By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - First MGSV: GZ Review!

Sounds more realistic than the ridiculous Famitsu score (10/9/9/10).



Around the Network
pezus said:
tbone51 said:
Really?

is this by far the worse score?

What do you mean? It's the first score, so it's both the worst and the best


Ok, my bad. I meant if the metascore would be lets say.... 60-65!



pezus said:

http://translate.google.fr/translate?sl=fr&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gamekyo.com%2Freview10714_metal-gear-solid-v-ground-zeroes.html

More Less
Paw + AMS 
+ Technically the hair 
+ The new possibilities 
+ Many approaches 
+ Getting perfect scene 
+ For those who want the rank S. .. 
+ At least we can not wait to see the rest of the scenario ...
- Life of shame 
- Bonus fig leaf 
- Two scenes, including an unprecedented ... 
- ... And that 3/4 of the elements have been seen in trailers 
- David Hayter we lack 
- The price, of course



Conclusion: Generally, it is said that the price should not play on the assessment of a product.But there are limits. And these limits have clearly been taken here with just what looks like a too questionable practice to be acceptable. Experience suggests good things for the rest of the program but how not to think that without content "bonus" not necessarily the most useful, the prologue would be nothing other than a little thicker than the demo average offering 2h 30mn gameplay by our desire to snoop such MGS2 demo at the time already offered hunting Dogs Tags wait for the fan. 

Then lies the feeling that Kojima has simply removed the introduction of his game, yet supplied with the other episodes, for sale at a public sometimes about everything, using false pretenses to justify action. And even being a fan willing to spend hours in the search rankings S, objectively, it really hurts. 

4/10

____________________________

Basically: Great game, but way way way too short for the price.


First review to kill a game based on price??? Never heard of that. This seems more like a gamefly rental for me. 



pezus said:
tbone51 said:
pezus said:
tbone51 said:
Really?

is this by far the worse score?

What do you mean? It's the first score, so it's both the worst and the best


Ok, my bad. I meant if the metascore would be lets say.... 60-65!

Depends on if other reviewers will drag the score down for it being short


how do metal gear solid games score by the way? I thought they usually score high 80s- low 90s



Pay for a Demo. Wellcome to the end of the industry.



Around the Network
episteme said:
Sounds more realistic than the ridiculous Famitsu score (10/9/9/10).

They gave Resident Evil 6 a 39/40, so don't expect credible reviews from them.



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

Kind of expected that it was going to get hammered for its price. It should have been a pre-order bonus or something.

I'm not buying it 'til hits $10 on PSN, but until then, I'll be watching the game on YouTube.



All reviews should take price into consideration. I know they get their copies for free, but the people reading their reviews won't be.



examiner gave it 1/5. they said they finished the game in 25 mins lol



Kresnik said:
All reviews should take price into consideration. I know they get their copies for free, but the people reading their reviews won't be.


I agree, but if the scores would take such a drastic hit like in this case (they are rather prasisng the game itself, at least I assume Google didn't lose that ) that would mean, that reviews are valid only for released priced games unless reviews would get updated on the overall score any time a game gets a price cut, so it's a bit tricky.



So it is happening...PS4 preorder.

Greatness Awaits!