binary solo said: I also think the 240-250k number this thuway character threw out in a tweet might have thrown vgc for a loop. I wouldn't be surprised if their usual data source gave them ~150k for w/e 14th dec, so having a lot more than that being reported from an allegedly reliable source is cause to re-evaluate things. If buying patterns have shifted significantly to say online retailers then vgc data modelling may not be accounting for that shift ajd this would lead to significant systematic error in the estimate |
Thuway's numbers were from just a day or two ago though, right? The numbers are WELL over 2 days late, over a week late in fact, so it can't be that.
It could, god forbid, make things even later though...