By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - MGS:GZ Looks and Performs a lot better on PS4

MonstaMack on 13 February 2014

... which is why I look forward to owning all 3 consoles this gen if the gap gets worst. But I'm not paying $40 for a 2 hour game.



It's just that simple.

Around the Network
Bliss on 13 February 2014
Dragon246 said:

Funny how some people choose to devalue a game only because its runs worse on their platform of choice.

On topic, hardly surprising.

eh eh I couldn't say better :)         and This game looking and performing better on PS4 is also obvious. But I would like to add that you can finish the Game in 2 hours, the core story mission, but with a 10% of completition ;)   this Game will last a lot more if you try all. But ok, this is The prologue to Metal Gear Solid V.



Shinobi-san on 13 February 2014

All this arguing and i don't even know who the guys are in the OP -_-

Can we wait and see the actual footage of the game before we start a war?



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

Ganoncrotch on 13 February 2014
Normchacho said:
ganoncrotch said:

I do think there is going to be a whole load of these threads like... for basically every single multiplatform game to come tho with a few exceptions, it isn't entirely news the power differrence between the X1 and the PS4 obviously it would be a whole lot less ad revenue for the site here if each game didn't have 10 threads about the differences. Still there isn't threads on the differences between versions of games on the Vita/3ds like Sonic all star racing ported between those 2 systems and the differences there are more apparent than some Jaggies at times. Not sure why those are less newsworthy than this? Is it because of the obvious power difference between the systems? because that is apparent here too.

 

Edit - if you see a train leaving the station for Derail City don't all board it at once....

I don't talk about the handhelds because I don't have either of them and I don't really think there is much of a "console war" between the two.


That's a fair point I guess, would be like a Wii Vs Ps360 comparison the last generation. They're gunning for different markets and aren't really in direct competition with each other as much as they are the only dedicated gaming handhelds on the market (mainstream market)

 

@shinobi-san I also have no clue who these 2 tweeting people are, but they both seem note and quoteworthy!



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

Wright on 13 February 2014

And here I am, waiting a price-cut on the 360 retail version, which I think it's the worst version of all



Around the Network
Ganoncrotch on 13 February 2014
MonstaMack said:
... which is why I look forward to owning all 3 consoles this gen if the gap gets worst. But I'm not paying $40 for a 2 hour game.


I think that's just the retail version of it, there is one going to psn and xbla for 20 I'm pretty sure.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

BMaker11 on 13 February 2014
MonstaMack said:
... which is why I look forward to owning all 3 consoles this gen if the gap gets worst. But I'm not paying $40 for a 2 hour game.

Fallout 3 was a 40min game and I'm sure you had no complaints paying $60 for it



BMaker11 on 13 February 2014
Normchacho said:
kowenicki said:
Or how about we ignore it and give it the reception it deserves. Paying for a 2 hour demo now?


Can we just call this what it is Kow? You came into a thread talking about the performance differences between the PS4 and Xbox One versions of the game and decided you'd rather discredit the game on some false outrage over a controversy that has been shown to be untrue.

Even if it was true that the game was only two hours long it would still be a worth while discusion because Phantom Pain will likely mirror this performance gap.

If you don't care about the performance gap than say that, don't try to pull the thread off topic. Lets be adults here huh?

Notice how he conveniently ignored my posts that have pretty much dispoven the game "being two hours", even when I directly quoted him (you know, because you get notifications for that).

Apparently the game can be beat in 90min, but you have to only do the core missions and ignore everything else the game has to offer. 9% completion if you just do the core missions. As I pointed out in other posts, Fallout 3 can be beat in 40min and MGS4 can also be beat in 90min....if you just do the core story missions, and nothing else. I guess the other 91% of the game just doesn't count if it means he can have a reason to complain and downplay that the XBone version performs significantly worse (damage control, actually). He'll just continue to hide under the veil of "I'm not paying for a 2 hour game" to make the supposed trangressions seem legitimate



Normchacho on 14 February 2014
BMaker11 said:
Normchacho said:
kowenicki said:
Or how about we ignore it and give it the reception it deserves. Paying for a 2 hour demo now?


Can we just call this what it is Kow? You came into a thread talking about the performance differences between the PS4 and Xbox One versions of the game and decided you'd rather discredit the game on some false outrage over a controversy that has been shown to be untrue.

Even if it was true that the game was only two hours long it would still be a worth while discusion because Phantom Pain will likely mirror this performance gap.

If you don't care about the performance gap than say that, don't try to pull the thread off topic. Lets be adults here huh?

Notice how he conveniently ignored my posts that have pretty much dispoven the game "being two hours", even when I directly quoted him (you know, because you get notifications for that).

Apparently the game can be beat in 90min, but you have to only do the core missions and ignore everything else the game has to offer. 9% completion if you just do the core missions. As I pointed out in other posts, Fallout 3 can be beat in 40min and MGS4 can also be beat in 90min....if you just do the core story missions, and nothing else. I guess the other 91% of the game just doesn't count if it means he can have a reason to complain and downplay that the XBone version performs significantly worse (damage control, actually). He'll just continue to hide under the veil of "I'm not paying for a 2 hour game" to make the supposed trangressions seem legitimate


Yes like I said I don't believe he was being...genuine, with his intentions. But us talking about it now is still being off topic. So I'll just leave it be.



Bet with Adamblaziken:

I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.

Fusioncode on 14 February 2014
kowenicki said:
Or how about we ignore it and give it the reception it deserves. Paying for a 2 hour demo now?

Gonna have to agree with Kowenicki here. I hope this game flops so Konami doesn't try to pull this shit in the future. 



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!