If devs werent going to do that then COD, FIfa is all we would have.

Sad really. You are just arguing for the sake of arguing with no facts to back it up. When you are shown to be wrong you simply change what you are trying to say in order to stay relevent.

Because Zelda is quirky and humble and colorful. That tech demo was not quirky or humble. It was serious, desaturated, and show off-y. 

Because I THINK Cod and fifa players are the vast majority in the gaming community,  I am not gonna affirm this... I'm just gonna say this based on my friends and people that i know in my country, They are restrictive gamers, they only buy this games no matter how much others inovate. And that's why i think the devs that put to much effort in new possibilities of gameplay will ended up in the bankrupcy. And you are affirming that the devs gonna fully optimize the hardware in this generation based on what? intuition? cristal ball? 

What's your point?

The OP asserts that, and I quote, "the only reason Nintendo makes underpowered systems is to generate more profit." However, the Wii U is being sold for $300 at a loss, and was sold at a loss even at launch, even for the $350 model which has been discontinued. This hardware has never been profitable for Nintendo.

Sony and Microsoft, on the other hand, are selling their consoles for $400 and $500, respectively, and probably also at a loss. But they lock functions of the hardware away behind a $50 or $60 /year service, effectively doubling the cost of the hardware for the consumer within a four-year period. And what's the cost of giving away a couple of older games every month to Sony or Microsoft? Sometimes those games are several years old. It's not as though they're missing out on lots of game sales with this strategy -- they never advertise at launch that a game will be available through PSPlus just six months down the road, so everyone who was planning on buying the game will buy it anyway.

It's not about the value to the consumer. It's about the profitability of the hardware, as presented in the OP. And no matter how you cut it, Sony and Microsoft's strategy of withholding major functions of the hardware from players who don't subscribe to their premium services is far more profitable for them than Nintendo's strategy of selling a cheaper console at a loss without offering any premium services they can charge extra for.

I'm with you, man. I think PSPlus is a terrific value. But the hardware itself is directly tied to that value, and you can't argue that Nintendo's $300 loss-leader is "more profitable" than Sony and Microsoft's strategy. That assertion of the OP is a blatant lie.

The FACT is, Nintendo's console costs $300, and Sony's console would cost $900 to use for 10 years. I feel comfortable using 10 years as an example, because Sony loves to brag about their 10-year plans. And I don't want to pay $900 for game hardware. I can buy a great gaming PC AND fill my Steam library with great games for less than that.

Nintendo fanboy loyalist rule #1: Whatever Nintendo's corporate policy is at the time is what you like

1996 - Optical discs suck! I'll never play a game with loading times! Why buy a 32-bit system? It's all about 64-bit!! Better graphics, better 3D! Silicon Graphics doood! Like Jurassic Park!

2001 - I guess optical discs are OK. Get me a soda while this game loads ...

2006 - Graphics? Who cares about graphics. It's all about motion controls now! Simple easy to play, I don't even need buttons to play Wii Sports or Nintendogs! Nintendo is brilliant!

2010 - Simple and easy to play is bad! You must have buttons! Stop playing iPhone games casuals! 99 cent games? You can't play Zelda on that! And Kinect? LOL.

Not saying there aren't equally blind PS and XBox fanboys because there are.

If you put Mario 3D World infront of any of them and another downgraded version running 480p on the Wii chip with a lower poly count, they'd all rather play the high speced Wii U version. 

Sales, because the division is coming to last gen consoles also. 

um no y wud u want 60fps when 30fps is more than enough, 720p is more than fine, i mean all the best games like Zelda Ocarina were not even 480p, the p doesnt make the game

these sony fans...

Nintendo just posted losses again.......

Cherry picking 2 games = you have no argument. Also, sports games live or die on Animations, the type os detailed, authentic sports games like the show were not possible on older hardware,

This nonsense about PC was already addressed. Strawman argument.