to it, but it it's running on an X86 PC it'll run on an X1.

They did not specify how this particular demo works with the cloud. I highly doubt that they used cloud servers on the internet and rather had them on site. Since they said nothing about how it worked it might as well just been an interactive video stream that was completely running on cloud servers.

We will know when we see actual results on the X1(which we won't).

Another fun thing would be to know how they would accomodate people without or shoddy internet connection. Will the games suddenly become unplayable when there is a little lag? Will the game just crash or will it offload all the work back to the local CPU?


So you're saying they faked the whole thing?  You're free to believe whatever you want, but the demo was realtime, how do you fake that using an interactive video stream?  That kind of world simulation would take any gaming PC to its knees, and I doubt this simulation was done by hooking up a bunch of PCs together and running it locally.

As to gamers with shoddy internet connection, I don't really give a shit about them, they shouldn't play online anyways cause they fucking ruin my game. That's the price of entry if you want to play MMOs, LoL, SC2, CS, or anything else. Besides, world simulation data like that doesn't look as bandwidth intensive as a full video stream, as your GPU is still rendering the objects, just the physics is offloaded to the cloud.

I never said they faked it. As I mentioned MS is always very careful in not telling blatant lies. They just package it very good.

They never said how it worked. "Cloud computing" is a broad term. PSNow is cloud computing(because it's computed in the cloud and then sent via video stream to the receiving device). Every MMO ever does cloud computing(for the generation of loot for example).

They didn't mention how exactly the cloud was used in this case. So it could be anything and as far from the consumer reality away as possible.

If you had the slightest understanding of how the internet works you would see how delay is a huge issue when trying to stream realtime data. Be it video or cloud computed data chunks. It doesn't even matter how good your internet connection is. Sudden delays affect anyone. (just do a ping to 8.8.8.8 for a while and see how delay and jitter effects even you). So what happens when there is a sudden traffic burst in your area and the delays become huge for a second? Will your game break because it doesn't get the necessary data from the cloud fast enough or will the fps absolutely tank to 2fps because the CPU has to take over the work of the cloud processors?

MS has to accomodate for everyone and everything if they plan to use these features.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

vivster said:
youarebadatgames said:

So you're saying they faked the whole thing?  You're free to believe whatever you want, but the demo was realtime, how do you fake that using an interactive video stream?  That kind of world simulation would take any gaming PC to its knees, and I doubt this simulation was done by hooking up a bunch of PCs together and running it locally.

As to gamers with shoddy internet connection, I don't really give a shit about them, they shouldn't play online anyways cause they fucking ruin my game. That's the price of entry if you want to play MMOs, LoL, SC2, CS, or anything else. Besides, world simulation data like that doesn't look as bandwidth intensive as a full video stream, as your GPU is still rendering the objects, just the physics is offloaded to the cloud.

I never said they faked it. As I mentioned MS is always very careful in not telling blatant lies. They just package it very good.

They never said how it worked. "Cloud computing" is a broad term. PSNow is cloud computing(because it's computed in the cloud and then sent via video stream to the receiving device). Every MMO ever does cloud computing(for the generation of loot for example).

They didn't mention how exactly the cloud was used in this case. So it could be anything and as far from the consumer reality away as possible.

If you had the slightest understanding of how the internet works you would see how delay is a huge issue when trying to stream realtime data. Be it video or cloud computed data chunks. It doesn't even matter how good your internet connection is. Sudden delays affect anyone. (just do a ping to 8.8.8.8 for a while and see how delay and jitter effects even you). So what happens when there is a sudden traffic burst in your area and the delays become huge for a second? Will your game break because it doesn't get the necessary data from the cloud fast enough or will the fps absolutely tank to 2fps because the CPU has to take over the work of the cloud processors?

MS has to accomodate for everyone and everything if they plan to use these features.

If you just look at the original Kinect videos - these were *what it could possibly do* and not what it was going to do even though it was sold as such... we have no idea how this concept works, and does it really matter, its all rubbish until you can see a game with it in where it is above and beyond what a PS4 can do.

The cloud for me is just like DX12 things right now, its something for a portion of the gaming market who are upset by the power of their console choice, and use it as a "You just wait" type thing. While it really should be a ... "Hmm interesting concept wonder what gaming might be like in 10-15 years time".



Making an indie game : Dead of Day!

Madword said:

If you just look at the original Kinect videos - these were *what it could possibly do* and not what it was going to do even though it was sold as such... we have no idea how this concept works, and does it really matter, its all rubbish until you can see a game with it in where it is above and beyond what a PS4 can do.

The cloud for me is just like DX12 things right now, its something for a portion of the gaming market who are upset by the power of their console choice, and use it as a "You just wait" type thing. While it really should be a ... "Hmm interesting concept wonder what gaming might be like in 10-15 years time".

I agree.

That's what this thread is all abou though. Advertising "future tech" to sell present consoles. I'm not even singling out MS on this. I'm highly skeptical of PSNow for the same reasons.

I'm not saying that cloud computing is bogus but the way MS wants us to think that it can be implemented is extremely improbable from a tech perspective.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

vivster said:
youarebadatgames said:
vivster said:
youarebadatgames said:

Why wouldn't this be possible on a X1? It wouldn't be unique to it, but it it's running on an X86 PC it'll run on an X1.

They did not specify how this particular demo works with the cloud. I highly doubt that they used cloud servers on the internet and rather had them on site. Since they said nothing about how it worked it might as well just been an interactive video stream that was completely running on cloud servers.

We will know when we see actual results on the X1(which we won't).

Another fun thing would be to know how they would accomodate people without or shoddy internet connection. Will the games suddenly become unplayable when there is a little lag? Will the game just crash or will it offload all the work back to the local CPU?


So you're saying they faked the whole thing?  You're free to believe whatever you want, but the demo was realtime, how do you fake that using an interactive video stream?  That kind of world simulation would take any gaming PC to its knees, and I doubt this simulation was done by hooking up a bunch of PCs together and running it locally.

As to gamers with shoddy internet connection, I don't really give a shit about them, they shouldn't play online anyways cause they fucking ruin my game. That's the price of entry if you want to play MMOs, LoL, SC2, CS, or anything else. Besides, world simulation data like that doesn't look as bandwidth intensive as a full video stream, as your GPU is still rendering the objects, just the physics is offloaded to the cloud.

I never said they faked it. As I mentioned MS is always very careful in not telling blatant lies. They just package it very good.

They never said how it worked. "Cloud computing" is a broad term. PSNow is cloud computing(because it's computed in the cloud and then sent via video stream to the receiving device). Every MMO ever does cloud computing(for the generation of loot for example).

They didn't mention how exactly the cloud was used in this case. So it could be anything and as far from the consumer reality away as possible.

If you had the slightest understanding of how the internet works you would see how delay is a huge issue when trying to stream realtime data. Be it video or cloud computed data chunks. It doesn't even matter how good your internet connection is. Sudden delays affect anyone. (just do a ping to 8.8.8.8 for a while and see how delay and jitter effects even you). So what happens when there is a sudden traffic burst in your area and the delays become huge for a second? Will your game break because it doesn't get the necessary data from the cloud fast enough or will the fps absolutely tank to 2fps because the CPU has to take over the work of the cloud processors?

MS has to accomodate for everyone and everything if they plan to use these features.


I can't remember the last time I had packet loss in any of my online games, and even if I did I'd just lag out and go to a different server.  Online games have been dealing with shitty internet connections for a long time.  Why would you want to keep playing an online game if your internet sucks?  Get it fixed or play something else.  I don't blame any companies for my shitty internet, and I play one of the most lag/packet loss sensitive games out there (quake) where I can feel a difference between 30mg and 70ms ping.

You're making it sound like lag and packet loss is super gamebreaking when people were dealing with it since 1996 on 56k modems.



Around the Network

Yeah, explain to me how 10 Mbps is better than 102Gbps.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."