shikamaru317 said:
|
Nvida flops =/= AMD flops
The 260X for example is 1971.2GFlops, 750 Ti would run circles around the X1's GPU, tho it's probably a bit bandwidth limited at higher resolutions.
@TheVoxelman on twitter
shikamaru317 said:
|
Nvida flops =/= AMD flops
The 260X for example is 1971.2GFlops, 750 Ti would run circles around the X1's GPU, tho it's probably a bit bandwidth limited at higher resolutions.
@TheVoxelman on twitter
zarx said:
The 260X for example is 1971.2GFlops, 750 Ti would run circles around the X1's GPU, tho it's probably a bit bandwidth limited at higher resolutions. |
Note: Nvidia GPUs do terribly in synthetic and compute benchmarks ...
How they do so acceptable in gaming benchmarks is beyond me.
Solid-Stark said: Saw on reddit. Nvidia has just taken the wraps off the $149 (£115) GTX 750 Ti and $119 (£90) GTX 750 graphics cards based on its new Maxwell architecture. Both cards are available to purchase now. The company is claiming Maxwell has twice the performance per watt of Kepler, and--in the case of the GTX 750 Ti--performance on par with a GTX 480, but with a power consumption of just 60 watts. All models of the GTX 750 Ti and GTX 750 will feature two DVI outputs and HDMI, with some third-party manufacturers including Displayport too. Neither card requires a 6-pin power connector. Core features of the GTX 750 Ti include 640 CUDA cores, a 1020 Mhz base clock, 2GB of 128-bit GDDR5 memory, 2048KB of L2 cache, and a 5.4Gbps memory speed. The GTX 750 features the same base clock, but only 512 CUDA cores, 1GB of 128-bit GDDR5 memory, and a 5.0 Gbps memory speed. While the GTX 750 Ti is a midrange GPU, early benchmarks have shown excellent performance across a range of games. InGameSpot's own testing the card ran the likes of Tomb Raider and Bioshock Infiniteat over 60fps on high settings. It also ran the beta of the new mech-based shooter Titanfall at 58fps at 1080p with 2XAA on, a feat not even accomplished by the Xbox One. |
Well of course it does.
The Xbone has an underclocked sub £100 gpu - aka, a terrible gpu. Then to add to it, the gpu is not as new as what you can get due to consoles development cycles taking too long.
If consoles don't come out with the best gpus possible any more, then they will fall flat very fast.
Goatseye said:
Not really... |
I like your sig... I always thought that to be a lame slogan....
Goatseye said: I want to see that graphics card play Halo 5 and Quantum Break. I guess it can't unlike X1. |
Please tell me you're not trying to suggest Xbox One has better exclusives then pc.
Not really related to titanfall but is the 750ti better than a 270x?
Titanfall looks and runs fine on xbo. plus $150 isnt all you need, you need all the shit to go with it, motherboard, ram, power supply, computer case, cpu, etc.
Its no secret PC is more powerful than the new consoles. This is Nvidia trolling since they are shit leopards about amd shit being used in the consoles.
Silly comparisons... Silly comparisons never change.
Respawn need to do a better optimizing the X1 vwersion of the game if a PC GPU of equal power is running better.