By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - MS leaving the console race would be good for gamers.

Wait, what?!

Yes, I beleive that a three console race ends up being bad for gamers, and that it would be best for everyone if Microsoft would leave.

Why?

Right now console gamers are split across two systems, Xbox and PlayStation.  If this was just Playstation, then studios could take bigger risks with new ideas and new IP's when everyone is all using the same hardware to play on (i.e it lowers costs at the studios end).

But what about Nintendo?

As much as I love 'em let's be honest, Nintendo have had no real presence in the home console market since the N64.  Sure Wii sold a lot of units, but mainly to people who bought it as a one off to play Wii Sports (i.e, your nan), and now those people have moved on to Candy Crush.  However, Sony should have some competition so they don't have a total monoply plus there are enough gamers who will buy two systems as well as die hard Nintendo fans to keep them in the market with a profitable but outside share.

Say that again.

I think a Future where Sony dominate, MS leave and Nintendo are a profitable minority is best for everyone.  Studios can take bigger risks as pretty much everyone has the same machine, so as gamers we probably end up with a better selection of games.  Although if this ever did happen I very much doubt Nintendo would actually survive, but I would like to see them contine as they do add a lot of gameplay inovations.  However I think not only have the people spoken, but Sony do make better consoles then anyone else.

But by this logic, wouldn't it be better if it was only Nintnedo?

Probaby, but let's be at least a little bit realistic here.  Nintendo is out of the console race, and gamers haven't accepted them since 1996.  The console wars are going to claim another brand in this generation and it is not going to be Sony.  Out of Xbox and Nintendo, I wouldn't miss Xbox.



Sony want to make money by selling art, Nintendo want to make money by selling fun, Microsoft want to make money.

Around the Network

I would like to laugh, but that is a very childish response.

 

So I'll just say that I disagree.



MS leaving would mean Amazon (Xbox) and Steam joining. http://www.gameranx.com/updates/id/20420/article/rumor-amazon-in-ongoing-talks-to-buy-xbox-from-microsoft/
Elop wanted to sell the Xbox division anyway.



Sony leaving is good



Well.. the whole text is completely the opposite of what I think... In fact, I wish all of the three were performing well.



Around the Network
Wright said:

I would like to laugh, but that is a very childish response.

 

So I'll just say that I disagree.


So you beleive that studios spending more money needlessly on games and putting un-nessery risks on new IP's is good for the industry.

Please explain.



Sony want to make money by selling art, Nintendo want to make money by selling fun, Microsoft want to make money.

I agree.



I don't want Sony to be lazy again, so no.



I don't think so, as much as some people hate to admit it, Sony and Microsoft need each other. If it wasn't for Microsoft Sony would never have improved their online functionality. If it wasn't for Sony Microsoft would have kept all that ridiculous DRM restrictions. Competition breeds excellence.



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!

only777 said:
Wright said:

I would like to laugh, but that is a very childish response.

 

So I'll just say that I disagree.


So you beleive that studios spending more money needlessly on games and putting un-nessery risks on new IP's is good for the industry.

Please explain.


If you think a monopoly drives up creativitiness and makes people being more risky...

 

...I'm afraid you're wrong.