Quantcast
FF 15 and KH3 makes more sense on Wii U than Xone

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - FF 15 and KH3 makes more sense on Wii U than Xone

Kresnik said:
Wright said:

Didn't Sony had a contract with Square-Enix? Maybe the Kingdom Hearts HD collections are part of it.


Sony owns an 8.25% shareholding in Square Enix.  Clearly, the decision on which consoles to put Kingdom Hearts HD Collections was was a choice for the members to make by special resolution.  Sony teamed up with Yasuhiro Fukushima and blocked the resolution to have it on 360, thus getting PS3 exclusivity.

*nod*


Eh...

 

what?



Around the Network
Wright said:


Eh...

 

what?


I explained why Kingdom Hearts HD Collections are exclusive to PS3, duh.



Zero999 said:
oniyide said:
the OP still thinks the WIi U could run PS4 xone games no problem? Laughable. the little we've seen from FF15 blows away anything that we've seen from WIi U thus far. Now could they scale down? yeah probably. It wont be the same game as the true versions. Will SE spend the time, resources extra manpower to make a different version? NOPE kill that dream

the little non cgi footage we got from FF 15 is on par or a little better than X.

YOU should forget that dream that "It wont be the same game as the true versions."

full resolution pics for comparisins, it's not even close,  ps4.X1 are way more more powerful machines dude, it's time to accept reality.

 




Since Square Enix isn't bringing Tomb Raider DE and Thief over to WiiU, then they've all but given up on the platform. Besides, I highly doubt the WiiU could handle a game like FFXV from what we've seen of it.



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!

I think it probably would sell better, but it would have to have a massive downgrade in the graphics. I mean have you see FF15 is looks unreal. They could have use the original PS3 assets and up scaled them to the WiiU though.



Around the Network
Kresnik said:
Wright said:


Eh...

 

what?


I explained why Kingdom Hearts HD Collections are exclusive to PS3, duh.

But I didn't get the explanation...



Zero999 said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
Lets get somethings clear here:
FFvXIII was originally a ps3 exclusive, SE rebranded it as FFXV to get it on the PS4 and XB1(Which they expected to have a larger market share + dev costs of their engines was tanking them, which is also why they made 3 ffxIII)
FFXV would definitely be a downport, thus we have the problem of porting costs vs expected sales. Not to mention the game would face heavier competition on the Wii U from Bayo2 and X.

In Regards to Kingdom Hearts III, the numbered Kingdom Hearts have never been on Nintendo platforms, and SE is making multiplatform again because of money.
However, since the 3DS game is the closest in terms of story to 3, one could argue that it has a nintendo fanbase, but thats a strectch cause not every 3ds owner has a wii u and numbered kh never go to handhelds.

In the same "logic", KH was never on xbox and will be 10 years since it was on a sony home console. 4 KH are on nintendo platforms and sold very well there, period.

the games would run very well on wii u and would profit a lot.

Your spin is outrageous. You're very good at what you do. Not to mention there's more KH games for PS3 than there have ever been on Nintendo platforms.

Game wouldn't run period on Wii U, would take an entirely new team to develop it alongside of the current version.



Wright said:

But I didn't get the explanation...


I had a business law exam today.  It was a business law explanation.

I could explain it, but it wouldn't be very interesting xD



Kresnik said:
Wright said:

But I didn't get the explanation...


I had a business law exam today.  It was a business law explanation.

I could explain it, but it wouldn't be very interesting xD


Ah c'mon. Go ahead. I don't mind listening



Wright said:

Ah c'mon. Go ahead. I don't mind listening


Some decisions companies make require approval by the shareholders.

The threshold of which shareholders can pass a resolution for approval can be ordinary (50%) or special (75%).

Sony own 8% of the shares (and therefore the voting rights) in Square Enix.  I was suggesting they were going to team up with another shareholder who owned 20% of the shares/voting rights to be able to block the special resolution to allow the game to be on 360 (28% against would mean only 72% for, so it wouldn't pass).

Of course, none of this would ever happen since it's only applicable to UK law.  And the shareholders wouldn't be bothered about such trivial stuff as what platform a game would be on, that'd be up to the directors.

(Although I often wonder what Sony does with their 8% shareholding in Square Enix.  Do they ever use it to push more content onto their systems?)

Anyway, INTERESTING RITE?!