By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Doesn't Nintendo already Publish and Develop more games each year than any other company? What are we complaining about!

one is less then multiple



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Around the Network

I think most people are crying about third parties... Unlike ps4/x1, Nintendo doesn't really have those buffering games in between big releases that their competitors have which is the issue atm...



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Nintendo certainly doesn't have something for everyone though, and since no one else is there to do it for them, we have a reason to complain.



Why is Naughty Dog being compared to the entirety of Nintendo? Do you mean Sony's World Wide Studios?

The reality is, for the average person, all that really matters is the total number of quality games they have the opportunity to play. If one new system has 10 games in a year while another has 20, they aren't going to break down who made those games, they're only going to think about whether or not they want to play them.



The real problem is the lack of awesome 3rd party games like Battlefield 4  Strider!



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

Around the Network

The issue is Nintendo has to carry so much of the load on their systems. Even the biggest and most prolific cannot keep up with dozens of companies.



People are complaining about the mandatory Nintendo hardware purchase.

Nintendo would be far better off as a developer, not having to worry about hardware specs, just games.



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

pokoko said:
Why is Naughty Dog being compared to the entirety of Nintendo? Do you mean Sony's World Wide Studios?

The reality is, for the average person, all that really matters is the total number of quality games they have the opportunity to play. If one new system has 10 games in a year while another has 20, they aren't going to break down who made those games, they're only going to think about whether or not they want to play them.

We had this argument in another thread. Since Quality is subjective, quantity has greater bearing on the average consumer because the average user has a higher chance of finding a game that suits his/her preferences

@bold: hence this qualification is flawed, quality is defined by a persons prefrence. So the number of games the average consumer would consider of quality would be capped by the amount of games avaliable, and the amount of games increase the probablity that you will find a game that you want.

Quality has little bearing to the truly average consumer.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

Augen said:
The issue is Nintendo has to carry so much of the load on their systems. Even the biggest and most prolific cannot keep up with dozens of companies.

Sega did when all of the bigger publishers and developers had contracts to develop exclusively for Nintendo. 



These people wouldn't complain about Nintendo's output if the Wii U would also get all the third-party games but since these games don't release very often on Wii U, many people think that Nintendo has to release more own games to compensate the lack of third-party games.

If you plan to buy a second console only for first party games, a Nintendo console can be as good as a Playstation. Same if you don't care about third-party games.