By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Why can't the board ever just celebrate Nintendo? Look at the chartz ppl!

JakDaSnack said:
Zekkyou said:

I'll skip past the MS stuff because it's really not worth my time (i mean really now), so i'll go right to the 79% (lol) article.

The fact you are even linking the article shows how little you understand of the methods they use to derive their statistics :P They make estimates based on current financial reports, not much else.

Infact, the site that the 79% comes from now have SNE estimated at a 47% ^^ http://www.macroaxis.com/invest/ratio/SNE--Probability-Of-Bankruptcy

They also now have Nintendo at a 76% chance of bankruptcy in the next 2 years

http://www.macroaxis.com/invest/market/NTDOY--fundamentals--Nintendo-Co-Ltd

So in the space of a few months Sony have dropped 33%, and Nintendo gone up by 54%. In the real world that of course makes no sense, but when looking at the basis they make those predictions it's perfectly logical. Perhaps i should copy and paste this for the next time someone brings up the 79% stuff :P

Well, actually it was one month:P  But either way, you clearly misunderstand my points so instead of clarifying...again,  I'll just leave it be:P

"Thirdly, I say that Sony is likely to go bankrupt because of this article" to which i proved the context of that statistic wrong. I can't imagine how you could perceive any kind of misunderstanding from that, but you haven't shown the best of knowledge in much at all thus far so I imagine it's to be expected :p



Around the Network
DucksUnlimited said:
snyps said:
DucksUnlimited said:
snyps said:
DucksUnlimited said:

snyps said:

Who has money in the bank??? Nintendo

Hell, even Sony has money in the bank. What is this even supposed to mean?

Sony made huge profits from ps1/2, HUGE!! Then they poured those very same in the wars of attrition known as psp/3/v.  The have nothing left to show for it except 2-5 billion. Ms xbox is negative 2-5 billion. Nintendo is up 35-40 billion.  (exact no. fluctuates).  Can you see what I mean?

Well first of all, I don't know that those numbers are accurate. I'd like a source. But even if they are, Nintendo has had far longer to acquire those profits, and far more products in the market to do so. They also had far less competition for their first two gens than Sony or MS. It's an extremely unfair, and thus, pointless, comparison.

Also, on a side note, I'm fairly sure the PSP was profitable.

 

 

 



snyps said:
DucksUnlimited said:
snyps said:
DucksUnlimited said:
snyps said:
DucksUnlimited said:

none of that takes away my point that Nintendo is no.1 on every chart on the front page.  Or that Nintendo has earned/saved the most money, or has higher rated games.  You think excusing this success with old/supply constrained means it's not an achievement.  You're wrong.  It is an achievement.  Everything I said was accurate. no.1 no.1 no.1 no.1 best games most earnings,  Those aren't lies, so don't call me inaccurate.  If i'm misleading then the chartz on the front page are misleading.  So, what is it you have a problem with here exactly?  Is it that i'm trying to make myself happy instead of letting everyone bring me down?  I don't need their doom drum i like the bright side, it's their if you look.

Wow. So nevermind context, let's just pretend that the Wii U being barely ahead of consoles that just released is something to celebrate. Or that a handheld in its peak year managing to outsell an old dying console by a few million is some amazing feat. Or that a company that has released 12 consoles managed to make more profit than a company that has released 3 is impressive.

If pretending that this is the case makes you happy, so be it. But making threads trying to pass these off as some grandiose accomplishments that put Nintendo "at the top of the totem pole" just makes you look ridiculous, and incapable of looking at the big picture.


our big pictures are very different.  From my perspective you look ridiculous.

In other words, you have no counterargument.

Thanks for playing.


a little premature isn't it?  You're focusing on the point of Wii U having sold the most 8th gen.  We established this was a non point (for now) yet you are still on it.  Then your other point is that 3ds success is not a significant achievement.  You know that's false, you must know it's an achievement by any standard. And finally, I'm not ONLY saying that Nintendo profited more in 30yrs than sony in 20 or ms in 10.  I'm saying they have SAVED more of the earnings AND earned more every SINGLE generation.

 

So i have no counterargument?  After all the arguments you ignored so you could focus on just these 3, you are defacto declaring you have no counter argument for the others.  Namely, Is there nothing to celebrate here?  Can you not concede a single victory to Nintendo?

Focusing on it? I brought it up ONE more time just to point out how ridiculous this thread is. That was it. And I never said the 3DS's success wasn't a significant achievement. The degree of hyperbole coming from you is insane. I said that the 3DS, in its peak year, outselling a 7 year old console which is in steady decline and has an extremely succesful succesor out, by a few million, isn't something to brag about or celebrate as far as I'm concerned. 

And those extra earnings are solely dependant on the fact that Nintendo had two systems in the wild vs only one from Sony and MS. Take away handhelds to even things out between the three and things would look completely different. Not to mention the fact that they've had far more systems out in general, and that the market before Sony and MS joined has far less competition and much lower production costs, making profits more easily attainable for Nintendo than they were for Sony or MS when they joined the market. Again, it all comes down to context, which is something you're either willfully ignoring or blissfully ignorant of.

You didn't even attempt to provide a cogent argument for the other points after I refuted them initially, so I didn't waste any further time on them. If you really feel a more thorough rebuke of these is necessary, I can be more specific.

Nintendo has plenty of accomplishments under its belt and has done a lot of great things for gaming. But looking at their current situation as if in a vaccuum and making things out to be more positive and meaningful than they really are is what I've been calling into question in my posts. Again, if looking at things in an incomplete fashion as you are makes you happy, nobody is stopping you. But spreading incomplete and out of context information in a thread as you are can be nothing but harmful.



DucksUnlimited said:

Focusing on it? I brought it up ONE more time just to point out how ridiculous this thread is. That was it. And I never said the 3DS's success wasn't a significant achievement. The degree of hyperbole coming from you is insane. I said that the 3DS, in its peak year, outselling a 7 year old console which is in steady decline and has an extremely succesful succesor out, by a few million, isn't something to brag about or celebrate as far as I'm concerned. 

And those extra earnings are solely dependant on the fact that Nintendo had two systems in the wild vs only one from Sony and MS. Take away handhelds to even things out between the three and things would look completely different. Not to mention the fact that they've had far more systems out in general, and that the market before Sony and MS joined has far less competition and much lower production costs, making profits more easily attainable for Nintendo than they were for Sony or MS when they joined the market. Again, it all comes down to context, which is something you're either willfully ignoring or blissfully ignorant of.

You didn't even attempt to provide a cogent argument for the other points after I refuted them initially, so I didn't waste any further time on them. If you really feel a more thorough rebuke of these is necessary, I can be more specific.

Nintendo has plenty of accomplishments under its belt and has done a lot of great things for gaming. But looking at their current situation as if in a vaccuum and making things out to be more positive and meaningful than they really are is what I've been calling into question in my posts. Again, if looking at things in an incomplete fashion as you are makes you happy, nobody is stopping you. But spreading incomplete and out of context information in a thread as you are can be nothing but harmful.

What does Nintendo have to do for it to be okay that i can look at them post about them in a positive light?  

 

Having a game at no.1 (this week)  nope doesn't count

having a hardware at no.1 (this week)   nope doesn't count either

Having the most consoles sold (8th gen)  getting a head start doesn't count, nope

Having the most handhelds sold (8th gen)  not amazing.. too bad.. nope, doesn't count

Having the best rated games (8th gen)  don't count.. competition wasn't ready yet

Having the best line-up next year (subjective)  how can this be celebrated? it's subjective!

Having the best record of profit (every gen)  can't count handhelds as profit, nope

Having the most money in the bank (from game dev)  money made the smart easy way doesn't count

Nintendo being the industry leader (in a sense)  being the first, the best, smartest, richest, basically no.1 at everything, and the one everyone copies does not make you the leader because... um... none of those things count.  

DucksUnlimited said:

I said that the PSVITA, in its peak year, outselling a 7 year old console which is in steady decline and has an extremely succesful succesor out, by a few million, isn't something to brag about or celebrate as far as I'm concerned. 

You wouldn't let ppl celebrate if Vita had done it? You say it's not amazing, I say you're playing it down like it's not a significant achievement, and I'm the one using Hyperbole to insane levels?



JoeTheBro said:
For the few things in your op that are correct, they apply to the 3DS. Fact of the matter is we as a community are much more focused on home consoles and especially next gen.

For the few of us that do care about handhelds, well look at Nintendo's new forecast. They dropped 3DS sales by about 5 million for the year. That's not good at all. 3DS relative to some of the systems out is doing great, but on its own it's not doing amazing.

Its because that 3DS forcast was way too optmistic in the first place, it was never going to sell that many in one year. Companies do this all the time they over predict sales forcasts and have to revise them down. People are reading way too much into that part of the report, its Nintendo's arrogance for thinking it would sell 20 million units in this fiscal year. It a red herring and the 3DS sales during the hoiliday prove that.



 

Around the Network
snyps said:

Today is ridiculous on vgc. Every post in hot topics is a venomous Nintendo thread. That's an everyday thing but goddamn today is ridiculous. Why don't we look at the chartz ????

no.1 software this week??Nintendo game

no.1 hardware every week??? Nintendo hardware

Most 8th gen consoles sold?? Nintendo

Most 8th gen handhelds sold?? Nintendo

Most profits every generation??? NINTENDO

Who has money in the bank??? Nintendo

Who has the systems with the best rated games????? Nintendo

Who has the best games coming in 2014???? Nintendo

Who's on top of the totem pole??? Nintendo

 

Gawd!! Does anybody know what it's like being a Nintendo fan on vgc?? It's freaking rough. So the Wii U is a little behind the weekly sales of competing hardwares during their holiday launch. So? So Wii U isn't no.1 this holiday. Nintendo is! Just stahp!


Buuuut it's only handhelds at the moment and of course only home consoles count now that Sony is better! It's also way better to throw out a lot of money and tell people it's "for the players!" from a business perspective. You need to understand that!



To be honest, its not only this way on VGC - everyone everywhere on the internet seems to have the urgent need repeat frequently how bad WiiU is.
And that will NOT help WiiU, in fact i guess this is also one factor influencing the sales.
Why to buy a console, if you everywhere read how bad it is? - of course it is NOT!
I guess 90% of the people would NOT recommend buying WiiU when being asked which console to buy (PS4/Xbone/WiiU).
But secretly they wish they could play Nintendo games on Xbone and PS4.
It is like - "I want to play Mario3DW, Zelda WW, Donkey Kong TF, Mario Kart 8, X, FEvsSMT, Bayo2, Pikmin3, SmashBros but i dont want to buy Nintendo console."
In my opinion thats stupid. These are (no doubt) 8 good games. Why should it not be worth buying a console just for these games?

So as a summary - Nintendo is doomed and everyone loves to tell that all day long.



snyps said:
DucksUnlimited said:
snyps said:
DucksUnlimited said:
snyps said:
DucksUnlimited said:

snyps said:

Who has money in the bank??? Nintendo

Hell, even Sony has money in the bank. What is this even supposed to mean?

Sony made huge profits from ps1/2, HUGE!! Then they poured those very same in the wars of attrition known as psp/3/v.  The have nothing left to show for it except 2-5 billion. Ms xbox is negative 2-5 billion. Nintendo is up 35-40 billion.  (exact no. fluctuates).  Can you see what I mean?

Well first of all, I don't know that those numbers are accurate. I'd like a source. But even if they are, Nintendo has had far longer to acquire those profits, and far more products in the market to do so. They also had far less competition for their first two gens than Sony or MS. It's an extremely unfair, and thus, pointless, comparison.

Also, on a side note, I'm fairly sure the PSP was profitable.

 

 

 


LMFAO where did you even get that? How were these numbers even produced? You just searched for this on the net and present it as fact? Please give me the source. You've lost all credibility OP especially when you rely on data such as this.



PS3, PS4, PSV, Wii U, 3DS + 3DS XL Owner.

PlayStation Nation

NNID: aminryu1

I need to stop buying games...

Zekkyou said:
JakDaSnack said:
Zekkyou said:

I'll skip past the MS stuff because it's really not worth my time (i mean really now), so i'll go right to the 79% (lol) article.

The fact you are even linking the article shows how little you understand of the methods they use to derive their statistics :P They make estimates based on current financial reports, not much else.

Infact, the site that the 79% comes from now have SNE estimated at a 47% ^^ http://www.macroaxis.com/invest/ratio/SNE--Probability-Of-Bankruptcy

They also now have Nintendo at a 76% chance of bankruptcy in the next 2 years

http://www.macroaxis.com/invest/market/NTDOY--fundamentals--Nintendo-Co-Ltd

So in the space of a few months Sony have dropped 33%, and Nintendo gone up by 54%. In the real world that of course makes no sense, but when looking at the basis they make those predictions it's perfectly logical. Perhaps i should copy and paste this for the next time someone brings up the 79% stuff :P

Well, actually it was one month:P  But either way, you clearly misunderstand my points so instead of clarifying...again,  I'll just leave it be:P

"Thirdly, I say that Sony is likely to go bankrupt because of this article" to which i proved the context of that statistic wrong. I can't imagine how you could perceive any kind of misunderstanding from that, but you haven't shown the best of knowledge in much at all thus far so I imagine it's to be expected :p


Thank you Zekkyou for correcting JakDaSnack. It's annoying how so many people use the '79% going bankrupt' argument when they clearly don't understand how statistics works.



PS3, PS4, PSV, Wii U, 3DS + 3DS XL Owner.

PlayStation Nation

NNID: aminryu1

I need to stop buying games...

snyps said:

What does Nintendo have to do for it to be okay that i can look at them post about them in a positive light?  

 

Having a game at no.1 (this week)  nope doesn't count (Isn't correct)

having a hardware at no.1 (this week)   nope doesn't count either (Doesn't have any meaningful competition. Of course it counts, it just isnt particularly impressive. Not to mention the fact that the PS4 is outselling it in every region it's available in currently despite supply constraints.)

Having the most consoles sold (8th gen)  getting a head start doesn't count, nope (So now you no longer think it's a meaningless point? Make up your mind lol)

Having the most handhelds sold (8th gen)  not amazing.. too bad.. nope, doesn't count (Same as my second response)

Having the best rated games (8th gen)  don't count.. competition wasn't ready yet (Agreed. It's a stupid comparison. Glad you could see it my way.)

Having the best line-up next year (subjective)  how can this be celebrated? it's subjective! (You can be hyped about it. I certainly am. Hell, MK8 will be the reason I pick up my Wii U. Nobody said you couldn't celebrate. People have simply been telling you not to pass this off as fact.)

Having the best record of profit (every gen)  can't count handhelds as profit, nope (Of course you can. But adding them together with consoles and comparing that combination against just the competitors' consoles isnt a fair comparison. You're pretending it is, which is the issue.)

Having the most money in the bank (from game dev)  money made the smart easy way doesn't count (Has nothing to do with being smart or easy, it has to do with being in a different situation and having far more products out. Where do you come up with this stuff?

Nintendo being the industry leader (in a sense)  being the first, the best, smartest, richest, basically no.1 at everything, and the one everyone copies does not make you the leader because... um... none of those things count.  (Wow. This statement just shows your inability to think objectively about this topic. This is borderline corporate worship. It just goes to show what a completely wasted effort all my posts so far have been. It's like trying to throw bologna at a tank. Everything I said just bounces off of you and you ignore it because it isn't what you want to hear. Plus I lost bologna, or in this case time, in the process. 

DucksUnlimited said:

I said that the PSVITA, in its peak year, outselling a 7 year old console which is in steady decline and has an extremely succesful succesor out, by a few million, isn't something to brag about or celebrate as far as I'm concerned. 

You wouldn't let ppl celebrate if Vita had done it? You say it's not amazing, I say you're playing it down like it's not a significant achievement, and I'm the one using Hyperbole to insane levels? (The only thing that would have made that amazing is if it had still done as poorly as it did in its first year. If it had been selling at a terrible rate, and then gone on to sell 3-4 times as much the following year, then yeah that's amazing. But the actual rate of sales, by itself, isn't particularly impressive on its own. Had the vita had a decent first year and then outsold a dying console during its peak, then no, I wouldn't call that a significant achievement.)

Almost every one of your points above is a strawman of what I actually said. If you could address my actual arguments, you would have. Instead you put words in my mouth and try and attack arguments I didn't make. And even then you failed at that. I'm still not sure if it's an issue with comprehension, or intentional ignorance regarding the points I'm making, but trying to convince you of anything that goes against your ideal reality is a waste of my, and everyone else's time.