I'm not understanding this at all. Dark souls is rated M for violence, partial nudity, and blood and gore. Dark souls 2 is rated T for violence, partial nudity, blood and gore, and mild language. So the game actually has more mature content. The rating synopsis of the two games basically reads exactly the same. I just find it really funny. 

rating team done goofed

The degree of violence, blood+gore, nudity, and language was deemed more mild than Dark Souls. There's degrees to it.

A rated T game, haven't seen those in a while.

For the same reason why Ace Attorney 5 got a M rating. The ESRB knows what it's doing.

Only reason Dark Souls got a M rating is because of the Quelaag fight. So don't expect any "nudity" in Dark Souls 2.

I don't give two poops, Dark Souls 2 is going to be AMAZING.

In the ESRB rating it is stated that the "Partial" nudity in Dark Souls II is from a "Partially topless women with hair covering the front of her breasts."  So that is the Quelaag!  

Also it says "There is a large creature made of hundreds of corpses and torture devices streaked with blood."  Yeah I think "Hundreds of corpses" is when I give a game an M lol!

Are there nudity in the game? Or heavy blood? T is fine for it.

I will take it as a good sign, eventually, GTA will be rated T and AO games will be rated M so I can buy my sex sims without going to an adult store