By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - [Staff] The gamrConnect Community and How We View Avatars and Signatures

Tagged games:

Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
TheLegendaryWolf said:
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
Slade6alpha said:
No!! Is Jizz safe?

How about Noble's...?

Well, I did promise if anyone complained, I would take it off! But so far, VGC doesnt seem to mind! But I have a feeling that kissing (and maybe my next sig) might be pushing it loll

Just imagine the look on the office worker's boss' s face when he looks at that 2nd gif!

Lolll, yea yea. Although I have not heard of one incident where that has happened! Maybe I should rethink about my next one actually! Like, its not NSFW per say but its certainly in the middle! Doesn't have any kissing though so theres that

Actually, I may have to rethink all of my gifs now that I think about it T_T

Maybe I'm missing something here, but, I don't see anything questionable about the gif in your sig. What am I missing? A message for the mods: come on! Leave jizz's name alone! 



Around the Network
Justagamer said:
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:

Lolll, yea yea. Although I have not heard of one incident where that has happened! Maybe I should rethink about my next one actually! Like, its not NSFW per say but its certainly in the middle! Doesn't have any kissing though so theres that

Actually, I may have to rethink all of my gifs now that I think about it T_T

Maybe I'm missing something here, but, I don't see anything questionable about the gif in your sig. What am I missing? A message for the mods: come on! Leave jizz's name alone! 

Well... To be fair, my sig was in the gray area depending on which camp people were on loll! Like, I can see this one being labeled as NSFW but it was on for 17 days which is higher than what I was expecting:

But then I choose this one which is SFW when you compare it to all the sigs and avatars that still show tits! Oh and it obviously got removed by one of the mods... Its amazing how some mods seem to think that drawn tits that is fully clothed is more arousing than women wearing nothing but a bra or showing a part of their tits in the avatar while making a sexual face... Flawed Logic is Flawed Logic:

Oh and this was going to be my next month's sig! I was gonna ask the mods if it was allowable before this thread came up btw... But oh well...

2014 = Drawn tits more sexually arousing than real tits... I have never had an issue with mods before and I always thought their decisions made sense but I dont get why some sigs/avatars are allowed and others aren't even though the ones that are allowed are more arousing than the ones that aren't! I get it, Its a guideline, but its seems to be a guideline where its so inconsistent that it doesn't make sense... If you are gonna enforce something, enforce it to everyone and not like, oh Jizz's sig is too spicy but userb is fine even though userb's sig/avatar is worse... The least you can do is fix everyone's avatar/sig in this thread and not just 4 peoples

@Mirson Thanks Mirson for agreeing with me lolll. I didn't want to come back to this thread but I wanted to respond to Justagamer



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

RolStoppable said:

Right, women don't show cleavage to get a sexual response. They do it because their breasts need good enough air circulation.

Similarly, they wear high heels because those shoes are so comfortable, not because they make their legs look longer and change the appearance of their lower leg muscle to what is generally considered to be a more attractive form.

No, Carl, it would never cross women's minds that they would wear certain clothes to become more desirable to men. And the phenomenom that a woman's underwear grows in size from string tanga to grandma slip once her status changes from single to safe relationship does not exist.

Most things to do with appearance are sexual in nature, as they are changed to make the person look more appealing.

Poor excuse for wanting no cleavage.



                            

I find it rather strange that "it being drawn" should be any sort of defense of what is being portrayed considering the fact that if most people questioned why 30+ year old people would watch anime/cartoons "it being drawn" is a non issue, it's just a media to get across what is no doubt a very real story. Can't have it both ways.

Regarding would you watch stuff that happens in your sigs on tv? I'd more ask could you sit down on the couch next to your mother and feel perfectly fine with something, when it comes to girls bouncing each other away with their boobs or doing the shuffle that Kirby007 has going on I think both of those would add an air of discomfort if watched with family members if I'm being honest.

As for the Harley Quinn while I think her cosplay of the character was perfect I think you were right to change it just to get the message across of a slightly less boob covered site Carl, lead by example and whatnot.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

RolStoppable said:
Carl2291 said:

Most things to do with appearance are sexual in nature, as they are changed to make the person look more appealing.

Poor excuse for wanting no cleavage.

I don't mind cleavage, I am just telling you mods what your rules mean. You guys said you wanted to be more consistent.

Also, NobleTeam360 still sports the same avatar.

I suggest you change your rules to "We will double down on users we don't like while we'll give users we like more leeway.", because that allows you to do what you want while maintaining consistency.

You realise yours shows off midriff?



 

Around the Network
Carl2291 said:
Seece said:

Is naked male chest allowed?


I thought your avatar was okay before, but you changed it anyway so nevermind.

AZWification said:

So, do I have to change my avatar or not?


I think its okay. Another moderator may think otherwise, though.

Is my new avatar better?



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

RolStoppable said:

I don't mind cleavage, I am just telling you mods what your rules mean. You guys said you wanted to be more consistent.

Also, NobleTeam360 still sports the same avatar.

I suggest you change your rules to "We will double down on users we don't like while we'll give users we like more leeway.", because that allows you to do what you want while maintaining consistency.


Different strokes for different folks. Yours is but one interpretation of what is and isnt sexual I suppose.

I just do not find this to be NSFW -

Nor do I find NT360's avatar to be NSFW.

Another user or mod may think different. Not for me to say. There is no specific guideline on what is or isnt safe for work. I just have to moderate on what I personally find to be NSFW (Or take it to the mod chat for further discussion).

AZWification said:

Is my new avatar better?


Nothing at all wrong with it.



                            

I find rols avatar not safe for work. Ban the pansy!



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

RolStoppable said:
kirby007 said:
I find rols avatar not safe for work. Ban the pansy!

For god's sake, your avatar is naked.

Aside from your point being invalid for being a pansy,
the whole animal kingdom except the humans don't think anything of nakedness, Nude rabbids is the default way to go



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

kirby007 said:
RolStoppable said:
kirby007 said:
I find rols avatar not safe for work. Ban the pansy!

For god's sake, your avatar is naked.

Aside from your point being invalid for being a pansy,
the whole animal kingdom except the humans don't think anything of nakedness, Nude rabbids is the default way to go


in that case the plunger makes him/her overdressed :D



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive