By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - [Staff] The Monthly Ban Report - January 2014

Nice work. I hope you had fun doing it.



Around the Network
Barozi said:
Nice work. I hope you had fun doing it.


Were you one of the spambots?



Normchacho said:

You're right, I did. I found it a quite fitting description of his behavior in that thread.

People who mock others (or flaming as it's known on the internet) don't always get banned. But it is still a bannable offense.

I also suggest you go back and look at his posts in that thread before you say he didn't insult people.

"But you all jump up and down and clap your hands fast if it makes you feel better about your lives"

"....also at least try and show a modicum of background knowledge"

ZaneWane posted: "Never mind. I misunderstood. Sorry."

Kow responded with: "you sure do...sorry... did."

He could have, and should have just gone into the thread said his piece and pointed out that the thread was old news. Instead he insisted on turning things ugly.  ie flamming.


If its bannable then the moderators need to be consitent on it. One person cant be banned while another is let off, and I say this as someone who spends a lot of time here mocking people for being stupid.

I have been in the thread, Ive read the entire thing. You need to look at the context. At who hes talking about/to and why he said it.

The first quote, about jumping up and down and clapping. Hes talking about the people laughing about the situation in the OP and the first post. The 2 tweets in the thread are laughing at the whole thing and the first post is simply "lulz". The topic itself is relatively old news and people are laughing about it (presumably thinkiing its gonna be negative for Xbox).

That much is obvious. I dont see it as insulting at all. The only people who would be insulted by that, would be the people who are guilty of doing it.

Telling someone to educate themselves on the topic at hand, while posting in said topic, I dont think can be classed as insulting neither. He worded it strongly. Could have been nicer about it, could have been ruder. To moderate for an aggressive tone is also unheard of here.

It just sits with me as a very, very harsh ban. I could understand a telling off or a general warning, but a Week long ban for it is steep. Especially steep, when you consider that the one word "lulz", troll/spam post didnt even get moderated.

Selective moderation is bad. There has to be consistency.

Talal said:

He always acts condescending. He has been warned about that in the past many times. That's probably why he got banned. 

Which is nothing but a rubbish ruling.

Different people have different posting styles. Some people post in a more aggressive/negative tone (see kowenicki and KylieDog for examples). Some people are always happy and quirky (See Smeags and NintendoPie). Some people dont know the language as well as others and some people are more eloquent.

I just think its a really harsh ban. Like I said, I can understand a warning for the first jumping and clapping comment, but the moderation on the second has me puzzled.



                            

Also - You should hire a mod specifically for spambots.

SpambotsNeedsBaning



                            

@mods: I don't envy you guys.At all.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Around the Network

Yes, I'm in the beta! Hold on? It's not that kind of list?



Lyrikalstylez said:

Omg it's one of the first times I don't see my name on their lol

 

 

oh and look at those xbox one bashing names and  none for play station4, we can clearly see which one has more classless fanboys...


Those are actually Xbox supporters posing as PlayStation supporters. 



AZWification said:
Normchacho said:
AZWification said:
Normchacho said:
Jesus, some users really need to shape up. Some people had 3 bans just in January. How many bans are users allowed before they are permabanned?

Well, users first get a warning for the respective offence ( trolling/flaming/spamming/alts/other), then it goes to bans ( 1-3-5-7-10-14-20-30 days). Sometimes it goes to 45 days or even 60 days, but only if the mods feel like  the user still has a chance to improve his/her behavior. If an user stays a while without getting banned (a number of months) then the user will get either a warning or a weaker ban. 

Oh, alright. That makes sense.

The users  that reach the 30 days limit are the ones that are most likely to get permabanned. There are some exceptions like Carl and Snesboy that had their trollish periods, but became nicer users in the meantime.


I think one of my very first times posting on these forums (not on a game wall or article) was immediately told to fuck off by Snesboy, it was the fact that he was banned for it almost immediately was what made me consider this place as a permanent forum to spend time on.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

ganoncrotch said:
AZWification said:

The users  that reach the 30 days limit are the ones that are most likely to get permabanned. There are some exceptions like Carl and Snesboy that had their trollish periods, but became nicer users in the meantime.


I think one of my very first times posting on these forums (not on a game wall or article) was immediately told to fuck off by Snesboy, it was the fact that he was banned for it almost immediately was what made me consider this place as a permanent forum to spend time on.

Yeah. He used to get very defensive and/ or very trollish for no damn reason whatsoever. Nowadays he barely even comes here.



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

Carl2291 said:

Which is nothing but a rubbish ruling.

Different people have different posting styles. Some people post in a more aggressive/negative tone (see kowenicki and KylieDog for examples). Some people are always happy and quirky (See Smeags and NintendoPie). Some people dont know the language as well as others and some people are more eloquent.

I just think its a really harsh ban. Like I said, I can understand a warning for the first jumping and clapping comment, but the moderation on the second has me puzzled.


I'm actually against aggressive style posting. It really annoys me when someone replies with "Seriously??!!!???!" or shit like that all the time (like FlamingWeazel for example) and I feel like banning them is justified because it's actually annoying and offensive. KylieDog is negative, but anyone getting offended by that is illogical. 

Anyway, I see your point of view and I do think that it's leaning a bit on the harsh side, but honestly like Trucks said it always turns into a fight when he makes a comment like that. People don't like to be looked down on.