By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Why did the announcement of The Crew next gen parity not get nearly as much attention as the Trials Fusion disparity?

binary solo on 12 April 2014
Fusioncode said:
I think people are getting tired of the resolution arguments anyways. It's clear that the PS4 will have better looking multiplats this gen. We didn't have a discussion for every game that performed better on the 360 than the PS3.

In the first year after PS3 released? I think we did have a thread about the difference for nearly every game.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

Around the Network
Zekkyou on 12 April 2014
vivster said:

Parity is nothing special when it's just 1080p30. Whe had that before. Now if it were 1080p60 on both that would be news worthy.

Also parity at 1080p30 is a downer because it means PS4 isn't running at full potential. Trust me, this parity will be a big topic again if the X1 dips and the PS4 not ;)





DonFerrari on 12 April 2014

Maybe because we know what an AAA parity means ps4 is gimped, while a indie with this difference is crazy.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

fps_d0minat0r on 12 April 2014

because developers who gimp games for the sake of parity dont deserve attention.



jlmurph2 on 12 April 2014
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Trials was hyped as an Xbox 360 arcade game in the past. It was built off of Microsoft hype. Any sequel will share in the benefits.


Because it was a MS Studios game, now its a Ubisoft game. Not sure why its being sold in Retail for $40 though.



Around the Network
S.T.A.G.E. on 12 April 2014
jlmurph2 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Trials was hyped as an Xbox 360 arcade game in the past. It was built off of Microsoft hype. Any sequel will share in the benefits.


Because it was a MS Studios game, now its a Ubisoft game. Not sure why its being sold in Retail for $40 though.


Microsoft never owned the IP, they just paid for the development no different than Gears. It wasn't a Microsoft studios game but rather a Red Lynx game and whoever wanted to publish it published it. Ubisoft Published the PC version of Trials HD.



jlmurph2 on 12 April 2014
S.T.A.G.E. said:
jlmurph2 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Trials was hyped as an Xbox 360 arcade game in the past. It was built off of Microsoft hype. Any sequel will share in the benefits.


Because it was a MS Studios game, now its a Ubisoft game. Not sure why its being sold in Retail for $40 though.


Microsoft never owned the IP, they just paid for the development no different than Gears. It wasn't a Microsoft studios game but rather a Red Lynx game and whoever wanted to publish it published it. Ubisoft Published the PC version of Trials HD.


I'm telling you why it was hyped as an Xbox 360 arcade game. Because it was a MS studios game like many of the arcade games on the 360. I didn't say they developed or owned it, but it still was a Microsoft Studios game.